Literature DB >> 21577699

Bis[5-(2-amino-3-pyrid-yl)tetra-zolato]copper(II).

Min Guo1.   

Abstract

In the centrosymmetric title complex, [Cu(C(6)H(5)N(6))(2)], the Cu(II) ion is coordinated by four N atoms from two symmetry-related bidentate 5-(2-amino-3-pyrid-yl)tetra-zolate ligands in a slightly distorted square-planar environment. There are weak intra-molecular N-H⋯N hydrogen bonds between the two ligands. In the crystal structure, there are significant π-π stacking inter-actions between symmetry-related tetra-zole and pyridine rings, with a centroid-centroid distance of 3.6025 (18)°.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21577699      PMCID: PMC2970265          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809034369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the coordination chemistry of tetra­zole compounds, see: Butler (1984 ▶); Zhao et al. (2008 ▶). For the in situ [2 + 3] cyclo­addition synthesis of tetra­zole coordination polymers, see: Xiong et al. (2002 ▶); Ye et al. (2006 ▶); Fu et al. (2008 ▶). For coordination polymers synthesized with similar organic ligand derivatives, see: Ye et al. (2005 ▶); Bhandari et al. (2000 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[Cu(C6H5N6)2] M = 385.86 Monoclinic, a = 6.6492 (6) Å b = 7.9093 (7) Å c = 13.5581 (12) Å β = 100.692 (2)° V = 700.65 (11) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 1.59 mm−1 T = 294 K 0.15 × 0.13 × 0.09 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.797, T max = 0.870 3743 measured reflections 1363 independent reflections 1228 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.020

