Literature DB >> 21576744

Flat Refractive Geometry.

T Treibitz, Y Schechner, C Kunz, H Singh.   

Abstract

While the study of geometry has mainly concentrated on single viewpoint (SVP) cameras, there is growing attention to more general non-SVP systems. Here, we study an important class of systems that inherently have a non-SVP: a perspective camera imaging through an interface into a medium. Such systems are ubiquitous: They are common when looking into water-based environments. The paper analyzes the common flat-interface class of systems. It characterizes the locus of the viewpoints (caustic) of this class and proves that the SVP model is invalid in it. This may explain geometrical errors encountered in prior studies. Our physics-based model is parameterized by the distance of the lens from the medium interface, besides the focal length. The physical parameters are calibrated by a simple approach that can be based on a single frame. This directly determines the system geometry. The calibration is then used to compensate for modeled system distortion. Based on this model, geometrical measurements of objects are significantly more accurate than if based on an SVP model. This is demonstrated in real-world experiments. In addition, we examine by simulation the errors expected by using the SVP model. We show that when working at a constant range, the SVP model can be a good approximation.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21576744     DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2011.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell        ISSN: 0098-5589            Impact factor:   6.226


  8 in total

1.  Methods and measurement variance for field estimations of coral colony planar area using underwater photographs and semi-automated image segmentation.

Authors:  Benjamin P Neal; Tsung-Han Lin; Rivah N Winter; Tali Treibitz; Oscar Beijbom; David Kriegman; David I Kline; B Greg Mitchell
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Optical Sensors and Methods for Underwater 3D Reconstruction.

Authors:  Miquel Massot-Campos; Gabriel Oliver-Codina
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Geometric and Optic Characterization of a Hemispherical Dome Port for Underwater Photogrammetry.

Authors:  Fabio Menna; Erica Nocerino; Francesco Fassi; Fabio Remondino
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  The Bubble Box: Towards an Automated Visual Sensor for 3D Analysis and Characterization of Marine Gas Release Sites.

Authors:  Anne Jordt; Claudius Zelenka; Jens Schneider von Deimling; Reinhard Koch; Kevin Köser
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Autonomous Underwater Navigation and Optical Mapping in Unknown Natural Environments.

Authors:  Juan David Hernández; Klemen Istenič; Nuno Gracias; Narcís Palomeras; Ricard Campos; Eduard Vidal; Rafael García; Marc Carreras
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Caribbean massive corals not recovering from repeated thermal stress events during 2005-2013.

Authors:  Benjamin Paul Neal; Adi Khen; Tali Treibitz; Oscar Beijbom; Grace O'Connor; Mary Alice Coffroth; Nancy Knowlton; David Kriegman; B Greg Mitchell; David I Kline
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Refractive Two-View Reconstruction for Underwater 3D Vision.

Authors:  François Chadebecq; Francisco Vasconcelos; René Lacher; Efthymios Maneas; Adrien Desjardins; Sébastien Ourselin; Tom Vercauteren; Danail Stoyanov
Journal:  Int J Comput Vis       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 7.410

8.  A comparative analysis between active and passive techniques for underwater 3D reconstruction of close-range objects.

Authors:  Gianfranco Bianco; Alessandro Gallo; Fabio Bruno; Maurizio Muzzupappa
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.