Literature DB >> 21578177

Chlorido(5-formyl-2-hydroxy-phenyl-κC)mercury(II).

Ze-Bao Zheng1, Shi-Ying Ma, Ren-Tao Wu, Yin-Feng Han, Jing-Rong Lu.   

Abstract

In the planar (r.m.s. deviation = 0.027 Å) title compound, [Hg(C(7)H(5)O(2))Cl], the Hg(II) atom shows a typical linear coordination by a C atom of the benzene ring and a Cl atom. Inter-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds are present in the crystal structure, resulting in chains propagating along the b axis. The crystal studied was a non-merohedral twin, with a twin ratio of 0.802 (2):0.198 (2).

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21578177      PMCID: PMC2971446          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809043529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background to the use of cyclo­metallated compounds in synthesis, catalysis and materials, see: Gruter et al. (1995 ▶); Dupont et al. (2005 ▶). For related structures and the synthesis of related cyclo­mercurated compounds, see: Xu et al. (2009 ▶). For the preparation of cyclo­mercurated compounds, see: Ryabov et al. (2003 ▶); Wu et al. (2001 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[Hg(C7H5O2)Cl] M = 357.15 Monoclinic, a = 4.1004 (10) Å b = 14.842 (3) Å c = 14.116 (3) Å β = 106.657 (6)° V = 823.0 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 18.97 mm−1 T = 295 K 0.20 × 0.18 × 0.16 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.116, T max = 0.151 4116 measured reflections 1424 independent reflections 1333 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.039

