Yuji Oba1, Tareq Abu-Salah. 1. University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo. 65212, USA. obay@health.missouri.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic pleural effusion (EPE) is defined by an eosinophil count of ≥10% in the pleural fluid and often caused by air or blood in the pleural space. The diagnostic significance of EPEs is still a matter of debate. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to systematically review the medical literature to evaluate the diagnostic significance of EPEs. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched from 1950 to April 2010 to perform a meta-analysis. Data were extracted using standardized forms, and pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. A logistic regression analysis was also performed to evaluate the association between the pleural eosinophil counts and the likelihood of underlying causes of EPEs. RESULTS: We identified a total of 687 cases of EPE. The most common cause of EPEs was malignancy (26%) followed by idiopathic (25%) and parapneumonic (13%) effusions. The likelihood of malignancy or tuberculosis was somehow lower in EPEs than in non-EPEs, but the differences were not statistically significant. The prevalence of malignancy was significantly lower in the group of patients that required a pathologic confirmation (21 vs. 30%; p = 0.01). The likelihood of malignancy was inversely correlated with the pleural fluid eosinophil counts. The likelihood of idiopathic effusion was significantly higher in EPEs than in non-EPEs. CONCLUSIONS: Malignancy was the most common cause of EPEs. EPEs appeared to be a negative predictor of malignancy when a pleural fluid eosinophil count was extremely high. EPEs were more likely to be idiopathic as compared with non-EPEs.
BACKGROUND:Eosinophilic pleural effusion (EPE) is defined by an eosinophil count of ≥10% in the pleural fluid and often caused by air or blood in the pleural space. The diagnostic significance of EPEs is still a matter of debate. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to systematically review the medical literature to evaluate the diagnostic significance of EPEs. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched from 1950 to April 2010 to perform a meta-analysis. Data were extracted using standardized forms, and pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. A logistic regression analysis was also performed to evaluate the association between the pleural eosinophil counts and the likelihood of underlying causes of EPEs. RESULTS: We identified a total of 687 cases of EPE. The most common cause of EPEs was malignancy (26%) followed by idiopathic (25%) and parapneumonic (13%) effusions. The likelihood of malignancy or tuberculosis was somehow lower in EPEs than in non-EPEs, but the differences were not statistically significant. The prevalence of malignancy was significantly lower in the group of patients that required a pathologic confirmation (21 vs. 30%; p = 0.01). The likelihood of malignancy was inversely correlated with the pleural fluid eosinophil counts. The likelihood of idiopathic effusion was significantly higher in EPEs than in non-EPEs. CONCLUSIONS:Malignancy was the most common cause of EPEs. EPEs appeared to be a negative predictor of malignancy when a pleural fluid eosinophil count was extremely high. EPEs were more likely to be idiopathic as compared with non-EPEs.
Authors: Rachel M Mercer; John P Corcoran; Jose M Porcel; Najib M Rahman; Ioannis Psallidas Journal: Clin Med (Lond) Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 2.659
Authors: Matthew Evison; Jayne Holme; Mohamed Alaloul; Helen Doran; Paul Bishop; Richard Booton; Nauman Chaudhry Journal: Respir Med Case Rep Date: 2014-12-16
Authors: Tao Fan; Yu Zhang; Yan Lv; Jing Chang; Brent A Bauer; Juan Yang; Cheng-Wei Wang Journal: World J Clin Cases Date: 2021-06-26 Impact factor: 1.337
Authors: Katerina M Antoniou; George A Margaritopoulos; Ioannis Giannarakis; Christianna Choulaki; Nikos Fountoulakis; Nikos M Siafakas; Prodromos Sidiropoulos Journal: Case Rep Med Date: 2013-01-17