Literature DB >> 21571757

Differences in sensory processing between chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain patients with and without cervicogenic headache.

Nicholas H L Chua1, Hans A van Suijlekom, Kris C Vissers, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Oliver H Wilder-Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is not known why some patients with underlying chronic nociceptive sources in the neck develop cervicogenic headache (CEH) and why others do not. This quantitative sensory testing (QST) study systematically explores the differences in sensory pain processing in 17 CEH patients with underlying chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain compared to 10 patients with chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain but without CEH.
METHODS: The QST protocol comprises pressure pain threshold testing, thermal detection threshold testing, electrical pain threshold testing and measurement of descending inhibitory modulation using the conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm.
RESULTS: The main difference between patients with or without CEH was the lateralization of pressure hyperalgesia to the painful side of the head of CEH patients, accompanied by cold as well as warm relative hyperesthesia on the painful side of the head and neck. DISCUSSION: From this hypothesis-generating study, our results suggest that rostral neuraxial spread of central sensitization, probably to the trigeminal spinal nucleus, plays a major role in the development of CEH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21571757     DOI: 10.1177/0333102411408358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cephalalgia        ISSN: 0333-1024            Impact factor:   6.292


  10 in total

Review 1.  Changes in pain sensitivity following spinal manipulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rogelio A Coronado; Charles W Gay; Joel E Bialosky; Giselle D Carnaby; Mark D Bishop; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 2.368

2.  Cervico-cephalalgiaphobia: a subtype of phobia in patients with cervicogenic headache and neck pain? A pilot study.

Authors:  Rob A B Oostendorp; Hans Elvers; Emilia Mikolajewska; Nathalie Roussel; Emiel van Trijffel; Han Samwel; Jo Nijs; William Duquet
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-09

3.  Cervicogenic headaches: an evidence-led approach to clinical management.

Authors:  Phil Page
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-09

Review 4.  Outcomes of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for migraine headaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adam G Evans; Abigail N Horrar; Maryo M Ibrahim; Brady L Burns; Christopher L Kalmar; Patrick E Assi; Krista N Brooks-Horrar; Tigran Kesayan; Salam Al Kassis
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 6.682

5.  Increased mechanosensivity of the greater occipital nerve in subjects with side-dominant head and neck pain - a diagnostic case-control study.

Authors:  Tibor M Szikszay; Kerstin Luedtke; Piekartz Harry von
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2018-07-31

6.  Clinical reasoning for manual therapy management of tension type and cervicogenic headache.

Authors:  César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas; Carol A Courtney
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2014-02

7.  Ultrasound-Guided versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Deep Cervical Plexus Block for the Treatment of Cervicogenic Headache.

Authors:  Qing Wan; Haiyun Yang; Xiao Li; Caina Lin; Songjian Ke; Shaoling Wu; Chao Ma
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Understanding cervicogenic headache.

Authors:  Nicholas H L Chua; Hans V Suijlekom; Oliver H Wilder-Smith; Kris C P Vissers
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2012-07-10

Review 9.  Pressure pain thresholds over the cranio-cervical region in headache: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  René F Castien; Johannes C van der Wouden; Willem De Hertogh
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 7.277

10.  Exploring multidimensional characteristics in cervicogenic headache: Relations between pain processing, lifestyle, and psychosocial factors.

Authors:  Sarah Mingels; Wim Dankaerts; Ludo van Etten; Liesbeth Bruckers; Marita Granitzer
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 2.708

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.