Literature DB >> 21576759

From gene trees to species trees II: species tree inference by minimizing deep coalescence events.

Louxin Zhang1.   

Abstract

When gene copies are sampled from various species, the resulting gene tree might disagree with the containing species tree. The primary causes of gene tree and species tree discord include incomplete lineage sorting, horizontal gene transfer, and gene duplication and loss. Each of these events yields a different parsimony criterion for inferring the (containing) species tree from gene trees. With incomplete lineage sorting, species tree inference is to find the tree minimizing extra gene lineages that had to coexist along species lineages; with gene duplication, it becomes to find the tree minimizing gene duplications and/or losses. In this paper, we present the following results: 1) The deep coalescence cost is equal to the number of gene losses minus two times the gene duplication cost in the reconciliation of a uniquely leaf labeled gene tree and a species tree. The deep coalescence cost can be computed in linear time for any arbitrary gene tree and species tree. 2) The deep coalescence cost is always not less than the gene duplication cost in the reconciliation of an arbitrary gene tree and a species tree. 3) Species tree inference by minimizing deep coalescence events is NP-hard.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21576759     DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2011.83

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform        ISSN: 1545-5963            Impact factor:   3.710


  11 in total

1.  Are the duplication cost and Robinson-Foulds distance equivalent?

Authors:  Yu Zheng; Louxin Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Consensus properties for the deep coalescence problem and their application for scalable tree search.

Authors:  Harris T Lin; J Gordon Burleigh; Oliver Eulenstein
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Embedding gene trees into phylogenetic networks by conflict resolution algorithms.

Authors:  Marcin Wawerka; Dawid Dąbkowski; Natalia Rutecka; Agnieszka Mykowiecka; Paweł Górecki
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 1.721

Review 4.  Computational approaches to species phylogeny inference and gene tree reconciliation.

Authors:  Luay Nakhleh
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Inferring duplications, losses, transfers and incomplete lineage sorting with nonbinary species trees.

Authors:  Maureen Stolzer; Han Lai; Minli Xu; Deepa Sathaye; Benjamin Vernot; Dannie Durand
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Fast and accurate methods for phylogenomic analyses.

Authors:  Jimmy Yang; Tandy Warnow
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Structural properties of the reconciliation space and their applications in enumerating nearly-optimal reconciliations between a gene tree and a species tree.

Authors:  Taoyang Wu; Louxin Zhang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Most parsimonious reconciliation in the presence of gene duplication, loss, and deep coalescence using labeled coalescent trees.

Authors:  Yi-Chieh Wu; Matthew D Rasmussen; Mukul S Bansal; Manolis Kellis
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Genomic duplication problems for unrooted gene trees.

Authors:  Jarosław Paszek; Paweł Górecki
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Assessing models of speciation under different biogeographic scenarios; an empirical study using multi-locus and RNA-seq analyses.

Authors:  Taylor Edwards; Marc Tollis; PingHsun Hsieh; Ryan N Gutenkunst; Zhen Liu; Kenro Kusumi; Melanie Culver; Robert W Murphy
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.