Literature DB >> 21577743

Poly[di-μ(2)-chlorido(μ(2)-1,3-di-4-pyridylpropane-κN:N')lead(II)].

Zhiyong Fu1, Dongpo Su, Desheng Song.   

Abstract

The title Pb(II) coordination polymer, [PbCl(2)(C(13)H(14)N(2))], was prepared by the hydro-thermal reaction of PbCl(2) with 4,4,-trimethyl-enedipyridine in a 1:1 ratio. It exhibits a two-dimensional layered structural motif consisting of PbCl(2) chains and the flexible bridged 4,4'-trimethyl-enedipyridine ligand. The connections result in a cavity of about 4 × 15 Å.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21577743      PMCID: PMC2970293          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809036150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For crystal engineering based upon transition metal coordination polymers, see: Abrahams et al. (1999 ▶). For applications of these metal-organic frameworks, see: Moulton & Zaworotko (2001 ▶); Natarajan & Mahata (2009 ▶). For networks with main group metals as connected nodes, see: Shi et al. (2002 ▶). For the related structure, [PbCl2(4,4′-bipy)] (bipy is bipyridine), see: Nordell et al. (2004 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[PbCl2(C13H14N2)] M = 476.35 Monoclinic, a = 4.385 (2) Å b = 15.455 (3) Å c = 10.935 (2) Å β = 97.65 (2)° V = 734.5 (3) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 11.84 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.19 × 0.15 × 0.11 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.139, T max = 0.277 2401 measured reflections 1283 independent reflections 1109 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.033

