Literature DB >> 21574740

Stopping while going! Response inhibition does not suffer dual-task interference.

Motonori Yamaguchi1, Gordon D Logan, Patrick G Bissett.   

Abstract

Although dual-task interference is ubiquitous in a variety of task domains, stop-signal studies suggest that response inhibition is not subject to such interference. Nevertheless, no study has directly examined stop-signal performance in a dual-task setting. In two experiments, stop-signal performance was examined in a psychological refractory period task, in which subjects inhibited one response while still executing the other. The results showed little evidence for the refractory effect in stop-signal reaction time, and stop-signal reaction time was similar in dual-task and single-task conditions, despite the fact that overt reaction times were significantly affected by dual-task interference. Therefore, the present study supports the claim that response inhibition does not suffer dual-task interference.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21574740     DOI: 10.1037/a0023918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

1.  Inhibition-induced forgetting: when more control leads to less memory.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-11-14

2.  Living on the edge: strategic and instructed slowing in the stop signal task.

Authors:  Francesco Sella; Mario Bonato; Simone Cutini; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-02-14

Review 3.  The point of no return: A fundamental limit on the ability to control thought and action.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  Selective stopping? Maybe not.

Authors:  Patrick G Bissett; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-03-11

5.  Chronic exercise keeps working memory and inhibitory capacities fit.

Authors:  Concepción Padilla; Laura Pérez; Pilar Andrés
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  Stopping eyes and hands: evidence for non-independence of stop and go processes and for a separation of central and peripheral inhibition.

Authors:  Alessandro Gulberti; Petra A Arndt; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Selection and stopping in voluntary action: a meta-analysis and combined fMRI study.

Authors:  Charlotte L Rae; Laura E Hughes; Chelan Weaver; Michael C Anderson; James B Rowe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Evidence for capacity sharing when stopping.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-05-28

9.  Effects of reward and punishment on the interaction between going and stopping in a selective stop-change task.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Rosamund McLaren
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-11-25

10.  Conscientiousness increases efficiency of multicomponent behavior.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Stock; Christian Beste
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.