Literature DB >> 21578009

6-Methyl-sulfanyl-4H-pyrimido[1,6-a]pyrimidin-4-one.

Quinhua Huang, Paul F Richardson, Eugene Rui, Arnold L Rheingold, Alex Yanovsky.   

Abstract

Reaction of 2-(methyl-sulfan-yl)pyrimidin-4-amine with the 5-(methoxy-vinyl-idene) derivative of Meldrum's acid and subsequent heating of the product in Dowtherm fluid yielded the title compound, C(8)H(7)N(3)OS, which was proven to contain a bicyclic 4H-pyrimido[1,6-a]pyrimidine system. All non-H atoms of the mol-ecule are coplanar within 0.15 Å. The bond-length distribution in the bicyclic core shows localization of the double bonds. The geometry of the intra-molecular S⋯O 1,5-contact [2.534 (2) Å] is consistent with the existence of an attractive inter-action.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21578009      PMCID: PMC2970259          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809038562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the structure of a compound with a similar bicyclic carbon–nitro­gen core, see: Olomucki et al. (1984 ▶). For statistical studies of the geometry of S⋯O inter­actions, see: Rosenfield et al. (1977 ▶); Iwaoka et al. (2002 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H7N3OS M = 193.23 Monoclinic, a = 9.7621 (8) Å b = 4.1725 (3) Å c = 20.4092 (16) Å β = 100.106 (1)° V = 818.42 (11) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.35 mm−1 T = 123 K 0.48 × 0.14 × 0.08 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001 ▶) T min = 0.849, T max = 0.972 6497 measured reflections 1498 independent reflections 1333 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.022

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.035 wR(F 2) = 0.097 S = 1.13 1498 reflections 118 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.43 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.19 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2004 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR2004 (Burla et al., 2005 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-32 (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809038562/rz2363sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809038562/rz2363Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H7N3OSF(000) = 400
Mr = 193.23Dx = 1.568 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 4134 reflections
a = 9.7621 (8) Åθ = 3.2–25.4°
b = 4.1725 (3) ŵ = 0.35 mm1
c = 20.4092 (16) ÅT = 123 K
β = 100.106 (1)°Blade, brown
V = 818.42 (11) Å30.48 × 0.14 × 0.08 mm
Z = 4
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer1498 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1333 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.022
φ and ω scansθmax = 25.4°, θmin = 2.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001)h = −11→11
Tmin = 0.849, Tmax = 0.972k = −4→5
6497 measured reflectionsl = −24→24
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.097H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.13w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.045P)2 + 0.5615P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1498 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
118 parametersΔρmax = 0.43 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.19 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.56563 (5)0.91748 (12)0.81678 (2)0.02069 (19)
O10.80408 (15)0.9008 (4)0.78390 (7)0.0276 (4)
N10.59517 (17)0.5753 (4)0.92701 (8)0.0203 (4)
N20.79659 (16)0.5851 (4)0.87620 (7)0.0172 (4)
N30.99408 (17)0.2689 (4)0.92351 (8)0.0238 (4)
C10.3990 (2)0.9169 (5)0.84302 (11)0.0280 (5)
H1A0.33331.04740.81230.042*
H1B0.40891.00640.88800.042*
H1C0.36420.69660.84310.042*
C20.65797 (19)0.6714 (5)0.87950 (9)0.0183 (4)
C30.6652 (2)0.3762 (5)0.97497 (10)0.0209 (4)
H3B0.61930.30941.01000.025*
C40.7959 (2)0.2700 (5)0.97507 (9)0.0203 (4)
H4A0.83920.12841.00890.024*
C50.8678 (2)0.3717 (5)0.92427 (9)0.0186 (4)
C61.0583 (2)0.3766 (5)0.87347 (11)0.0254 (5)
H6A1.14950.30100.87190.030*
C70.9993 (2)0.5853 (5)0.82589 (9)0.0199 (4)
H7A1.05060.65120.79270.024*
C80.8652 (2)0.7063 (5)0.82424 (9)0.0219 (4)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0177 (3)0.0225 (3)0.0219 (3)0.00111 (19)0.0038 (2)0.0028 (2)
O10.0237 (8)0.0363 (9)0.0241 (7)0.0002 (7)0.0079 (6)0.0095 (7)
N10.0196 (8)0.0199 (9)0.0220 (8)−0.0009 (7)0.0053 (7)−0.0002 (7)
N20.0184 (8)0.0176 (8)0.0164 (8)−0.0021 (6)0.0050 (6)−0.0017 (6)
N30.0199 (8)0.0240 (9)0.0278 (9)0.0015 (7)0.0047 (7)−0.0014 (8)
C10.0201 (11)0.0335 (12)0.0312 (11)0.0032 (9)0.0068 (9)0.0059 (10)
C20.0169 (9)0.0178 (9)0.0201 (10)−0.0015 (8)0.0026 (8)−0.0037 (8)
C30.0211 (10)0.0232 (10)0.0190 (10)−0.0025 (8)0.0052 (8)0.0004 (8)
C40.0233 (10)0.0189 (10)0.0184 (10)−0.0007 (8)0.0026 (8)0.0006 (8)
C50.0179 (10)0.0173 (9)0.0200 (10)−0.0016 (8)0.0022 (8)−0.0041 (8)
C60.0180 (10)0.0264 (11)0.0326 (11)−0.0005 (9)0.0068 (9)−0.0070 (9)
C70.0253 (11)0.0186 (10)0.0183 (10)−0.0042 (8)0.0108 (8)−0.0040 (8)
C80.0234 (10)0.0245 (11)0.0186 (10)−0.0066 (9)0.0059 (8)−0.0026 (9)
S1—C21.761 (2)C1—H1B0.9800
S1—C11.799 (2)C1—H1C0.9800
O1—C81.233 (2)C3—C41.351 (3)
N1—C21.298 (3)C3—H3B0.9500
N1—C31.371 (3)C4—C51.415 (3)
N2—C21.413 (2)C4—H4A0.9500
N2—C51.414 (2)C6—C71.355 (3)
N2—C81.442 (2)C6—H6A0.9500
N3—C51.308 (3)C7—C81.398 (3)
N3—C61.365 (3)C7—H7A0.9500
C1—H1A0.9800
C2—S1—C199.03 (9)N1—C3—H3B118.2
C2—N1—C3118.60 (17)C3—C4—C5119.37 (18)
C2—N2—C5119.08 (16)C3—C4—H4A120.3
C2—N2—C8121.20 (16)C5—C4—H4A120.3
C5—N2—C8119.70 (16)N3—C5—N2123.26 (18)
C5—N3—C6117.29 (18)N3—C5—C4119.98 (18)
S1—C1—H1A109.5N2—C5—C4116.76 (17)
S1—C1—H1B109.5C7—C6—N3123.66 (19)
H1A—C1—H1B109.5C7—C6—H6A118.2
S1—C1—H1C109.5N3—C6—H6A118.2
H1A—C1—H1C109.5C6—C7—C8121.85 (18)
H1B—C1—H1C109.5C6—C7—H7A119.1
N1—C2—N2122.57 (17)C8—C7—H7A119.1
N1—C2—S1118.33 (15)O1—C8—C7126.55 (18)
N2—C2—S1119.10 (14)O1—C8—N2119.26 (18)
C4—C3—N1123.53 (18)C7—C8—N2114.19 (17)
C4—C3—H3B118.2
  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Statistical and theoretical investigations on the directionality of nonbonded S...O interactions. Implications for molecular design and protein engineering.

Authors:  Michio Iwaoka; Shinya Takemoto; Shuji Tomoda
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-09-04       Impact factor: 15.419

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.