Literature DB >> 21577638

2-Bromo-maleic acid.

Andreas Fischer1.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(4)H(3)BrO(4), was obtained from a solution of meso-2,3-dibromo-succinic acid and vanadium(IV) oxide. The crystals are isostructural with chloro-maleic acid and the mol-ecule has two geometrically different carboxyl groups, one of which has delocalized C-O bonds and is essentially coplanar with the olefinic bond plane [give dihedral angle 15.08 (16)°], whereas the other has a localized C=O bond and forms a dihedral angle of 99.6 (3)° with the C=C bond plane. Two symmetry-independent O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds link the mol-ecules into layers parallel to the bc plane.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21577638      PMCID: PMC2969897          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809029602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the structure of chloro­maleic acid, see: Wong et al. (2006 ▶). For the synthesis and structure of 2-bromo­fumaric acid, see: Fischer (2006 ▶). For the structure and polymorphism of maleic acid, see: Day et al. (2006 ▶). For the structure of 2-methyl­maleic acid, see: Batchelor & Jones (1998 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C4H3BrO4 M = 194.97 Monoclinic, a = 7.5074 (12) Å b = 4.9272 (6) Å c = 16.966 (4) Å β = 94.213 (12)° V = 625.9 (2) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 6.50 mm−1 T = 299 K 0.15 × 0.13 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Bruker–Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer Absorption correction: numerical HABITUS (Herrendorf & Bärnighausen, 1997 ▶) T min = 0.325, T max = 0.455 8638 measured reflections 1420 independent reflections 1046 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.064

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.042 wR(F 2) = 0.075 S = 1.16 1420 reflections 84 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.63 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.43 e Å−3 Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1999 ▶); cell refinement: DIRAX (Duisenberg, 1992 ▶); data reduction: EVALCCD (Duisenberg et al., 2003 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809029602/ya2098sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809029602/ya2098Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C4H3BrO4F(000) = 376
Mr = 194.97Dx = 2.069 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 28 reflections
a = 7.5074 (12) Åθ = 5.6–19.2°
b = 4.9272 (6) ŵ = 6.50 mm1
c = 16.966 (4) ÅT = 299 K
β = 94.213 (12)°Block, colourless
V = 625.9 (2) Å30.15 × 0.13 × 0.10 mm
Z = 4
Bruker–Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer1046 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.064
φ and ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 4.7°
Absorption correction: numerical HABITUS (Herrendorf & Bärnighausen, 1997)h = −9→9
Tmin = 0.325, Tmax = 0.455k = −6→6
8638 measured reflectionsl = −17→22
1420 independent reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.075w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0113P)2 + 1.1107P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.16(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1420 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.63 e Å3
84 parametersΔρmin = −0.43 e Å3
0 restraints
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.7961 (5)0.0222 (7)0.6839 (2)0.0317 (8)
C20.6344 (4)−0.0621 (8)0.6312 (2)0.0330 (8)
C30.6332 (5)−0.2221 (8)0.5700 (2)0.0369 (9)
C40.7955 (5)−0.3400 (8)0.5399 (2)0.0369 (9)
Br10.42183 (5)0.08537 (10)0.66527 (3)0.05260 (18)
O10.8584 (3)−0.1231 (6)0.73530 (16)0.0440 (7)
O20.8501 (4)0.2664 (6)0.66922 (17)0.0493 (8)
O30.9456 (3)−0.2426 (6)0.56482 (17)0.0466 (7)
O40.7746 (4)−0.5294 (6)0.49066 (17)0.0482 (8)
H3A0.5236−0.26460.54390.044*
H20.93570.30490.70000.074*
H31.0256−0.32580.54490.070*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0278 (18)0.031 (2)0.036 (2)0.0046 (15)−0.0024 (15)−0.0024 (17)
C20.0275 (17)0.031 (2)0.039 (2)0.0043 (15)−0.0055 (14)0.0019 (19)
C30.0288 (19)0.035 (2)0.045 (2)−0.0016 (16)−0.0066 (16)−0.003 (2)
C40.0306 (19)0.040 (2)0.039 (2)−0.0025 (16)−0.0063 (16)0.0006 (19)
Br10.0335 (2)0.0616 (3)0.0615 (3)0.0137 (2)−0.00437 (17)−0.0122 (3)
O10.0380 (14)0.0415 (17)0.0498 (17)−0.0045 (12)−0.0160 (12)0.0119 (14)
O20.0504 (17)0.0353 (17)0.0578 (19)−0.0113 (13)−0.0256 (14)0.0076 (15)
O30.0332 (14)0.0487 (18)0.0578 (19)−0.0067 (13)0.0038 (13)−0.0141 (16)
O40.0408 (15)0.055 (2)0.0476 (17)0.0022 (13)−0.0058 (12)−0.0205 (15)
C1—O11.197 (4)C4—O41.254 (5)
C1—O21.299 (5)C4—O31.269 (4)
C1—C21.512 (5)C3—H3A0.9300
C2—C31.302 (5)O2—H20.8200
C2—Br11.883 (4)O3—H30.8200
C3—C41.475 (5)
O1—C1—O2125.6 (3)O4—C4—O3124.6 (4)
O1—C1—C2121.3 (3)O4—C4—C3117.3 (3)
O2—C1—C2112.9 (3)O3—C4—C3118.1 (4)
C3—C2—C1126.5 (3)C2—C3—H3A118.1
C3—C2—Br1121.5 (3)C4—C3—H3A118.1
C1—C2—Br1112.0 (3)C1—O2—H2109.5
C2—C3—C4123.9 (3)C4—O3—H3109.5
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H3···O4i0.821.802.617 (4)171
O2—H2···O1ii0.821.862.681 (4)176
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O3—H3⋯O4i0.821.802.617 (4)171
O2—H2⋯O1ii0.821.862.681 (4)176

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  3 in total

1.  Investigating the latent polymorphism of maleic acid.

Authors:  Graeme M Day; Andrew V Trask; W D Samuel Motherwell; William Jones
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Experimental and theoretical 17O NMR study of the influence of hydrogen-bonding on C=O and O-H oxygens in carboxylic solids.

Authors:  Alan Wong; Kevin J Pike; Rob Jenkins; Guy J Clarkson; Tiit Anupõld; Andrew P Howes; David H G Crout; Ago Samoson; Ray Dupree; Mark E Smith
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 2.781

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.