Literature DB >> 21576095

Concomitant infraclavicular plus distal median, radial, and ulnar nerve blockade accelerates upper extremity anaesthesia and improves block consistency compared with infraclavicular block alone.

M J Fredrickson1, F S H Ting, S Chinchanwala, M R Boland.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study tested the hypothesis that a combined ultrasound-guided block of the infraclavicular brachial plexus plus distal median, radial, and ulnar nerves would accelerate upper extremity anaesthesia compared with infraclavicular block alone.
METHODS: Elective wrist and hand surgery patients were randomly assigned to receive 42 ml infraclavicular lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine 1/200,000 ('infraclavicular only'; n=30) or 30 ml lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine 1/200,000 followed by a distal median, radial, and ulnar nerve block using 12 ml 50:50 lidocaine 2%+ropivacaine 0.75% ('combined'; n=31). A blinded observer assessed pinprick sensory and motor block in the four distal nerve territories at 10 and 15 min (each nerve/parameter: no block, 3, to complete block, 0).
RESULTS: Total aggregate block score (sensory+motor) was reduced in the combined group at 15 min [mean (95% confidence interval)=6.7 (5.3-8.1) vs. 9.9 (7.9-11.9), mean difference (95% confidence interval)=3.2 (0.81-5.6), P=0.01], and corresponded to an estimated onset effect time benefit of 6 min (∼40% treatment effect). The combined group also demonstrated reduced variance about the mean (sd=3.7 vs. 5.4, P=0.046). Mean (sd) total block score (sensory+motor) was significantly reduced at 15 min in the combined group for each individual nerve [median, radial, ulnar, respectively: 1.4 (1.1) vs. 2.4 (1.5), P=0.005; 1.2 (1.1) vs. 2.0 (1.5), P=0.03; 1.6 (1.3) vs. 2.5 (1.6), P=0.03].
CONCLUSIONS: At an approximately equivalent total local anaesthetic dose, a combined infraclavicular block plus distal median, radial, and ulnar nerve blockade accelerates anaesthesia onset time and improves block consistency compared with an infraclavicular block alone. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: ANZCTR: ACTRN12610000155099. https://www.anzctr.org.au/registry/trial_review.aspx?ID=335162.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21576095     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  4 in total

1.  Can We Perform Distal Nerve Block Instead of Brachial Plexus Nerve Block Under Ultrasound Guidance for Hand Surgery?

Authors:  Ilker Ince; Mehmet Aksoy; Mine Celik
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2016-10

2.  Can we gain an advantage by combining distal median, radial and ulnar nerve blocks with supraclavicular block? A randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Basak Ceyda Meco; Menekse Ozcelik; Derya Gokmen Oztuna; Mehmet Armangil; Cigdem Yildirim Guclu; Sanem Cakar Turhan; Feyhan Okten
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 3.  Ultrasound guided distal peripheral nerve block of the upper limb: A technical review.

Authors:  Herman Sehmbi; Caveh Madjdpour; Ushma Jitendra Shah; Ki Jinn Chin
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

4.  A triple-masked, randomized controlled trial comparing ultrasound-guided brachial plexus and distal peripheral nerve block anesthesia for outpatient hand surgery.

Authors:  Nicholas C K Lam; Matthew Charles; Deana Mercer; Codruta Soneru; Jennifer Dillow; Francisco Jaime; Timothy R Petersen; Edward R Mariano
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2014-04-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.