Literature DB >> 21577486

Ammonium salicylate: a synchrotron study.

Jae-Hyun Park Klepeis, William J Evans, Natalia Zaitseva, Eric Schwegler, Simon J Teat.   

Abstract

The structure of the title salt, NH(4) (+)·C(7)H(5)O(3) (-), is stabilized by substantial hydrogen bonding between ammonium cations and salicylate anions that links the components into a two-dimensional array.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21577486      PMCID: PMC2970122          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809029857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background to organic scintillators, see: Brooks (1979 ▶); Kaschuck et al. (2002 ▶); Kachuk & Esposito (2005 ▶). For the structures of salicylate salts, see: Wiesbrock & Schmidbaur (2003a ▶,b ▶); Dinnebier et al. (2002 ▶). For hydrogen bonding in salicylate compounds, see: Gellert & Hsu (1983 ▶); Drake et al. (1993 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

NH4C7H5O3 M = 155.15 Monoclinic, a = 6.0768 (6) Å b = 20.089 (2) Å c = 6.3353 (7) Å β = 102.768 (1)° V = 754.28 (14) Å3 Z = 4 Synchrotron radiation λ = 0.77490 Å μ = 0.13 mm−1 T = 150 K 0.40 × 0.20 × 0.06 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004 ▶) T min = 0.950, T max = 0.992 7758 measured reflections 2274 independent reflections 1939 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.053

