BACKGROUND: Recently, the use of the truncated area under the curve from 0 to 2 h (AUC(0-2)) of mycophenolic acid (MPA) has been proposed for therapeutic monitoring in liver transplant recipients. The aim of our study was the evaluation of the clinical usefulness of truncated AUC(0-2) in kidney transplant patients. METHODS: Plasma MPA was measured in samples taken before the morning dose of mycophenolate mofetil, and one-half and 2 h post-dose, completing 63 MPA concentration-time profiles from 40 adult kidney transplant recipients. The AUC from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)) was calculated using the validated algorithm of Pawinski et al. The truncated AUC(0-2) was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule, and extrapolated to 0-12 h (trapezoidal extrapolated AUC(0-12)) as previously described. RESULTS: Algorithm calculated and trapezoidal extrapolated AUC(0-12) values showed high correlation (r=0.995) and acceptable dispersion (ma68=0.71 μg·h/mL), median prediction error (6.6%) and median absolute prediction error (12.6%). The truncated AUC(0-2) had acceptable diagnostic efficiency (87%) in the classification of subtherapeutic, therapeutic or supratherapeutic values with respect to AUC(0-12). However, due to the high inter-individual variation of the drug absorption-rate, the dispersion between both pharmacokinetic variables (ma68=6.9 μg·h/mL) was unacceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial dispersion between truncated AUC(0-2) and AUC(0-12) values may be a serious objection for the routine use of MPA AUC(0-2) in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Recently, the use of the truncated area under the curve from 0 to 2 h (AUC(0-2)) of mycophenolic acid (MPA) has been proposed for therapeutic monitoring in liver transplant recipients. The aim of our study was the evaluation of the clinical usefulness of truncated AUC(0-2) in kidney transplant patients. METHODS: Plasma MPA was measured in samples taken before the morning dose of mycophenolate mofetil, and one-half and 2 h post-dose, completing 63 MPA concentration-time profiles from 40 adult kidney transplant recipients. The AUC from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)) was calculated using the validated algorithm of Pawinski et al. The truncated AUC(0-2) was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule, and extrapolated to 0-12 h (trapezoidal extrapolated AUC(0-12)) as previously described. RESULTS: Algorithm calculated and trapezoidal extrapolated AUC(0-12) values showed high correlation (r=0.995) and acceptable dispersion (ma68=0.71 μg·h/mL), median prediction error (6.6%) and median absolute prediction error (12.6%). The truncated AUC(0-2) had acceptable diagnostic efficiency (87%) in the classification of subtherapeutic, therapeutic or supratherapeutic values with respect to AUC(0-12). However, due to the high inter-individual variation of the drug absorption-rate, the dispersion between both pharmacokinetic variables (ma68=6.9 μg·h/mL) was unacceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial dispersion between truncated AUC(0-2) and AUC(0-12) values may be a serious objection for the routine use of MPA AUC(0-2) in clinical practice.