Literature DB >> 21577386

Cs(2)Bi(PO(4))(WO(4)).

Kateryna V Terebilenko, Igor V Zatovsky, Vyacheslav N Baumer, Nikolay S Slobodyanik.   

Abstract

Dicaesium bis-muth(III) phosphate(V) tungstate(VI), Cs(2)Bi(PO(4))(WO(4)), has been synthesized during complex investigation in a molten pseudo-quaternary Cs(2)O-Bi(2)O(3)-P(2)O(5)-WO(3) system. It is isotypic with K(2)Bi(PO(4))(WO(4)). The three-dimensional framework is built up from [Bi(PO(4))(WO(4))] nets, which are organized by adhesion of [BiPO(4)] layers and [WO(4)] tetra-hedra above and below of those layers. The inter-stitial space is occupied by Cs atoms. Bi, W and P atoms lie on crystallographic twofold axes.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21577386      PMCID: PMC2970136          DOI: 10.1107/S160053680903147X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the isotypic potassium analogue, see: Zatovsky et al. (2006 ▶). For a related structure, see: Terebilenko et al. (2008 ▶). For caesium coordination, see Borel et al. (2000 ▶); Yakubovich et al. (2006 ▶)

Experimental

Crystal data

Cs2Bi(PO4)(WO4) M = 817.61 Orthorhombic, a = 21.3144 (10) Å b = 12.6352 (5) Å c = 7.1412 (3) Å V = 1923.21 (14) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 37.87 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.08 × 0.07 × 0.05 mm

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction XCalibur-3 diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (Blessing, 1995 ▶) T min = 0.061, T max = 0.174 (expected range = 0.053–0.151) 10697 measured reflections 1396 independent reflections 1227 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.156

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.052 wR(F 2) = 0.115 S = 1.21 1396 reflections 61 parameters Δρmax = 2.17 e Å−3 Δρmin = −2.63 e Å−3 Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2006 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis CCD; data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2006 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶) and enCIFer (Allen et al., 2004 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680903147X/br2113sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680903147X/br2113Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
Cs2Bi(PO4)(WO4)F(000) = 2768
Mr = 817.61Dx = 5.648 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, IbcaMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -I 2b 2cCell parameters from 10697 reflections
a = 21.3144 (10) Åθ = 3.2–30.0°
b = 12.6352 (5) ŵ = 37.87 mm1
c = 7.1412 (3) ÅT = 293 K
V = 1923.21 (14) Å3Prism, colourless
Z = 80.08 × 0.07 × 0.05 mm
Oxford Diffraction XCalibur-3 diffractometer1396 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1227 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.156
φ and ω scansθmax = 30.0°, θmin = 3.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (Blessing, 1995)h = −27→29
Tmin = 0.061, Tmax = 0.174k = −17→17
10697 measured reflectionsl = −10→10
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullPrimary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.052Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.115w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0396P)2 + 22.3992P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.21(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1396 reflectionsΔρmax = 2.17 e Å3
61 parametersΔρmin = −2.63 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Bi10.250.58662 (4)00.01381 (17)
Cs10.09029 (3)0.83471 (6)0.21999 (11)0.0233 (2)
W10.09279 (3)0.50.250.01566 (18)
P10.250.8232 (3)00.0081 (6)
O10.2413 (4)0.8984 (6)0.1675 (11)0.0204 (17)
O20.3072 (4)0.7487 (6)0.0220 (11)0.0173 (15)
O30.1403 (4)0.5328 (8)0.0513 (13)0.0258 (18)
O40.0440 (4)0.3925 (8)0.1847 (13)0.031 (2)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Bi10.0116 (3)0.0135 (3)0.0162 (3)0−0.00033 (18)0
Cs10.0166 (4)0.0290 (4)0.0243 (4)0.0014 (3)−0.0003 (2)0.0005 (3)
W10.0107 (3)0.0162 (3)0.0201 (3)000.0007 (2)
P10.0077 (15)0.0086 (13)0.0080 (15)0−0.0014 (10)0
O10.034 (5)0.015 (3)0.012 (4)−0.004 (3)0.002 (3)−0.003 (3)
O20.013 (4)0.017 (3)0.021 (4)−0.001 (3)0.000 (3)0.003 (3)
O30.013 (4)0.036 (5)0.028 (4)−0.007 (4)−0.004 (3)0.006 (4)
O40.020 (5)0.032 (5)0.040 (5)−0.013 (4)0.007 (4)−0.013 (4)
Bi1—O22.388 (8)Cs1—O4viii3.111 (10)
Bi1—O2i2.388 (8)Cs1—O4ix3.140 (9)
Bi1—O1ii2.389 (8)Cs1—O13.338 (9)
Bi1—O1iii2.389 (8)Cs1—O3ix3.339 (9)
Bi1—O3i2.463 (8)W1—O41.774 (9)
Bi1—O32.463 (8)W1—O4viii1.774 (9)
Bi1—O1iv2.669 (8)W1—O3viii1.792 (9)
Bi1—O1v2.669 (8)W1—O31.792 (9)
Cs1—O2i2.990 (8)P1—O11.539 (8)
Cs1—O4vi3.031 (9)P1—O1i1.539 (8)
Cs1—O2ii3.046 (8)P1—O2i1.549 (8)
Cs1—O3vii3.088 (9)P1—O21.549 (8)
?—?—??
Table 1

Selected bond lengths (Å)

Bi1—O22.388 (8)
Bi1—O1i2.389 (8)
Bi1—O3ii2.463 (8)
Bi1—O1iii2.669 (8)
Cs1—O2ii2.990 (8)
Cs1—O4iv3.031 (9)
Cs1—O2i3.046 (8)
Cs1—O3v3.088 (9)
Cs1—O4vi3.111 (10)
Cs1—O4vii3.140 (9)
Cs1—O13.338 (9)
Cs1—O3vii3.339 (9)
W1—O41.774 (9)
W1—O3vi1.792 (9)
P1—O11.539 (8)
P1—O1ii1.539 (8)
P1—O2ii1.549 (8)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) ; (vi) ; (vii) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  An empirical correction for absorption anisotropy.

Authors:  R H Blessing
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  K(2)Ho(PO(4))(WO(4)).

Authors:  Katherina V Terebilenko; Igor V Zatovsky; Vyacheslav N Baumer; Nikolay S Slobodyanik; Oleg V Shishkin
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-10-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.