Literature DB >> 21577878

4-Bromo-3-methyl-anilinium hydrogen sulfate.

Li Zhang1.   

Abstract

In the cation of the title compound, C(7)H(9)BrN(+)·HSO(4) (-), the amino N atom is protonated. In the crystal, inter-molecular O-H⋯O and N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds generate an infinite two-dimensional network parallel to (001).

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21577878      PMCID: PMC2970329          DOI: 10.1107/S160053680903493X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the structures of amino derivatives, see: Fu et al. (2007 ▶, 2008 ▶); Fu & Xiong (2008 ▶). Amino derivatives are used in the construction of metal-organic frameworks. For applications of metal-organic coordination compounds, see: Chen et al. (2001 ▶); Xiong et al. (1999 ▶); Xie et al. (2002 ▶); Zhao et al. (2004 ▶); Wang et al. (2002 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H9BrNHSO4 M = 284.13 Triclinic, a = 4.9448 (10) Å b = 6.4084 (13) Å c = 16.674 (3) Å α = 98.92 (3)° β = 96.22 (3)° γ = 100.01 (3)° V = 509.04 (17) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 4.23 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.40 × 0.05 × 0.05 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.910, T max = 1.000 5279 measured reflections 2323 independent reflections 1804 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.053

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.049 wR(F 2) = 0.115 S = 1.07 2323 reflections 129 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.40 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.67 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680903493X/pv2203sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680903493X/pv2203Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H9BrN+·HSO4Z = 2
Mr = 284.13F(000) = 284
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.854 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 4.9448 (10) ÅCell parameters from 1804 reflections
b = 6.4084 (13) Åθ = 3.3–27.5°
c = 16.674 (3) ŵ = 4.23 mm1
α = 98.92 (3)°T = 298 K
β = 96.22 (3)°Block, colorless
γ = 100.01 (3)°0.40 × 0.05 × 0.05 mm
V = 509.04 (17) Å3
Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer2323 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1804 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.053
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.3°
CCD profile fitting scansh = −6→6
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)k = −8→8
Tmin = 0.910, Tmax = 1.000l = −21→21
5279 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.049Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.115H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.07w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0426P)2 + 0.1536P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2323 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
129 parametersΔρmax = 0.40 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.67 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.74330 (10)0.74731 (8)0.96412 (3)0.0635 (2)
N10.0682 (6)0.3866 (4)0.63055 (17)0.0278 (6)
H1A−0.04520.47410.61820.042*
H1B−0.03080.25610.62990.042*
H1C0.18570.37820.59390.042*
C10.5271 (7)0.6260 (6)0.8613 (2)0.0355 (8)
C40.2233 (7)0.4704 (5)0.7120 (2)0.0273 (7)
C50.4016 (7)0.3520 (5)0.7448 (2)0.0290 (7)
H50.41540.21930.71560.035*
C30.1915 (7)0.6643 (5)0.7535 (2)0.0329 (8)
H30.06960.74180.73090.039*
C60.5593 (7)0.4282 (6)0.8206 (2)0.0309 (8)
C20.3444 (8)0.7420 (6)0.8295 (2)0.0404 (9)
H20.32470.87230.85940.049*
