OBJECTIVES: Nearly all smokers who lapse experience a full-blown relapse, but the mediating mechanisms that contribute to this relationship are not well understood. A better understanding of these mechanisms would help to advance more effective relapse prevention treatments for smokers. The purpose of this study is to experimentally evaluate the effects of a programmed smoking lapse on smoking relapse and the effects of postlapse changes in craving on relapse. METHOD:Adult smokers (n = 63) who quit smoking with a brief cognitive-behavioral intervention and self-help materials were randomly assigned to one of two experimental conditions after 48 h of abstinence: No lapse (a no-smoking control/30-min waiting period) or lapse (smoking two cigarettes of their favored brand during a 30-min period). All participants were then followed daily for 14 days. Craving and biochemically verified self-reported abstinence were assessed on each follow-up day. Time (days) to relapse (7 consecutive days of smoking) was the main dependent measure. RESULTS: Results of Cox regression analysis revealed that participants in the lapse condition relapsed more quickly than participants in the no-lapse condition (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.03, 4.35]). These effects were attributable, in part, to episodic increases in craving among participants in the lapse condition only (HR = 12.42, 95% CI = [2.00, 77.1]). CONCLUSIONS: Previously abstinent smokers who lapse are at risk for increased cigarette cravings and consequently, full-blown relapse. These results have implications for both cognitive-behavioral treatments for relapse prevention and for medications designed to help smokers manage cravings.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Nearly all smokers who lapse experience a full-blown relapse, but the mediating mechanisms that contribute to this relationship are not well understood. A better understanding of these mechanisms would help to advance more effective relapse prevention treatments for smokers. The purpose of this study is to experimentally evaluate the effects of a programmed smoking lapse on smoking relapse and the effects of postlapse changes in craving on relapse. METHOD: Adult smokers (n = 63) who quit smoking with a brief cognitive-behavioral intervention and self-help materials were randomly assigned to one of two experimental conditions after 48 h of abstinence: No lapse (a no-smoking control/30-min waiting period) or lapse (smoking two cigarettes of their favored brand during a 30-min period). All participants were then followed daily for 14 days. Craving and biochemically verified self-reported abstinence were assessed on each follow-up day. Time (days) to relapse (7 consecutive days of smoking) was the main dependent measure. RESULTS: Results of Cox regression analysis revealed that participants in the lapse condition relapsed more quickly than participants in the no-lapse condition (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.03, 4.35]). These effects were attributable, in part, to episodic increases in craving among participants in the lapse condition only (HR = 12.42, 95% CI = [2.00, 77.1]). CONCLUSIONS: Previously abstinent smokers who lapse are at risk for increased cigarette cravings and consequently, full-blown relapse. These results have implications for both cognitive-behavioral treatments for relapse prevention and for medications designed to help smokers manage cravings.
Authors: Saul Shiffman; William G Shadel; Raymond Niaura; Moise A Khayrallah; Douglas E Jorenby; Charles F Ryan; Clifford L Ferguson Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2003-02-25 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: John R Hughes; Josue P Keely; Ray S Niaura; Deborah J Ossip-Klein; Robyn L Richmond; Gary E Swan Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Marina Unrod; David J Drobes; Paul R Stasiewicz; Joseph W Ditre; Bryan Heckman; Ralph R Miller; Steven K Sutton; Thomas H Brandon Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2013-09-28 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Olaya García-Rodríguez; Carlos Blanco; Melanie M Wall; Shuai Wang; Chelsea J Jin; Kenneth S Kendler Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Clint D Kilts; Ashley Kennedy; Amanda L Elton; Shanti Prakash Tripathi; Jonathan Young; Josh M Cisler; G Andrew James Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2013-11-07 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Brian Hitsman; Lee Hogarth; Li-Jung Tseng; Jordan C Teige; William G Shadel; Dana Britt DiBenedetti; Spencer Danto; Theodore C Lee; Lawrence H Price; Raymond Niaura Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2012-11-30 Impact factor: 4.492