Literature DB >> 21577523

2,4-Diiodo-aniline.

Graham Smith1, Urs D Wermuth.   

Abstract

The structure of the title compound, C(6)H(5)I(2)N, shows a weak inter-molecular amine-amine N-H⋯N hydrogen-bonding inter-action, giving a helical chain which extends along the a axis. An intra-molecular N-H⋯I hydrogen bond is also observed.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21577523      PMCID: PMC2970149          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809030438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related structures, see: Garden et al. (2002 ▶). For the synthesis, see: Dains et al. (1935 ▶); Hodgson & Marsden (1937 ▶); O’Neil (2001 ▶). For graph-set analysis of hydrogen bonding, see: Etter et al. (1990 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C6H5I2N M = 344.91 Orthorhombic, a = 4.3870 (1) Å b = 10.9626 (3) Å c = 16.9778 (4) Å V = 816.51 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 7.62 mm−1 T = 200 K 0.30 × 0.18 × 0.18 mm

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Gemini-S Ultra CCD-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.146, T max = 0.250 6739 measured reflections 1873 independent reflections 1790 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.024

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.018 wR(F 2) = 0.038 S = 1.05 1873 reflections 90 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.38 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.47 e Å−3 Absolute structure: Flack (1983 ▶), 737 Friedel pairs Flack parameter: −0.03 (4) Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2008 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2008 ▶); data reduction: CrysAlis RED; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶) within WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶) within WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809030438/is2440sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809030438/is2440Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H5I2NDx = 2.806 Mg m3
Mr = 344.91Melting point = 368–369 K
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 5620 reflections
a = 4.3870 (1) Åθ = 3.0–32.2°
b = 10.9626 (3) ŵ = 7.62 mm1
c = 16.9778 (4) ÅT = 200 K
V = 816.51 (3) Å3Needle, colourless
Z = 40.30 × 0.18 × 0.18 mm
F(000) = 616
Oxford Diffraction Gemini-S Ultra CCD-detector diffractometer1873 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance (Mo) X-ray tube1790 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.024
ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −5→5
Tmin = 0.146, Tmax = 0.250k = −13→14
6739 measured reflectionsl = −22→18
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.018H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.038w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0207P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.05(Δ/σ)max = 0.003
1873 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.38 e Å3
90 parametersΔρmin = −0.47 e Å3
0 restraintsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 737 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsFlack parameter: −0.03 (4)
Geometry. Bond distances, angles etc. have been calculated using the rounded fractional coordinates. All su's are estimated from the variances of the (full) variance-covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account in the estimation of distances, angles and torsion angles
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
I20.57888 (5)0.42657 (2)1.08868 (1)0.0293 (1)
I40.48489 (5)0.28546 (2)0.75021 (1)0.0330 (1)
N10.1721 (9)0.6552 (3)1.0212 (2)0.0291 (11)
C10.2299 (7)0.5690 (3)0.9630 (2)0.0218 (9)
C20.4096 (8)0.4658 (3)0.97570 (19)0.0221 (9)
C30.4807 (8)0.3859 (3)0.9156 (2)0.0247 (9)
C40.3689 (8)0.4074 (3)0.8407 (2)0.0235 (10)
C50.1876 (8)0.5075 (3)0.8256 (2)0.0260 (11)
C60.1216 (9)0.5877 (3)0.8865 (2)0.0278 (11)
H30.602800.318200.925300.0300*
H50.110700.521000.775300.0310*
H60.001900.655800.876100.0330*
H110.190 (8)0.626 (3)1.062 (2)0.038 (9)*
H120.043 (8)0.704 (4)1.010 (2)0.040 (9)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
I20.0335 (1)0.0341 (1)0.0202 (1)0.0009 (1)−0.0038 (1)0.0021 (1)
I40.0383 (1)0.0389 (1)0.0219 (1)0.0022 (1)0.0017 (1)−0.0069 (1)
N10.037 (2)0.0222 (16)0.028 (2)0.0055 (15)−0.0021 (16)0.0013 (15)
C10.0214 (15)0.0191 (16)0.0248 (18)−0.0039 (15)0.0014 (14)0.0021 (14)
C20.0251 (16)0.0226 (16)0.0186 (17)−0.0034 (15)−0.0009 (14)0.0032 (11)
C30.0289 (18)0.0218 (14)0.0234 (17)−0.0007 (11)−0.0010 (16)0.0015 (12)
C40.0252 (17)0.0226 (18)0.0228 (18)−0.0031 (13)0.0028 (14)−0.0029 (13)
C50.027 (2)0.0313 (19)0.0197 (19)−0.0028 (14)−0.0018 (15)0.0044 (14)
C60.0323 (19)0.0236 (18)0.0276 (19)0.0028 (15)0.0007 (15)0.0051 (13)
I2—C22.101 (3)C2—C31.381 (5)
I4—C42.099 (3)C3—C41.383 (5)
N1—C11.391 (5)C4—C51.379 (5)
N1—H120.80 (4)C5—C61.388 (5)
N1—H110.77 (3)C3—H30.9300
C1—C61.398 (5)C5—H50.9300
C1—C21.396 (5)C6—H60.9300
H11—N1—H12124 (4)I4—C4—C3118.6 (2)
C1—N1—H11110 (3)C3—C4—C5120.7 (3)
C1—N1—H12114 (3)C4—C5—C6119.1 (3)
N1—C1—C6119.9 (3)C1—C6—C5121.9 (3)
N1—C1—C2123.0 (3)C2—C3—H3120.00
C2—C1—C6117.0 (3)C4—C3—H3120.00
I2—C2—C1120.4 (2)C4—C5—H5120.00
I2—C2—C3117.7 (2)C6—C5—H5121.00
C1—C2—C3121.9 (3)C1—C6—H6119.00
C2—C3—C4119.4 (3)C5—C6—H6119.00
I4—C4—C5120.7 (2)
N1—C1—C2—I25.0 (5)C1—C2—C3—C4−0.7 (5)
N1—C1—C2—C3−175.5 (3)C2—C3—C4—I4179.3 (3)
C6—C1—C2—I2−178.9 (2)C2—C3—C4—C50.0 (5)
C6—C1—C2—C30.6 (5)I4—C4—C5—C6−178.5 (3)
N1—C1—C6—C5176.5 (3)C3—C4—C5—C60.9 (5)
C2—C1—C6—C50.3 (5)C4—C5—C6—C1−1.0 (5)
I2—C2—C3—C4178.8 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H11···I20.77 (3)2.81 (3)3.283 (4)122 (3)
N1—H12···N1i0.80 (4)2.30 (4)3.106 (5)180 (5)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H11⋯I20.77 (3)2.81 (3)3.283 (4)122 (3)
N1—H12⋯N1i0.80 (4)2.30 (4)3.106 (5)180 (5)

Symmetry code: (i) .

  4 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Graph-set analysis of hydrogen-bond patterns in organic crystals.

Authors:  M C Etter; J C MacDonald; J Bernstein
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  1990-04-01

3.  Interplay of hydrogen bonds, iodo...nitro interactions and aromatic pi...pi stacking interactions in iodo-nitroanilines.

Authors:  Simon J Garden; Silvia P Fontes; James L Wardell; Janet M S Skakle; John N Low; Christopher Glidewell
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2002-07-30

4.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.