Literature DB >> 21571871

A method for longitudinal prospective evaluation of markers for a subsequent event.

Roderick J Little1, Matheos Yosef, Bin Nan, Siobán D Harlow.   

Abstract

In this paper, the authors describe a simple method for making longitudinal comparisons of alternative markers of a subsequent event. The method is based on the aggregate prediction gain from knowing whether or not a marker has occurred at any particular age. An attractive feature of the method is the exact decomposition of the measure into 2 components: 1) discriminatory ability, which is the difference in the mean time to the subsequent event for individuals for whom the marker has and has not occurred, and 2) prevalence factor, which is related to the proportion of individuals who are positive for the marker at a particular age. Development of the method was motivated by a study that evaluated proposed markers of the menopausal transition, where the markers are measures based on successive menstrual cycles and the subsequent event is the final menstrual period. Here, results from application of the method to 4 alternative proposed markers of the menopausal transition are compared with previous findings.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21571871      PMCID: PMC3145393          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  23 in total

1.  Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker.

Authors:  P J Heagerty; T Lumley; M S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Executive summary: Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop (STRAW).

Authors:  M R Soules; S Sherman; E Parrott; R Rebar; N Santoro; W Utian; N Woods
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Measures of menopausal status in relation to demographic, reproductive, and behavioral characteristics in a population-based study of women aged 35-49 years.

Authors:  G S Cooper; D D Baird; F R Darden
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Causal inference on the difference of the restricted mean lifetime between two groups.

Authors:  P Y Chen; A A Tsiatis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Menopausal transition: predicting time to menopause for women 44 years or older from simple questions on menstrual variability.

Authors:  Sylvia M Taylor; Ann M Kinney; Jennie K Kline
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Staging reproductive aging: a comparison of proposed bleeding criteria for the menopausal transition.

Authors:  Lynda D Lisabeth; Siobán D Harlow; Brenda Gillespie; Xihong Lin; Mary Fran Sowers
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Three stages of the menopausal transition from the Seattle Midlife Women's Health Study: toward a more precise definition.

Authors:  E S Mitchell; N F Woods; A Mariella
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Bias due to left truncation and left censoring in longitudinal studies of developmental and disease processes.

Authors:  Kevin C Cain; Siobán D Harlow; Roderick J Little; Bin Nan; Matheos Yosef; John R Taffe; Michael R Elliott
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Variation of the human menstrual cycle through reproductive life.

Authors:  A E Treloar; R E Boynton; B G Behn; B W Brown
Journal:  Int J Fertil       Date:  1967 Jan-Mar

10.  Menstrual patterns leading to the final menstrual period.

Authors:  John R Taffe; Lorraine Dennerstein
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.953

View more
  1 in total

1.  Invited commentary: the importance of prevalence in the effectiveness of a (bio)marker.

Authors:  Arpita Ghosh; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 4.897

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.