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.033 wR(F 2) = 0.077 S = 1.01 1283 reflections 88 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.88 e Å−3 Δρmin = −1.16 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1996 ▶); cell refinement: SMART and SAINT (Bruker, 1996 ▶); data reduction: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809036150/pb2006sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809036150/pb2006Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[PbCl2(C13H14N2)]F(000) = 444
Mr = 476.35Dx = 2.155 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/mMelting point: 533.15K K
Hall symbol: -P2ybMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 4.385 (2) ÅCell parameters from 1283 reflections
b = 15.455 (3) Åθ = 2.6–25.0°
c = 10.935 (2) ŵ = 11.84 mm1
β = 97.65 (2)°T = 298 K
V = 734.5 (3) Å3Block, yellow
Z = 20.19 × 0.15 × 0.11 mm
Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer1283 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1109 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.033
ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −5→5
Tmin = 0.139, Tmax = 0.277k = −15→18
2401 measured reflectionsl = −7→12
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.077H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.01w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0359P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1283 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
88 parametersΔρmax = 0.88 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −1.16 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Pb10.32077 (9)0.75000.28349 (4)0.03780 (17)
Cl20.7798 (10)0.75000.1052 (3)0.0748 (10)
Cl1−0.1094 (10)0.75000.4619 (3)0.0719 (10)
C50.6217 (18)0.4150 (5)0.2292 (8)0.0431 (19)
N10.3822 (16)0.5787 (4)0.2702 (7)0.0482 (17)
C20.412 (2)0.4554 (5)0.1409 (8)0.049 (2)
H2A0.34810.42780.06620.059*
C30.574 (2)0.5401 (5)0.3555 (8)0.057 (2)
H3A0.62880.56840.43030.068*
C10.297 (2)0.5358 (5)0.1631 (8)0.049 (2)
H1A0.15730.56160.10260.059*
C60.770 (2)0.3312 (5)0.2033 (9)0.055 (2)
H6A0.97110.32830.25270.066*
H6B0.80240.33020.11710.066*
C310.698 (2)0.4595 (5)0.3397 (9)0.055 (2)
H3B0.83350.43490.40300.066*
C70.584 (2)0.25000.2302 (11)0.040 (3)
H7A0.38630.25000.17830.048*
H7C0.54740.25000.31590.048*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Pb10.0342 (2)0.0274 (2)0.0527 (3)0.0000.00873 (17)0.000
Cl20.095 (3)0.082 (2)0.047 (2)0.0000.0061 (17)0.000
Cl10.102 (3)0.065 (2)0.048 (2)0.0000.0045 (18)0.000
C50.043 (5)0.026 (4)0.066 (6)−0.005 (3)0.027 (4)0.002 (4)
N10.057 (4)0.027 (3)0.062 (5)0.006 (3)0.016 (4)0.006 (3)
C20.062 (5)0.032 (4)0.052 (5)−0.003 (4)0.008 (4)−0.003 (4)
C30.081 (7)0.032 (4)0.056 (6)0.002 (4)0.003 (5)−0.001 (4)
C10.053 (5)0.032 (4)0.059 (6)−0.002 (4)−0.002 (4)0.009 (4)
C60.056 (5)0.032 (4)0.083 (7)−0.002 (4)0.029 (5)0.004 (4)
C310.060 (6)0.040 (4)0.066 (6)−0.007 (4)0.005 (5)0.006 (4)
C70.035 (6)0.023 (5)0.064 (7)0.0000.012 (5)0.000
Pb1—N1i2.667 (7)C2—C11.374 (10)
Pb1—N12.667 (7)C2—H2A0.9300
Pb1—Cl2ii2.862 (6)C3—C311.379 (11)
Pb1—Cl12.887 (5)C3—H3A0.9300
Pb1—Cl1iii2.957 (6)C1—H1A0.9300
Pb1—Cl22.982 (6)C6—C71.548 (10)
Cl2—Pb1iii2.862 (6)C6—H6A0.9700
Cl1—Pb1ii2.957 (6)C6—H6B0.9700
C5—C311.392 (12)C31—H3B0.9300
C5—C21.390 (12)C7—C6iv1.548 (10)
C5—C61.494 (11)C7—H7A0.9700
N1—C31.313 (11)C7—H7C0.9700
N1—C11.354 (11)
N1i—Pb1—N1166.1 (3)C1—C2—H2A119.8
N1i—Pb1—Cl2ii92.49 (16)C5—C2—H2A119.8
N1—Pb1—Cl2ii92.49 (16)N1—C3—C31123.2 (8)
N1i—Pb1—Cl196.69 (14)N1—C3—H3A118.4
N1—Pb1—Cl196.69 (14)C31—C3—H3A118.4
Cl2ii—Pb1—Cl184.43 (17)N1—C1—C2122.1 (7)
N1i—Pb1—Cl1iii87.32 (16)N1—C1—H1A119.0
N1—Pb1—Cl1iii87.32 (16)C2—C1—H1A119.0
Cl2ii—Pb1—Cl1iii178.36 (9)C5—C6—C7114.3 (7)
Cl1—Pb1—Cl1iii97.21 (17)C5—C6—H6A108.7
N1i—Pb1—Cl283.26 (14)C7—C6—H6A108.7
N1—Pb1—Cl283.26 (14)C5—C6—H6B108.7
Cl2ii—Pb1—Cl297.21 (17)C7—C6—H6B108.7
Cl1—Pb1—Cl2178.36 (11)H6A—C6—H6B107.6
Cl1iii—Pb1—Cl281.15 (17)C3—C31—C5120.1 (8)
Pb1iii—Cl2—Pb197.21 (17)C3—C31—H3B120.0
Pb1—Cl1—Pb1ii97.21 (17)C5—C31—H3B120.0
C31—C5—C2116.2 (7)C6—C7—C6iv108.3 (9)
C31—C5—C6122.2 (8)C6—C7—H7A110.0
C2—C5—C6121.5 (8)C6iv—C7—H7A110.0
C3—N1—C1117.9 (7)C6—C7—H7C110.0
C3—N1—Pb1118.2 (6)C6iv—C7—H7C110.0
C1—N1—Pb1121.0 (5)H7A—C7—H7C108.4
C1—C2—C5120.5 (8)
  3 in total

1.  From molecules to crystal engineering: supramolecular isomerism and polymorphism in network solids.

Authors:  B Moulton; M J Zaworotko
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Metal-organic framework structures--how closely are they related to classical inorganic structures?

Authors:  Srinivasan Natarajan; Partha Mahata
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 54.564

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.