Literature DB >> 21572324

The interobserver agreement of handheld dynamometry for muscle strength assessment in critically ill patients.

Goele Vanpee1, Johan Segers, Helena Van Mechelen, Pieter Wouters, Greet Van den Berghe, Greet Hermans, Rik Gosselink.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Muscle weakness often complicates critical illness and is associated with increased risk of morbidity, mortality, and limiting functional outcome even years later. To assess the presence of muscle weakness and to examine the effects of interventions, objective and reliable muscle strength measurements are required. The first objective of this study is to determine interobserver reliability of handheld dynamometry. Secondary objectives are to quantify muscle weakness, to evaluate distribution of muscle weakness, and to evaluate gender-related differences in muscle strength.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study.
SETTING: The surgical and medical intensive care units of a large, tertiary referral, university hospital. PATIENTS: A cross-sectional, randomly selected sample of awake and cooperative critically ill patients.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Handheld dynamometry was performed in critically ill patients who had at least a score of 3 (movement against gravity) on the Medical Research Council scale. Three upper limb and three lower limb muscle groups were tested at the right-hand side. Patients were tested twice daily by two independent raters. Fifty-one test-retests were performed in 39 critically ill patients. Handheld dynamometry demonstrated good interobserver agreement with intraclass correlation coefficients >0.90 in four of the muscle groups tested (range, 0.91-0.96) and somewhat less for hip flexion (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.80) and ankle dorsiflexion (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.76). Limb muscle strength was considerably reduced in all muscle groups as shown by the median z-score (range, -1.08 to -3.48 sd units). Elbow flexors, knee extensors, and ankle dorsiflexors were the most affected muscle groups. Loss of muscle strength was comparable between men and women.
CONCLUSIONS: Handheld dynamometry is a tool with a very good interobserver reliability to assess limb muscle strength in awake and cooperative critically ill patients. Future studies should focus on the sensitivity of handheld dynamometry in longitudinal studies to evaluate predictive values toward patients' functional outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21572324     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821f050b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  24 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of impairment and activity limitations in the critically ill: a systematic review of measurement instruments and their clinimetric properties.

Authors:  Selina M Parry; Catherine L Granger; Sue Berney; Jennifer Jones; Lisa Beach; Doa El-Ansary; René Koopman; Linda Denehy
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Peripheral muscle strength and correlates of muscle weakness in patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Linda L Chlan; Mary Fran Tracy; Jill Guttormson; Kay Savik
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in mechanically ventilated patients: a randomized, sham-controlled pilot trial with blinded outcome assessment.

Authors:  Michelle E Kho; Alexander D Truong; Jennifer M Zanni; Nancy D Ciesla; Roy G Brower; Jeffrey B Palmer; Dale M Needham
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 3.425

4.  The validity of plantarflexor strength measures obtained through hand-held dynamometry measurements of force.

Authors:  Adam R Marmon; Federico Pozzi; Ali H Alnahdi; Joseph A Zeni
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-12

5.  Physical complications in acute lung injury survivors: a two-year longitudinal prospective study.

Authors:  Eddy Fan; David W Dowdy; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Pedro A Mendez-Tellez; Jonathan E Sevransky; Carl Shanholtz; Cheryl R Dennison Himmelfarb; Sanjay V Desai; Nancy Ciesla; Margaret S Herridge; Peter J Pronovost; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 6.  Exercise rehabilitation following hospital discharge in survivors of critical illness: an integrative review.

Authors:  Bronwen Connolly; Linda Denehy; Stephen Brett; Doug Elliott; Nicholas Hart
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Improving physical function of patients following intensive care unit admission (EMPRESS): protocol of a randomised controlled feasibility trial.

Authors:  Rebecca Cusack; Andrew Bates; Kay Mitchell; Zoe van Willigen; Linda Denehy; Nicholas Hart; Ahilanandan Dushianthan; Isabel Reading; Maria Chorozoglou; Gordon Sturmey; Iain Davey; Michael Grocott
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Early rehabilitation using a passive cycle ergometer on muscle morphology in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients in the Intensive Care Unit (MoVe-ICU study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Laura Jurema dos Santos; Fernando de Aguiar Lemos; Tanara Bianchi; Amanda Sachetti; Ana Maria Dall' Acqua; Wagner da Silva Naue; Alexandre Simões Dias; Silvia Regina Rios Vieira
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Early rehabilitation in critical care (eRiCC): functional electrical stimulation with cycling protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Selina M Parry; Sue Berney; René Koopman; Adam Bryant; Doa El-Ansary; Zudin Puthucheary; Nicholas Hart; Stephen Warrillow; Linda Denehy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Clinical review: intensive care unit acquired weakness.

Authors:  Greet Hermans; Greet Van den Berghe
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.