The structural characterization of the new iron-zinc hepta-borate bromide with composition Fe(1.59)Zn(1.41)B(7)O(13)Br, prepared by chemical transport is reported. A rigid-body model with constrained generalized coordinates was defined in order to hold the positions of the B atoms at reasonable inter-atomic distances that typically would reach unacceptable values because of the weak scattering power of boron. There are three independent sites for the B atoms of which two are tetra-hedrally coordinated. The bond-valence sum around the third B atom, located on a threefold rotation axis, was calculated considering two cases of coordination of boron with oxygens: trigonal-planar and tetrahedral. The contribution of the fourth O atom to the bond-valence sum was found to be only 0.06 v.u., indicating the presence of a very weak bond in the right position to have a distorted tetra-hedral coordination in favour of the trigonal-planar coordination for the third B atom. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) was used to determinate the Fe/Zn ratio.
The structural characterization of the new iron-zinc hepta-borate bromide with composition Fe(1.59)Zn(1.41)B(7)O(13)Br, prepared by chemical transport is reported. A rigid-body model with constrained generalized coordinates was defined in order to hold the positions of the B atoms at reasonable inter-atomic distances that typically would reach unacceptable values because of the weak scattering power of boron. There are three independent sites for the B atoms of which two are tetra-hedrally coordinated. The bond-valence sum around the third B atom, located on a threefold rotation axis, was calculated considering two cases of coordination of boron with oxygens: trigonal-planar and tetrahedral. The contribution of the fourth O atom to the bond-valence sum was found to be only 0.06 v.u., indicating the presence of a very weak bond in the right position to have a distorted tetra-hedral coordination in favour of the trigonal-planar coordination for the third B atom. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) was used to determinate the Fe/Zn ratio.
The method of preparation was based on Schmid (1965 ▶). For related structures, see: Mao et al. (1991 ▶); Dowty & Clark (1972 ▶, 1973 ▶); Mendoza-Alvarez et al. (1985 ▶); Schindler & Hawthorne (1998 ▶); Knorr et al. (2007 ▶). For properties and potential applications of boracites, see: Campa-Molina et al. (1994 ▶, 2002 ▶); Dana (1951 ▶); Mathews et al. (1997 ▶); Smart & Moore (1992 ▶). For bond-valence parameters for oxides, see: Brese & O’Keeffe (1991 ▶).
Bruker D8 Advance diffractometerSpecimen mounting: packed powder sample containerSpecimen mounted in reflection modeScan method: step2θmin = 8.1, 2θmax = 110.0°Increment in 2θ = 0.02°
Refinement
R
p = 0.018R
wp = 0.025R
exp = 0.014R
B = 0.06S = 1.89Profile function: pseudo-Voigt modified by Thompson et al. (1987 ▶)397 reflections18 parametersData collection: DIFFRAC/AT (Siemens, 1993 ▶); cell refinement: FULLPROF (Rodríguez-Carvajal, 2006 ▶; Rodriguez & Rodriguez-Carvajal, 1997 ▶, a strongly modified version of that described by Wiles & Young, 1981); data reduction: FULLPROF; method used to solve structure: coordinates were taken from an isotypic compound (Mao et al., 1991 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: FULLPROF; software used to prepare material for publication: DIAMOND.Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809044407/br2119sup1.cifRietveld powder data: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809044407/br2119Isup2.rtvAdditional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF reportEnhanced figure: interactive version of Fig. 4
Fe1.59Zn1.41B7O13Br
F(000) = 1546.0
Mr = 544.65
Dx = 4.013 Mg m−3
Trigonal, R3c
Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54175 Å
Hall symbol: R 3 -2"c
T = 300 K
a = 8.6081 (1) Å
Particle morphology: irregular
c = 21.0703 (3) Å
pale pink
V = 1352.12 (3) Å3
irregular, 20 × 20 mm
Z = 6
Specimen preparation: Prepared at 1173 K
Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer
Data collection mode: reflection
Radiation source: sealed X-ray tube, Cu Kα
Scan method: step
graphite
2θmin = 8.12°, 2θmax = 110.01°, 2θstep = 0.02°
Specimen mounting: packed powder sample container
Least-squares matrix: full with fixed elements per cycle
5240 data points
Rp = 0.018
Profile function: pseudo-Voigt modified by Thompson et al. (1987)
Rwp = 0.025
18 parameters
Rexp = 0.014
Weighting scheme based on measured s.u.'s
RBragg = 0.06
(Δ/σ)max = 0.02
R(F2) = 0.06
Background function: linear interpolation between a set of 72 background points with refinable
heights