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.049 wR(F 2) = 0.150 S = 1.10 2274 reflections 136 parameters All H-atom parameters refined Δρmax = 0.36 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.24 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2006 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2006 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809029857/tk2513sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809029857/tk2513Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
NH4+·C7H5O3F(000) = 328
Mr = 155.15Dx = 1.366 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nSynchrotron radiation, λ = 0.77490 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 3198 reflections
a = 6.0768 (6) Åθ = 3.8–33.5°
b = 20.089 (2) ŵ = 0.13 mm1
c = 6.3353 (7) ÅT = 150 K
β = 102.768 (1)°Plate, colorless
V = 754.28 (14) Å30.40 × 0.20 × 0.06 mm
Z = 4
Bruker APEXII diffractometer2274 independent reflections
Radiation source: 11.3.1 ALS, LBNL, CA1939 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Si (111)Rint = 0.053
ω scansθmax = 33.8°, θmin = 3.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004)h = −8→8
Tmin = 0.950, Tmax = 0.992k = −27→28
7758 measured reflectionsl = −9→8
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.049Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.150All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.10w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0888P)2 + 0.043P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2274 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.006
136 parametersΔρmax = 0.36 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.24 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.75801 (14)0.09351 (5)0.40962 (13)0.0303 (2)
O20.24729 (14)0.05282 (4)0.06590 (12)0.0292 (2)
O31.12089 (13)0.03981 (4)0.36657 (12)0.0283 (2)
N40.47360 (16)0.05050 (5)−0.26977 (15)0.0245 (2)
C10.76231 (17)0.12776 (5)0.22639 (17)0.0233 (2)
C20.5922 (2)0.17478 (6)0.1553 (2)0.0312 (3)
C30.5876 (2)0.21026 (6)−0.0326 (2)0.0347 (3)
C40.7494 (2)0.19945 (6)−0.1538 (2)0.0328 (3)
C50.91906 (19)0.15315 (5)−0.08247 (18)0.0273 (3)
C60.92866 (16)0.11662 (5)0.10730 (16)0.0211 (2)
C71.11200 (16)0.06636 (5)0.18209 (15)0.0217 (2)
H10.884 (3)0.0660 (9)0.429 (3)0.048 (5)*
H20.482 (3)0.1790 (8)0.247 (2)0.033 (4)*
H30.461 (4)0.2423 (10)−0.088 (3)0.061 (5)*
H40.742 (3)0.2241 (9)−0.283 (3)0.042 (4)*
H51.036 (3)0.1449 (8)−0.165 (2)0.036 (4)*
H60.368 (3)0.0433 (8)−0.397 (3)0.046 (5)*
H70.563 (3)0.0162 (8)−0.212 (2)0.038 (4)*
H80.399 (3)0.0624 (9)−0.162 (3)0.045 (4)*
H90.563 (3)0.0840 (10)−0.297 (3)0.051 (5)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0288 (4)0.0397 (5)0.0258 (4)0.0077 (3)0.0131 (3)0.0051 (3)
O20.0235 (4)0.0393 (5)0.0276 (4)0.0052 (3)0.0119 (3)0.0037 (3)
O30.0232 (4)0.0406 (5)0.0217 (4)0.0055 (3)0.0063 (3)0.0075 (3)
N40.0232 (4)0.0297 (5)0.0214 (4)0.0017 (3)0.0064 (3)0.0013 (3)
C10.0224 (5)0.0229 (5)0.0251 (5)−0.0007 (3)0.0063 (4)−0.0025 (3)
C20.0279 (5)0.0271 (5)0.0399 (6)0.0057 (4)0.0102 (5)−0.0013 (4)
C30.0319 (6)0.0226 (5)0.0475 (7)0.0041 (4)0.0038 (5)0.0056 (5)
C40.0310 (6)0.0273 (5)0.0383 (6)−0.0021 (4)0.0039 (5)0.0117 (4)
C50.0247 (5)0.0291 (5)0.0280 (5)−0.0030 (4)0.0059 (4)0.0060 (4)
C60.0187 (4)0.0217 (4)0.0223 (4)−0.0018 (3)0.0033 (3)0.0000 (3)
C70.0179 (4)0.0271 (5)0.0200 (4)−0.0004 (3)0.0041 (3)0.0004 (3)
O1—C11.3547 (13)C2—C31.3826 (18)
O1—H10.931 (19)C2—H20.985 (17)
O2—C7i1.2487 (13)C3—C41.3915 (19)
O3—C71.2749 (12)C3—H31.00 (2)
N4—H60.925 (18)C4—C51.3878 (16)
N4—H70.902 (17)C4—H40.952 (18)
N4—H80.933 (19)C5—C61.3988 (14)
N4—H90.91 (2)C5—H50.981 (17)
C1—C21.3991 (15)C6—C71.5007 (14)
C1—C61.4065 (14)C7—O2ii1.2487 (13)
C1—O1—H1104.0 (11)C2—C3—H3120.0 (12)
H6—N4—H7118.3 (15)C4—C3—H3119.1 (12)
H6—N4—H8108.8 (16)C5—C4—C3119.32 (11)
H7—N4—H8104.2 (14)C5—C4—H4121.2 (11)
H6—N4—H9106.2 (15)C3—C4—H4119.4 (11)
H7—N4—H9108.3 (17)C4—C5—C6121.22 (11)
H8—N4—H9111.1 (15)C4—C5—H5120.8 (9)
O1—C1—C2117.78 (10)C6—C5—H5118.0 (9)
O1—C1—C6122.07 (9)C5—C6—C1118.63 (9)
C2—C1—C6120.14 (10)C5—C6—C7120.76 (9)
C3—C2—C1119.88 (11)C1—C6—C7120.61 (9)
C3—C2—H2125.3 (9)O2ii—C7—O3123.32 (9)
C1—C2—H2114.8 (9)O2ii—C7—C6120.00 (9)
C2—C3—C4120.81 (10)O3—C7—C6116.68 (9)
O1—C1—C2—C3−179.03 (10)C2—C1—C6—C5−0.29 (15)
C6—C1—C2—C30.11 (17)O1—C1—C6—C7−0.95 (15)
C1—C2—C3—C40.53 (18)C2—C1—C6—C7179.95 (9)
C2—C3—C4—C5−0.99 (18)C5—C6—C7—O2ii−5.84 (15)
C3—C4—C5—C60.81 (17)C1—C6—C7—O2ii173.93 (9)
C4—C5—C6—C1−0.18 (16)C5—C6—C7—O3173.62 (9)
C4—C5—C6—C7179.59 (10)C1—C6—C7—O3−6.62 (14)
O1—C1—C6—C5178.82 (9)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O30.93 (2)1.66 (2)2.523 (1)153 (2)
N4—H6···O3iii0.92 (2)1.87 (2)2.787 (1)169 (2)
N4—H7···O2iv0.90 (2)1.91 (2)2.808 (1)175 (1)
N4—H8···O20.93 (2)1.88 (2)2.776 (1)159 (2)
N4—H9···O1v0.91 (2)2.42 (2)3.068 (1)128 (2)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯O30.93 (2)1.66 (2)2.523 (1)153 (2)
N4—H6⋯O3i0.92 (2)1.87 (2)2.787 (1)169 (2)
N4—H7⋯O2ii0.90 (2)1.91 (2)2.808 (1)175 (1)
N4—H8⋯O20.93 (2)1.88 (2)2.776 (1)159 (2)
N4—H9⋯O1iii0.91 (2)2.42 (2)3.068 (1)128 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Crystal structures of rubidium and cesium anthranilates and salicylates.

Authors:  Frank Wiesbrock; Hubert Schmidbaur
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2003-11-03       Impact factor: 5.165

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.