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.040 wR(F 2) = 0.109 S = 1.07 1363 reflections 115 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.69 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.73 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809034369/lh2827sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809034369/lh2827Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Cu(C6H5N6)2]F(000) = 390
Mr = 385.86Dx = 1.829 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMelting point: 723 K
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 6.6492 (6) ÅCell parameters from 2942 reflections
b = 7.9093 (7) Åθ = 3.0–27.5°
c = 13.5581 (12) ŵ = 1.59 mm1
β = 100.692 (2)°T = 294 K
V = 700.65 (11) Å3Rectangle, green
Z = 20.15 × 0.13 × 0.09 mm
Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer1363 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1228 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.020
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 3.0°
ω scansh = −8→7
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)k = −8→9
Tmin = 0.797, Tmax = 0.870l = −15→16
3743 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.109H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.07w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0555P)2 + 1.0273P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1363 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
115 parametersΔρmax = 0.69 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.73 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu10.50000.50000.50000.0265 (2)
N61.0060 (4)0.1967 (3)0.61317 (18)0.0302 (6)
C60.7920 (5)0.3986 (4)0.3685 (2)0.0260 (6)
C50.9283 (4)0.3088 (4)0.4476 (2)0.0263 (6)
N40.6177 (4)0.4748 (3)0.37835 (19)0.0294 (6)
C40.8741 (5)0.2899 (4)0.5446 (2)0.0258 (6)
N30.8245 (4)0.4167 (4)0.27476 (19)0.0345 (6)
C31.1079 (5)0.2369 (4)0.4307 (2)0.0322 (7)
H3A1.14390.24970.36800.039*
N20.5399 (4)0.5422 (4)0.2875 (2)0.0365 (6)
C21.2364 (5)0.1461 (4)0.5041 (3)0.0364 (7)
H2A1.35760.09970.49140.044*
C11.1816 (5)0.1263 (4)0.5947 (2)0.0349 (7)
H1A1.26460.06420.64460.042*
N10.6643 (5)0.5072 (4)0.2266 (2)0.0385 (7)
N50.7116 (4)0.3534 (3)0.56979 (17)0.0291 (6)
H5A0.75850.40760.62790.035*
H5B0.64310.26290.58660.035*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.0241 (3)0.0352 (3)0.0227 (3)0.00433 (19)0.0104 (2)0.00138 (19)
N60.0281 (14)0.0330 (14)0.0300 (13)0.0006 (10)0.0068 (11)0.0029 (10)
C60.0267 (15)0.0296 (14)0.0243 (13)−0.0035 (11)0.0112 (11)−0.0035 (11)
C50.0250 (15)0.0270 (14)0.0292 (15)−0.0012 (11)0.0108 (12)−0.0019 (11)
N40.0280 (14)0.0395 (14)0.0223 (12)0.0041 (11)0.0087 (10)0.0012 (10)
C40.0239 (15)0.0258 (14)0.0286 (14)−0.0029 (11)0.0076 (12)0.0000 (11)
N30.0342 (15)0.0477 (16)0.0248 (12)0.0030 (12)0.0137 (11)−0.0019 (11)
C30.0325 (17)0.0347 (16)0.0328 (16)0.0011 (13)0.0151 (13)−0.0031 (13)
N20.0353 (16)0.0513 (16)0.0245 (13)0.0073 (13)0.0100 (11)0.0046 (12)
C20.0280 (16)0.0374 (17)0.0464 (18)0.0065 (13)0.0141 (14)−0.0028 (14)
C10.0297 (17)0.0334 (16)0.0393 (17)0.0024 (12)0.0002 (13)0.0015 (13)
N10.0365 (17)0.0561 (19)0.0242 (13)0.0054 (12)0.0092 (12)0.0040 (11)
N50.0277 (14)0.0401 (15)0.0229 (11)0.0069 (11)0.0135 (10)0.0056 (10)
Cu1—N5i1.930 (2)N4—N21.354 (4)
Cu1—N51.930 (2)C4—N51.293 (4)
Cu1—N41.963 (2)N3—N11.348 (4)
Cu1—N4i1.963 (2)C3—C21.386 (5)
N6—C11.358 (4)C3—H3A0.9300
N6—C41.369 (4)N2—N11.302 (4)
C6—N41.335 (4)C2—C11.354 (5)
C6—N31.336 (4)C2—H2A0.9300
C6—C51.455 (4)C1—H1A0.9300
C5—C31.380 (4)N5—H5A0.9000
C5—C41.435 (4)N5—H5B0.9000
N5i—Cu1—N5180C6—N3—N1105.3 (2)
N5i—Cu1—N490.97 (10)C5—C3—C2122.1 (3)
N5—Cu1—N489.03 (10)C5—C3—H3A118.9
N5i—Cu1—N4i89.03 (10)C2—C3—H3A118.9
N5—Cu1—N4i90.97 (10)N1—N2—N4108.2 (3)
N4—Cu1—N4i180C1—C2—C3118.5 (3)
C1—N6—C4124.1 (3)C1—C2—H2A120.7
N4—C6—N3110.1 (3)C3—C2—H2A120.7
N4—C6—C5125.5 (3)C2—C1—N6120.3 (3)
N3—C6—C5124.4 (3)C2—C1—H1A119.8
C3—C5—C4118.8 (3)N6—C1—H1A119.8
C3—C5—C6121.3 (3)N2—N1—N3110.1 (3)
C4—C5—C6119.9 (3)C4—N5—Cu1132.2 (2)
C6—N4—N2106.2 (2)C4—N5—H5A104.2
C6—N4—Cu1128.3 (2)Cu1—N5—H5A104.2
N2—N4—Cu1125.5 (2)C4—N5—H5B104.2
N5—C4—N6119.4 (3)Cu1—N5—H5B104.2
N5—C4—C5124.5 (3)H5A—N5—H5B105.5
N6—C4—C5116.1 (3)
N4—C6—C5—C3−178.6 (3)C6—C5—C4—N6176.9 (3)
N3—C6—C5—C31.2 (5)N4—C6—N3—N10.1 (3)
N4—C6—C5—C43.1 (4)C5—C6—N3—N1−179.8 (3)
N3—C6—C5—C4−177.1 (3)C4—C5—C3—C20.5 (5)
N3—C6—N4—N20.1 (4)C6—C5—C3—C2−177.8 (3)
C5—C6—N4—N2179.9 (3)C6—N4—N2—N1−0.2 (4)
N3—C6—N4—Cu1−176.5 (2)Cu1—N4—N2—N1176.5 (2)
C5—C6—N4—Cu13.4 (4)C5—C3—C2—C10.8 (5)
N5—Cu1—N4—C6−7.2 (3)C3—C2—C1—N6−1.1 (5)
N5—Cu1—N4—N2176.9 (3)C4—N6—C1—C20.1 (5)
C1—N6—C4—N5−179.3 (3)N4—N2—N1—N30.2 (4)
C1—N6—C4—C51.2 (4)C6—N3—N1—N2−0.2 (4)
C3—C5—C4—N5179.0 (3)N6—C4—N5—Cu1175.8 (2)
C6—C5—C4—N5−2.6 (4)C5—C4—N5—Cu1−4.7 (5)
C3—C5—C4—N6−1.4 (4)N4—Cu1—N5—C48.1 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N5—H5A···N2i0.902.502.902 (4)108
Table 1

Selected bond angles (°)

N5i—Cu1—N5180
N5—Cu1—N489.03 (10)
N5—Cu1—N4i90.97 (10)
N4—Cu1—N4i180

Symmetry code: (i) .

Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N5—H5A⋯N2i0.902.502.902 (4)108

Symmetry code: (i) .

  6 in total

1.  Novel, acentric metal-organic coordination polymers from hydrothermal reactions involving in situ ligand synthesis.

Authors:  Ren-Gen Xiong; Xiang Xue; Hong Zhao; Xiao-Zeng You; Brendan F Abrahams; Ziling Xue
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2002-10-18       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  A second-order nonlinear optical material prepared through in situ hydrothermal ligand synthesis.

Authors:  Qiong Ye; Yong-Hua Li; Yu-Mei Song; Xue-Feng Huang; Ren-Gen Xiong; Ziling Xue
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2005-05-16       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  Ferroelectric metal-organic framework with a high dielectric constant.

Authors:  Qiong Ye; Yu-Mei Song; Guo-Xi Wang; Kai Chen; Da-Wei Fu; Philip Wai Hong Chan; Jin-Song Zhu; Songping D Huang; Ren-Gen Xiong
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

Review 5.  In situ hydrothermal synthesis of tetrazole coordination polymers with interesting physical properties.

Authors:  Hong Zhao; Zhi-Rong Qu; Heng-Yun Ye; Ren-Gen Xiong
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 54.564

6.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.