| Literature DB >> 21572673 |
Gaurav A Garg1, Prajct P Sao, Uday S Khopkar.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Keloid is a difficult-to-treat condition and an ideal treatment modality is not available. Carbon dioxide (CO(2)) laser is one of the modalities to treat keloids. AIM: To evaluate the effect of CO(2) laser ablation followed by intralesional steroids on keloids. SETTINGS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Carbon dioxide laser; intralesional steroid; keloid
Year: 2011 PMID: 21572673 PMCID: PMC3081479 DOI: 10.4103/0974-2077.79176
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cutan Aesthet Surg ISSN: 0974-2077
Figure 1Multiple puncture technique. Small full thickness punctures were created throughout the keloid tissue with a gap of 1-2 mm between the two punctures
Figure 2Excision from base of keloid tissue
Figure 3aKeloid over ankle prior to treatment
Figure 3bPost-treatment after 1 year of surgery
Figure 4aKeloid over chest prior to treatment
Figure 4bPost-treatment after 1 year of surgery
Figure 5Graph showing average dose of intralesional steroid (ILS) on follow-up visits
Follow-up log of patients at 6 months and 1 year after procedure
| Id no | age (years) | Sex | Size (cm3) | after 6 months of procedure | after 1 year of procedure | Remark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recurrence | Local S/E | Systemic S/E | Recurrence | Local S/E | Systemic S/E | |||||
| 1 | 22 | M | 2×1×0.5 | 1 | T | No | 1 | T | No | Regular F/U |
| 2 | 20 | M | 4×2×0.5 | 1 | No | No | 6 | No | No | Irregular F/U |
| 3 | 20 | M | 2.5×2×0.5 | 1 | No | No | 6 | No | No | Irregular F/U |
| 4 | 20 | M | 2×2×0.5 | 1 | No | No | 6 | No | No | Irregular F/U |
| 5 | 35 | F | 5×3×1.0 | 0 | No | No | 0 | No | No | Regular F/U |
| 6 | 32 | M | 4×3×0.5 | 0 | T | No | 0 | T | No | Regular F/U |
| 7 | 32 | M | 2×0.5×0.5 | 0 | No | No | 0 | No | No | Regular F/U |
| 8 | 50 | M | 10×3×0.5 | 0 | No | No | 0 | No | No | Regular F/U |
| 9 | 16 | F | 4×2×0.5 | 0 | A/T | No | 0 | A/T | No | Regular F/U |
| 10 | 60 | F | 8×3×0.5 | 0 | No | No | 0 | No | No | Regular F/U |
| 11 | 40 | M | 6×4×1.0 | 3 | No | No | 4 | No | No | Regular F/U |
| 12 | 25 | F | 3×2×0.5 | 0 | D | No | 0 | D | No | Regular F/U |
| 13 | 42 | M | 6×4×0.5 | 0 | T | No | 0 | T | No | Regular F/U |
| 14 | 60 | M | 10×2×1.5 | 6 | No | No | 6 | No | No | Irregular F/U |
| 15 | 28 | F | 8×4×0.5 | 0 | No | No | 0 | No | No | Regular F/U |
| 16 | 42 | M | 5×3×1.5 | 2 | No | No | 2 | No | No | Irregular F/U |
| 17 | 38 | M | 4×3×1.5 | 3 | No | No | 4 | No | No | Irregular F/U |
| 18 | 40 | M | 4×4×1.5 | 3 | No | No | 3 | No | No | Irregular F/U |
| 19 | 30 | M | 5×4×0.5 | 1 | No | No | 1 | No | No | Irregular F/U |
| 20 | 28 | M | 3×3×0.5 | 0 | No | No | 0 | No | No | Irregular F/U |
| 23 | 35 | M | 3×2×1.5 | 0 | No | No | 0 | No | No | Irregular F/U |
| 26 | 26 | F | 4×1×0.5 | 0 | A | No | 0 | A | No | Regular F/U |
| 27 | 26 | F | 4×1×0.5 | 0 | A | No | 0 | A | No | Regular F/U |
| 28 | 30 | F | 3×0.5×0.5 | 0 | No | No | 0 | No | No | Irregular F/U |
| 29 | 25 | F | 3×1×0.5 | 0 | A | No | 0 | A | No | Regular F/U |
| 30 | 18 | M | 8×6×3 | 3 | No | No | 6 | No | No | Irregular F/U |
| 33 | 30 | M | 3×3×0.5 | 0 | A/T | No | 0 | A/T | No | Regular F/U |
| 34 | 50 | M | 6×2×1 | 0 | No | No | 0 | No | No | Regular F/U |
| 35 | 50 | M | 4×2×1 | 0 | No | No | 0 | No | No | Regular F/U |
Recurrence of keloid from initial size 1-10%=1, 11-30%=2, 31-50%=3, 51-70%=4, 71-90%=5, 91-100%=6, A=atrophy, T=telangiectasia, D=depigmentation, regular F/U=patients taken 3-4 weekly intralesional steroids for 6 months, irregular F/U=patients not taken 3-4 weekly intralesional steroids
| Follow-up at 1 year | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Regular patients | Irregular patients | ||
| Recurrence of | Present | 2 | 9 |
| keloid tissue | Absent | 2 | 9 |