Literature DB >> 21576650

Impact of angiographic complete revascularization after drug-eluting stent implantation or coronary artery bypass graft surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease.

Young-Hak Kim1, Duk-Woo Park, Jong-Young Lee, Won-Jang Kim, Sung-Cheol Yun, Jung-Min Ahn, Hae Geun Song, Jun-Hyok Oh, Jong Seon Park, Soo-Jin Kang, Seung-Whan Lee, Cheol Whan Lee, Seong-Wook Park, Seung-Jung Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study sought to evaluate the clinical impact of angiographic complete revascularization (CR) after drug-eluting stent implantation or coronary artery bypass graft surgery for multivessel coronary disease. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 1914 consecutive patients with multivessel coronary disease undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation (1400 patients) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (514 patients) were enrolled. Angiographic CR was defined as revascularization in all diseased segments according to the Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery classification. The outcomes of patients undergoing CR were compared with those undergoing incomplete revascularization (IR) after adjustments with the inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting method. Angiographic CR was performed in 917 patients (47.9%) including 573 percutaneous coronary intervention (40.9%) and 344 coronary artery bypass graft (66.9%) patients. CR patients were younger and had more extensive coronary disease than IR patients. Over 5 years, CR patients had comparable incidences of death (8.9% versus 8.9%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.76 to 1.43; P=0.81), the composite of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke (12.1% versus 11.9%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.36; P=0.80), and the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat revascularization (22.4% versus 24.9%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.10; P=0.32) compared with IR patients. However, 368 patients (19.2%) with multivessel IR had a greater tendency toward higher risk of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization (30.3% versus 22.1%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.66; P=0.079) than those without multivessel IR.
CONCLUSIONS: Angiographic CR with drug-eluting stent implantation or coronary artery bypass grafting did not improve long-term clinical outcomes in patients with multivessel disease. This finding supports the strategy of ischemia-guided revascularization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21576650     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.005041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  19 in total

1.  To complete, or not to complete, that is the question of revascularization in percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for multivessel disease.

Authors:  Hisato Takagi; Tomo Ando; Takuya Umemoto
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Incomplete revascularization: what the surgeon needs to know.

Authors:  Dror B Leviner; Gianluca Torregrossa; John D Puskas
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-07

3.  The relationship between revascularization extent and the long-term prognosis of patients with stable angina pectoris and three-vessel disease treated by percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Quan Li; Xianpeng Yu; Jiqiang He; Yuechun Gao; Xiaoling Zhang; Changyan Wu; Yawei Luo; Yuchen Zhang; Xuejun Ren; Shuzheng Lv; Fang Chen
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 4.  Revascularization in multivessel CAD: a functional approach.

Authors:  Joanne Shannon; Antonio Colombo
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Association of Coronary Vessel Characteristics With Outcome in Patients With Percutaneous Coronary Interventions With Incomplete Revascularization.

Authors:  Edward L Hannan; Ye Zhong; Peter B Berger; Alice K Jacobs; Gary Walford; Frederick S K Ling; Ferdinand J Venditti; Spencer B King
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 14.676

6.  Quantification and impact of untreated coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: the residual SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score.

Authors:  Philippe Généreux; Tullio Palmerini; Adriano Caixeta; Gregg Rosner; Philip Green; Ovidiu Dressler; Ke Xu; Helen Parise; Roxana Mehran; Patrick W Serruys; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Impact of completeness of revascularisation on long-term outcomes in patients with multivessel disease undergoing PCI: CR versus IR outcomes in multivessel CAD.

Authors:  Pravin Goel; Ankit Sahu; Manas Layek; Roopali Khanna; Prabhakar Mishra
Journal:  AsiaIntervention       Date:  2021-07

8.  Complete revascularization determined by myocardial perfusion imaging could improve the outcomes of patients with stable coronary artery disease, compared with incomplete revascularization and no revascularization.

Authors:  Jiehui Li; Xiubin Yang; Yueqin Tian; Hongxing Wei; Marcus Hacker; Xiang Li; Xiaoli Zhang
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Incomplete revascularization is associated with greater risk of long-term mortality after stenting in the era of first generation drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Chuntao Wu; Anne-Marie Dyer; Gary Walford; David R Holmes; Spencer B King; Nicholas J Stamato; Samin Sharma; Alice K Jacobs; Ferdinand J Venditti; Edward L Hannan
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Incomplete revascularization in the drug eluting stent era permits meaningful long-term (12-78 months) outcomes in patients ≥ 75 years with acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Jie Chen; Qiao Xue; Jing Bai; Lei Gao; Jin-Wen Tian; Ke Li; Qiang Xu; Yan-Hua Li; Yu Wang
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.