Literature DB >> 21572020

Mechanical control of cation channels in the myogenic response.

Brian E Carlson1, Daniel A Beard.   

Abstract

Microcirculatory vessel response to changes in pressure, known as the myogenic response, is a key component of a tissue's ability to regulate blood flow. Experimental studies have not clearly elucidated the mechanical signal in the vessel wall governing steady-state reduction in vessel diameter upon an increase in intraluminal pressure. In this study, a multiscale computational model is constructed from established models of vessel wall mechanics, vascular smooth muscle (VSM) force generation, and VSM Ca(2+) handling and electrophysiology to compare the plausibility of vessel wall stress or strain as an effective mechanical signal controlling steady-state vascular contraction in the myogenic response. It is shown that, at the scale of a resistance vessel, wall stress, and not stretch (strain), is the likely physiological signal controlling the steady-state myogenic response. The model is then used to test nine candidate VSM stress-controlled channel variants by fitting two separate sets of steady-state myogenic response data. The channel variants include nonselective cation (NSC), supplementary Ca(2+) and Na(+), L-type Ca(2+), and large conductance Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channels. The nine variants are tested in turn, and model fits suggest that stress control of Ca(2+) or Na(+) influx through NSC, supplementary Ca(2+) or Na(+), or L-type Ca(2+) channels is sufficient to produce observed steady-state diameter changes with pressure. However, simulations of steady-state VSM membrane potential, cytosolic Ca(2+), and Na(+) with pressure show only that Na(+) influx through NSC channel also generates known trends with increasing pressure, indicating that stress-controlled Na(+) influx through NSC is sufficient to generate the myogenic response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21572020      PMCID: PMC3154678          DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00131.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  56 in total

1.  The myogenic response in isolated rat cerebrovascular arteries: vessel model.

Authors:  Jin Yang; John W Clark; Robert M Bryan; Claudia S Robertson
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  Assessment of endothelial function of large, medium, and small vessels: a unified myograph.

Authors:  Xiao Lu; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  A mathematical model of the myogenic response to systolic pressure in the afferent arteriole.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Ioannis Sgouralis; Leon C Moore; Harold E Layton; Anita T Layton
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2010-12-29

4.  A theoretical model for the myogenic response based on the length-tension characteristics of vascular smooth muscle.

Authors:  Brian E Carlson; Timothy W Secomb
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Coronary arteriolar myogenic response is independent of endothelium.

Authors:  L Kuo; W M Chilian; M J Davis
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 6.  Mechanical transduction by ion channels: how forces reach the channel.

Authors:  F Sachs
Journal:  Soc Gen Physiol Ser       Date:  1997

7.  Spontaneously hypertensive rat resistance artery structure related to myogenic and mechanical properties.

Authors:  S J Bund
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.124

8.  A mathematical model of Ca2+ dynamics in rat mesenteric smooth muscle cell: agonist and NO stimulation.

Authors:  Adam Kapela; Anastasios Bezerianos; Nikolaos M Tsoukias
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Mechanosensitive nonselective cation channel facilitation by endothelin-1 is regulated by protein kinase C in arterial myocytes.

Authors:  Hyang Ae Lee; Eun Bok Baek; Kyung Sun Park; Hoi Jong Jung; Jae Il Kim; Sung Joon Kim; Yung E Earm
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 10.787

10.  Modulation of calcium current in arteriolar smooth muscle by alphav beta3 and alpha5 beta1 integrin ligands.

Authors:  X Wu; J E Mogford; S H Platts; G E Davis; G A Meininger; M J Davis
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1998-10-05       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of Coronary Blood Flow.

Authors:  Adam G Goodwill; Gregory M Dick; Alexander M Kiel; Johnathan D Tune
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 9.090

Review 2.  The role of stretch-activated ion channels in acute respiratory distress syndrome: finally a new target?

Authors:  Andreas Schwingshackl
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 5.464

3.  Predicted effects of nitric oxide and superoxide on the vasoactivity of the afferent arteriole.

Authors:  Anita T Layton; Aurélie Edwards
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2015-07-15

4.  Multiscale modeling and data integration in the virtual physiological rat project.

Authors:  Daniel A Beard; Maxwell L Neal; Nazanin Tabesh-Saleki; Christopher T Thompson; James B Bassingthwaighte; Mary Shimoyama; Brian E Carlson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 5.  ROK and Arteriolar Myogenic Tone Generation: Molecular Evidence in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Ahmed F El-Yazbi; Khaled S Abd-Elrahman
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 6.  Mechanoresponse of stem cells for vascular repair.

Authors:  Ge-Er Tian; Jun-Teng Zhou; Xiao-Jing Liu; Yong-Can Huang
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 7.  Overview of mathematical modeling of myocardial blood flow regulation.

Authors:  Ravi Namani; Yoram Lanir; Lik Chuan Lee; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.733

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.