Literature DB >> 21576499

Role of design complexity in technology improvement.

James McNerney1, J Doyne Farmer, Sidney Redner, Jessika E Trancik.   

Abstract

We study a simple model for the evolution of the cost (or more generally the performance) of a technology or production process. The technology can be decomposed into n components, each of which interacts with a cluster of d - 1 other components. Innovation occurs through a series of trial-and-error events, each of which consists of randomly changing the cost of each component in a cluster, and accepting the changes only if the total cost of the cluster is lowered. We show that the relationship between the cost of the whole technology and the number of innovation attempts is asymptotically a power law, matching the functional form often observed for empirical data. The exponent α of the power law depends on the intrinsic difficulty of finding better components, and on what we term the design complexity: the more complex the design, the slower the rate of improvement. Letting d as defined above be the connectivity, in the special case in which the connectivity is constant, the design complexity is simply the connectivity. When the connectivity varies, bottlenecks can arise in which a few components limit progress. In this case the design complexity depends on the details of the design. The number of bottlenecks also determines whether progress is steady, or whether there are periods of stasis punctuated by occasional large changes. Our model connects the engineering properties of a design to historical studies of technology improvement.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21576499      PMCID: PMC3107265          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1017298108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  1 in total

1.  Learning curves in manufacturing.

Authors:  L Argote; D Epple
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

  1 in total
  13 in total

1.  Punctuated equilibrium in the large-scale evolution of programming languages.

Authors:  Sergi Valverde; Ricard V Solé
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Spectral Characterization of Hierarchical Modularity in Product Architectures.

Authors:  Somwrita Sarkar; Andy Dong; James A Henderson; P A Robinson
Journal:  J Mech Des N Y       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.251

Review 3.  Major transitions in information technology.

Authors:  Sergi Valverde
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Evolving complexity: how tinkering shapes cells, software and ecological networks.

Authors:  Ricard Solé; Sergi Valverde
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Testing and improving technology forecasts for better climate policy.

Authors:  Jessika E Trancik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Quantitative determination of technological improvement from patent data.

Authors:  Christopher L Benson; Christopher L Magee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Serendipity and strategy in rapid innovation.

Authors:  T M A Fink; M Reeves; R Palma; R S Farr
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Artifact interactions retard technological improvement: An empirical study.

Authors:  Subarna Basnet; Christopher L Magee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Using structural diversity to measure the complexity of technologies.

Authors:  Tom Broekel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  On Singularities and Black Holes in Combination-Driven Models of Technological Innovation Networks.

Authors:  Ricard Solé; Daniel R Amor; Sergi Valverde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.