Literature DB >> 21577931

3-(1H-Imidazol-1-yl)propane-nitrile.

Tim Peppel1, Martin Köckerling.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(6)H(7)N(3), has an ethyl-ene group connecting an imidazole ring and a -CN group. These groups are in a staggered conformation. The shortest inter-molecular contact is found between the imidazole N atom and a -CH(2)- group of a neighboring mol-ecule.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21577931      PMCID: PMC2970166          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809035685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background and applications of ionic liquids, see: Hayashi et al. (2006 ▶); Kozlova et al. (2009a ▶,b ▶); Lombardo et al. (2007 ▶); Macaev et al. (2007 ▶); Sawa & Okamura (1969 ▶); Scheers et al. (2008 ▶); Visser et al. (2001 ▶); Wang et al. (2003 ▶); Wasserscheid & Keim (2000 ▶); Xu et al. (2007 ▶); Yamauchi & Masui (1976 ▶); Yang et al. (2006 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C6H7N3 M = 121.15 Monoclinic, a = 7.2712 (3) Å b = 5.5917 (2) Å c = 15.4625 (5) Å β = 100.979 (1)° V = 617.17 (4) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.09 mm−1 T = 173 K 0.45 × 0.40 × 0.30 mm

Data collection

Bruker–Nonius X8 APEX diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007 ▶) T min = 0.946, T max = 0.975 11604 measured reflections 1542 independent reflections 1456 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.018

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.032 wR(F 2) = 0.086 S = 1.04 1542 reflections 111 parameters All H-atom parameters refined Δρmax = 0.27 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.16 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: ct.exe (Köckerling, 1996 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809035685/om2269sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809035685/om2269Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H7N3Dx = 1.304 Mg m3
Mr = 121.15Melting point: 310 K
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.2712 (3) ÅCell parameters from 8906 reflections
b = 5.5917 (2) Åθ = 2.7–28.3°
c = 15.4625 (5) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
β = 100.979 (1)°T = 173 K
V = 617.17 (4) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.45 × 0.40 × 0.30 mm
F(000) = 256
Bruker–Nonius X8 Apex diffractometer1542 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1456 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.018
φ and ω scansθmax = 28.3°, θmin = 3.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007)h = −9→9
Tmin = 0.946, Tmax = 0.975k = −7→7
11604 measured reflectionsl = −20→16
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032All H-atom parameters refined
wR(F2) = 0.086w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0486P)2 + 0.1206P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.04(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1542 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.27 e Å3
111 parametersΔρmin = −0.16 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.064 (15)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.76561 (9)0.2518 (1)0.30688 (4)0.0207 (2)
C10.6541 (1)0.1964 (2)0.22892 (5)0.0254 (2)
H10.579 (2)0.053 (2)0.2217 (7)0.033 (3)*
N20.6623 (1)0.3580 (1)0.16800 (4)0.0302 (2)
C20.7866 (1)0.5266 (2)0.20919 (6)0.0281 (2)
H20.817 (2)0.670 (2)0.1771 (8)0.037 (3)*
C30.8519 (1)0.4648 (1)0.29465 (5)0.0249 (2)
H30.944 (2)0.535 (2)0.3408 (8)0.035 (3)*
C40.7876 (1)0.1115 (1)0.38757 (5)0.0239 (2)
H4A0.919 (2)0.109 (2)0.4147 (7)0.030 (3)*
H4B0.744 (2)−0.051 (2)0.3700 (7)0.031 (3)*
C50.6708 (1)0.2069 (2)0.45232 (5)0.0254 (2)
H5A0.683 (2)0.100 (2)0.5022 (8)0.037 (3)*
H5B0.538 (2)0.217 (2)0.4243 (7)0.035 (3)*
C60.7298 (1)0.4436 (2)0.48692 (5)0.0244 (2)
N30.7779 (1)0.6275 (1)0.51425 (5)0.0333 (2)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0242 (3)0.0212 (3)0.0176 (3)0.0012 (2)0.0061 (2)0.0007 (2)
C10.0293 (4)0.0279 (4)0.0194 (4)0.0001 (3)0.0057 (3)−0.0026 (3)
N20.0345 (4)0.0371 (4)0.0196 (3)0.0033 (3)0.0064 (3)0.0029 (3)
C20.0290 (4)0.0307 (4)0.0271 (4)0.0027 (3)0.0113 (3)0.0075 (3)
C30.0246 (4)0.0249 (4)0.0257 (4)−0.0015 (3)0.0065 (3)0.0023 (3)
C40.0318 (4)0.0213 (4)0.0188 (3)0.0026 (3)0.0058 (3)0.0025 (3)
C50.0321 (4)0.0265 (4)0.0190 (4)−0.0056 (3)0.0084 (3)−0.0011 (3)
C60.0265 (4)0.0288 (4)0.0186 (3)0.0011 (3)0.0060 (3)−0.0002 (3)
N30.0386 (4)0.0303 (4)0.0313 (4)−0.0002 (3)0.0078 (3)−0.0047 (3)
N1—C11.354 (1)C6—N31.141 (1)
N1—C31.376 (1)C1—H10.97 (1)
N1—C41.4565 (9)C2—H20.99 (1)
C1—N21.315 (1)C3—H30.97 (1)
N2—C21.376 (1)C4—H4A0.97 (1)
C2—C31.361 (1)C4—H4B0.99 (1)
C4—C51.527 (1)C5—H5A0.97 (1)
C5—C61.461 (1)C5—H5B0.98 (1)
C1—N1—C3106.68 (6)H2—C2—N2120.9 (7)
C1—N1—C4126.06 (7)H3—C3—C2132.8 (7)
C3—N1—C4127.27 (7)H3—C3—N1121.4 (7)
N2—C1—N1112.30 (7)H4A—C4—H4B110.4 (9)
C1—N2—C2104.76 (7)H4A—C4—N1108.5 (7)
C3—C2—N2110.64 (7)H4B—C4—N1106.5 (7)
C2—C3—N1105.63 (7)H4A—C4—C5110.2 (7)
N1—C4—C5112.92 (6)H4B—C4—C5108.2 (7)
C6—C5—C4113.28 (7)H5A—C5—H5B109 (1)
N3—C6—C5179.24 (9)H5A—C5—C6107.0 (7)
H1—C1—N2126.2 (7)H5B—C5—C6107.9 (7)
H1—C1—N1121.5 (7)H5A—C5—C4109.2 (7)
H2—C2—C3128.4 (7)H5B—C5—C4110.7 (7)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C5—H5A···N2i0.97 (1)2.66 (1)3.366 (1)135.7 (9)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
C5—H5A⋯N2i0.97 (1)2.66 (1)3.366 (1)135.7 (9)

Symmetry code: (i) .

  3 in total

1.  Ionic Liquids-New "Solutions" for Transition Metal Catalysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2000-11-03       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Gelation of ionic liquid-based electrolytes with silica nanoparticles for quasi-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells.

Authors:  Peng Wang; Shaik M Zakeeruddin; Pascal Comte; Ivan Exnar; Michael Grätzel
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-02-05       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.