C70.7547 (8)0.2971 (7)0.8549 (3)0.0458 (10)
H7A0.94110.37820.86350.069*
H7B0.74310.16590.81690.069*
H7C0.70430.26380.90610.069*
S10.37322 (15)0.18764 (12)0.42345 (5)0.0231 (2)
O10.6927 (5)0.1969 (4)0.43590 (16)0.0379 (6)
H10.72570.09320.45580.057*
O20.2512 (6)0.0108 (4)0.35840 (16)0.0433 (7)
O30.3537 (5)0.3945 (3)0.40391 (16)0.0328 (6)
O40.2770 (5)0.1540 (4)0.50052 (14)0.0305 (5)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.0640 (3)0.0704 (4)0.0396 (3)−0.0081 (2)−0.0124 (2)−0.0034 (2)
N10.0312 (15)0.0272 (15)0.0268 (14)0.0091 (11)0.0038 (11)0.0062 (12)
C10.0342 (19)0.038 (2)0.0290 (18)−0.0039 (15)0.0024 (15)0.0041 (16)
C40.0278 (17)0.0235 (17)0.0296 (18)0.0015 (13)0.0040 (13)0.0058 (14)
C50.0307 (17)0.0267 (17)0.0319 (18)0.0076 (14)0.0071 (14)0.0080 (15)
C30.0350 (19)0.0261 (18)0.038 (2)0.0064 (14)0.0067 (15)0.0066 (16)
C60.0254 (17)0.0352 (19)0.0342 (19)0.0017 (14)0.0067 (14)0.0156 (16)
C20.050 (2)0.0265 (19)0.041 (2)0.0040 (16)0.0063 (18)−0.0014 (17)
C70.044 (2)0.055 (3)0.043 (2)0.0132 (18)−0.0031 (18)0.023 (2)
S10.0207 (4)0.0192 (4)0.0313 (4)0.0042 (3)0.0043 (3)0.0091 (3)
O10.0225 (12)0.0427 (15)0.0590 (17)0.0108 (10)0.0136 (11)0.0304 (13)
O20.0570 (17)0.0272 (13)0.0392 (15)−0.0020 (11)0.0044 (13)−0.0009 (12)
O30.0303 (13)0.0235 (12)0.0486 (15)0.0056 (10)0.0055 (11)0.0181 (11)
O40.0318 (13)0.0285 (13)0.0369 (14)0.0092 (10)0.0122 (10)0.0145 (11)
Br1—C11.894 (4)C3—H30.9300
N1—C41.458 (4)C6—C71.509 (5)
N1—H1A0.8900C2—H20.9300
N1—H1B0.8900C7—H7A0.9600
N1—H1C0.8900C7—H7B0.9600
C1—C21.379 (6)C7—H7C0.9600
C1—C61.386 (5)S1—O31.430 (2)
C4—C31.369 (5)S1—O21.437 (3)
C4—C51.382 (5)S1—O41.452 (2)
C5—C61.380 (5)S1—O11.560 (2)
C5—H50.9300O1—H10.8200
C3—C21.376 (5)
C4—N1—H1A109.5C5—C6—C7119.9 (3)
C4—N1—H1B109.5C1—C6—C7123.4 (3)
H1A—N1—H1B109.5C3—C2—C1119.8 (3)
C4—N1—H1C109.5C3—C2—H2120.1
H1A—N1—H1C109.5C1—C2—H2120.1
H1B—N1—H1C109.5C6—C7—H7A109.5
C2—C1—C6122.6 (3)C6—C7—H7B109.5
C2—C1—Br1117.8 (3)H7A—C7—H7B109.5
C6—C1—Br1119.6 (3)C6—C7—H7C109.5
C3—C4—C5121.7 (3)H7A—C7—H7C109.5
C3—C4—N1119.5 (3)H7B—C7—H7C109.5
C5—C4—N1118.8 (3)O3—S1—O2114.06 (16)
C6—C5—C4120.8 (3)O3—S1—O4113.59 (14)
C6—C5—H5119.6O2—S1—O4111.41 (15)
C4—C5—H5119.6O3—S1—O1102.60 (13)
C4—C3—C2118.4 (3)O2—S1—O1107.73 (16)
C4—C3—H3120.8O4—S1—O1106.61 (14)
C2—C3—H3120.8S1—O1—H1109.5
C5—C6—C1116.7 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O3i0.891.902.767 (3)166
N1—H1B···O2ii0.891.912.797 (4)173
O1—H1···O4iii0.821.842.650 (3)168
N1—H1C···O40.892.092.829 (4)140
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O3i0.891.902.767 (3)166
N1—H1B⋯O2ii0.891.912.797 (4)173
O1—H1⋯O4iii0.821.842.650 (3)168
N1—H1C⋯O40.892.092.829 (4)140

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  4 in total

1.  Dielectric anisotropy of a homochiral trinuclear nickel(II) complex.

Authors:  Da-Wei Fu; Yu-Mei Song; Guo-Xi Wang; Qiong Ye; Ren-Gen Xiong; Tomoyuki Akutagawa; Takayoshi Nakamura; Philip Wai Hong Chan; Songping D Huang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  The first metal-organic framework (MOF) of Imazethapyr and its SHG, piezoelectric and ferroelectric properties.

Authors:  Da-Wei Fu; Wen Zhang; Ren-Gen Xiong
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 4.390

4.  Two chiral coordination polymers: preparation and X-ray structures of mono(4-sulfo-L-phenylalanine)(diaqua) zinc(II) and copper(II) complexes.

Authors:  Yong-Rong Xie; Ren-Gen Xiong; Xiang Xue; Xue-Tai Chen; Ziling Xue; Xiao-Zeng You
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 5.165

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.