| Literature DB >> 21577286 |
Zdenka Gáspárová1, Vladimír Snirc, Svorad Stolc.
Abstract
Previously, the pyridoindole SMe1EC2 was proved to inhibit lipoperoxidation and carbonylation of proteins in rat brain cortex in the system Fe(2+)/ascorbate and improvement of resistance of the rat hippocampus was reported against ischemic conditions in vitro (hypoxia/hypoglycemia) expressed by the enhanced neuronal response recovery in reoxygenation. The hippocampus fulfils many of the criteria for a neuronal correlate of learning and memory. Recently, an impairment of hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) was reported under oxidative stress. Different therapies, including antioxidants, have been studied intensively concerning the impairment of neuronal plasticity. In this study marked reduction of LTP, elicited by a single burst (100 Hz, 1s) in the CA3-CA1 area of rat hippocampal slices, was shown due to transient hypoxia/hypoglycemia compared to control slices. On the basis of previously reported antioxidant and neuroprotective effects of SMe1EC2, its effect on loss of LTP in the hippocampus due to ischemic conditions was studied in vitro. The pyridoindole tested improved hypoxia/hypoglycemia-induced reduction of LTP compared to untreated hypoxic slices. An opposite effect of SMe1EC2 on LTP induction was found in control slices. The mechanism of SMe1EC2 action on LTP in ischemic conditions has been suggested to differ from the mechanism of its effect in "normoxia" and may be due to different redox status in control and ischemic brain tissue. The manifested LTP-protective effect of SMe1EC2 observed in the rat hippocampus exposed to ischemia in vitro may find exploitation in therapy associated with injured neuronal plasticity in some conditions, including ischemia, trauma and aging in man.Entities:
Keywords: hippocampus; long-term potentiation; oxidative stress; pyridoindole; rat
Year: 2011 PMID: 21577286 PMCID: PMC3090056 DOI: 10.2478/v10102-011-0011-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Interdiscip Toxicol ISSN: 1337-6853
Comparison of SMe1EC2 and stobadine.
| Action | SMe1EC2 | Stobadine |
|---|---|---|
| pIC50=5.487±0.014 | pIC50=4.469±0.023 | |
| 2.284 | 1 (equivalent activity) | |
| no effect | pA2=7.26±0.12 | |
| LD50>2400 mg/kg, | LD50=323.68 mg/kg, | |
| LD50=1963.36 mg/kg, | LD50=164.44 mg/kg, | |
| LD50=181.13 mg/kg, | LD50=63.13 mg/kg, |
Neuroprotective and antioxidant action of SMe1EC2.
| Model of injury | Effect of SMe1EC2 | Animal/Tissue |
|---|---|---|
| Inhibitory effect on lipoperoxidation | rat/brain homogenate | |
| Inhibitory effect on oxidation of creatine phosphokinase | rat/brain homogenate | |
| Inhibitory effect on formation of protein carbonyl groups | rat/brain cortex homogenate | |
| Improvement of sensomotoric stage | mouse | |
| Reduction in brain edema | mouse/brain | |
| Reduction of bleeding into brain | mouse/brain | |
| Prevention of injury-induced decrease in total glutathione level | mouse/brain homogenate | |
| Elimination of injury-induced increase in total lactate level | mouse/brain homogenates | |
| Improved recovery of neuronal response in reoxygenation | rat/hippocampal slices | |
| Reduction of edema | rat/hippocampal slices |
Figure 1LTP induced by a single burst (100 Hz, 1s) in CA3-CA1 pathway of control rat hippocampal slices (n=13) compared to the same response in slices (n=10) exposed to 3.5-min hypoxia/hypoglycemia and after 20 min to high-frequency stimulation. Arrow shows the application of HFS. Values express mean±SEM.
Figure 2LTP induced by a single burst (100 Hz, 1s) in CA3-CA1 pathway of slices (n=10) exposed to 3.5-min hypoxia/hypoglycemia and after 20 min to high-frequency stimulation compared with LTP in hypoxic slices treated 30 min before hypoxia/hypoglycemia and during whole experiment by the pyridoindole SMe1EC2 (1×10−7; 1×10−6; 3×10−6 mol/l; n=9; n=8; n=8, respectively). Arrow shows the application of HFS. Values represent mean±SEM.
Figure 3Normalized fEPSP amplitude measured in 50–60 min after HFS in control slices (C), control slices treated with SMe1EC2, hypoxic untreated slices (H) and hypoxic slices treated with SMe1EC1 in concentration of 1×10−7; 1×10−6 and 3×10−6 mol/l. Significant difference between fEPSP amplitude in control slices compared to hypoxic slices (###p=0.0001), between controls and control slices treated with SMe1EC2 (3×10−6 mol/l) (**p=0.0187), and between hypoxic slices compared to hypoxic slices treated with SMe1EC2 (3×10−6 mol/l) (++ p=0.0058). Significant difference was calculated by Student t-test.