Literature DB >> 21572076

Effect of aspiration of perilymph during stapes surgery on the endocochlear potential of guinea pig.

Ryoukichi Ikeda1, Kazuhiro Nakaya, Hidetoshi Oshima, Takeshi Oshima, Tetsuaki Kawase, Toshimitsu Kobayashi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Suction applied to the vestibule through the oval window during stapes surgery is considered a primary risk for postoperative sensorineural hearing impairment. This study investigated the mechanism of acute phase change in cochlear function caused by aspiration of the opened oval window. STUDY
DESIGN: Guinea pig model.
SETTING: Academic hospital laboratory. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Guinea pigs were divided into 3 groups: stapes footplate removed without suctioning (6 animals), with indirect suctioning (5 animals), and with direct suctioning of the vestibular perilymph (6 animals). Endocochlear potentials (EPs) were measured at the second turn of the cochlea, and temporal bones were examined histologically.
RESULTS: Removal of the stapes footplate without suctioning caused little change in the EP (original value, 80.12 ± 3.52 mV), indirect suctioning caused minor decline of the EP of 9.14 ± 1.84 mV, and partial recovery ensued, whereas direct but gentle suctioning, resulting in dry vestibule, caused reduction in the EP of 16.38 ± 6.63 mV. Recovery was not observed or incomplete. No animals showed profound decrease in the EP.
CONCLUSION: Gentle suctioning and removal of the vestibular perilymph can cause a mild decrease in the EP even without damaging the inner ear structures. Therefore, suctioning of the perilymph should be avoided during stapes surgery because acute hearing loss can result even without damaging the inner ear structures. However, hearing loss may not be profound, if suctioning is not vigorous enough to cause damage to the inner ear structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21572076     DOI: 10.1177/0194599811409516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  5 in total

1.  Hearing outcomes after surgical plugging of the superior semicircular canal by a middle cranial fossa approach.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Yuri Agrawal; Elena Nguyen; Charles C Della Santina; Charles J Limb; Howard W Francis; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Endoscopic diving technique for hearing preservation in managing labyrinth-invading cholesteatomas.

Authors:  Selcuk Mulazimoglu; Cem Meco
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.236

Review 3.  Current Concepts and Future Trends in Increasing the Benefits of Cochlear Implantation: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Cristina Maria Blebea; Laszlo Peter Ujvary; Violeta Necula; Maximilian George Dindelegan; Maria Perde-Schrepler; Mirela Cristina Stamate; Marcel Cosgarea; Alma Aurelia Maniu
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 2.948

4.  Immunoglobulin genomics in the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus).

Authors:  Yongchen Guo; Yonghua Bao; Qingwen Meng; Xiaoxiang Hu; Qingyong Meng; Liming Ren; Ning Li; Yaofeng Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Vestibular Implant: Hearing Preservation during Intralabyrinthine Electrode Insertion-A Case Report.

Authors:  Raymond van de Berg; Florence Lucieer; Nils Guinand; Joost van Tongeren; Erwin George; Jean-Philippe Guyot; Herman Kingma; Marc van Hoof; Yasin Temel; Jacobus van Overbeeke; Angelica Perez-Fornos; Robert Stokroos
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 4.003

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.