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.039 wR(F 2) = 0.103 S = 1.09 1424 reflections 101 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 2.05 e Å−3 Δρmin = −1.73 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1996 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Siemens, 1996 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809043529/hb5153sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809043529/hb5153Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Hg(C7H5O2)Cl]F(000) = 640
Mr = 357.15Dx = 2.882 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 2640 reflections
a = 4.1004 (10) Åθ = 2.7–29.5°
b = 14.842 (3) ŵ = 18.97 mm1
c = 14.116 (3) ÅT = 295 K
β = 106.657 (6)°Block, colorless
V = 823.0 (3) Å30.20 × 0.18 × 0.16 mm
Z = 4
Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer1424 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1333 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.039
φ and ω scansθmax = 25.1°, θmin = 1.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −4→4
Tmin = 0.116, Tmax = 0.151k = −12→17
4116 measured reflectionsl = −16→15
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.103H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.09w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0429P)2 + 12.0653P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1424 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
101 parametersΔρmax = 2.05 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −1.73 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Hg10.32843 (16)0.87897 (3)0.53385 (4)0.0345 (2)
Cl10.5374 (10)0.9140 (2)0.4016 (3)0.0405 (8)
O10.093 (5)1.0269 (8)0.8767 (9)0.076 (4)
O20.069 (4)0.6993 (7)0.5877 (8)0.055 (3)
H20.00230.64930.59820.083*
C10.031 (5)0.8833 (8)0.8033 (11)0.038 (3)
C20.131 (4)0.9074 (9)0.7223 (10)0.033 (3)
H2A0.18980.96710.71530.040*
C30.148 (4)0.8460 (9)0.6511 (9)0.029 (3)
C40.052 (4)0.7564 (10)0.6613 (10)0.036 (3)
C5−0.063 (5)0.7317 (9)0.7410 (11)0.042 (3)
H5−0.12880.67240.74670.051*
C6−0.081 (4)0.7932 (10)0.8110 (10)0.039 (4)
H6−0.16420.77660.86310.047*
C7−0.007 (6)0.9495 (12)0.8760 (11)0.059 (5)
H7−0.11190.93190.92350.070*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Hg10.0437 (3)0.0258 (3)0.0364 (3)−0.0009 (2)0.0153 (3)0.0038 (2)
Cl10.050 (2)0.0390 (18)0.0357 (17)−0.0049 (17)0.0181 (16)−0.0012 (15)
O10.133 (14)0.035 (6)0.067 (8)−0.005 (8)0.040 (9)−0.009 (6)
O20.099 (11)0.028 (5)0.047 (6)−0.014 (6)0.033 (7)−0.007 (5)
C10.050 (10)0.022 (7)0.043 (8)0.011 (6)0.015 (7)0.002 (5)
C20.036 (8)0.021 (6)0.044 (8)0.008 (6)0.013 (6)0.008 (6)
C30.032 (7)0.021 (6)0.030 (7)0.002 (6)0.003 (5)0.007 (5)
C40.042 (8)0.030 (7)0.029 (7)−0.003 (6)0.002 (6)0.003 (6)
C50.061 (10)0.021 (6)0.047 (8)−0.005 (7)0.020 (8)0.008 (6)
C60.052 (9)0.034 (8)0.034 (7)−0.005 (7)0.014 (7)0.016 (6)
C70.096 (15)0.048 (10)0.038 (9)0.017 (10)0.027 (10)0.009 (7)
Hg1—C32.058 (13)C2—C31.37 (2)
Hg1—Cl12.326 (4)C2—H2A0.9300
O1—C71.22 (2)C3—C41.405 (19)
O2—C41.357 (17)C4—C51.39 (2)
O2—H20.8193C5—C61.36 (2)
C1—C21.37 (2)C5—H50.9300
C1—C61.428 (19)C6—H60.9300
C1—C71.46 (2)C7—H70.9300
C3—Hg1—Cl1179.1 (4)O2—C4—C3115.9 (13)
C4—O2—H2109.5C5—C4—C3120.1 (13)
C2—C1—C6119.2 (13)C6—C5—C4120.8 (13)
C2—C1—C7121.9 (13)C6—C5—H5119.6
C6—C1—C7118.4 (15)C4—C5—H5119.6
C1—C2—C3121.8 (13)C5—C6—C1119.2 (13)
C1—C2—H2A119.1C5—C6—H6120.4
C3—C2—H2A119.1C1—C6—H6120.4
C2—C3—C4118.7 (13)O1—C7—C1122.3 (17)
C2—C3—Hg1122.4 (10)O1—C7—H7118.8
C4—C3—Hg1118.8 (10)C1—C7—H7118.8
O2—C4—C5123.9 (13)
C6—C1—C2—C3−4(2)O2—C4—C5—C6−178.4 (16)
C7—C1—C2—C3−176.1 (16)C3—C4—C5—C6−1(2)
C1—C2—C3—C41(2)C4—C5—C6—C1−2(3)
C1—C2—C3—Hg1−175.8 (12)C2—C1—C6—C54(2)
C2—C3—C4—O2179.0 (14)C7—C1—C6—C5176.7 (16)
Hg1—C3—C4—O2−3.9 (18)C2—C1—C7—O1−11 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C51(2)C6—C1—C7—O1177.2 (19)
Hg1—C3—C4—C5178.5 (12)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···O1i0.821.912.727 (16)172
Hg1—C32.058 (13)
Hg1—Cl12.326 (4)
C3—Hg1—Cl1179.1 (4)
Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O2—H2⋯O1i0.821.912.727 (16)172

Symmetry code: (i) .

  5 in total

1.  Low-potential cyclometalated osmium(II) mediators of glucose oxidase.

Authors:  Alexander D Ryabov; Valentin S Soukharev; Larissa Alexandrova; Ronan Le Lagadec; Michel Pfeffer
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2003-10-20       Impact factor: 5.165

Review 2.  The potential of palladacycles: more than just precatalysts.

Authors:  Jairton Dupont; Crestina S Consorti; John Spencer
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Chlorido(2-formyl-6-hydroxy-phenyl-κC)mercury(II).

Authors:  Chen Xu; Fei-Fei Cen; Zhi-Qiang Wang; Yu-Qing Zhang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-06-10

5.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.