BACKGROUND: Patients bridged to heart transplantation with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been reported to have higher post-transplant mortality compared with those without LVADs. Our aim was to determine the impact of the type of LVAD and implant era on post-transplant survival. METHODS: In this study we included 8,557 patients from the registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. We examined post-transplant outcomes in 1,100 patients bridged to transplant with pulsatile-flow LVADs between January 2000 and June 2004 (first era), 880 patients bridged with pulsatile-flow LVADs between July 2004 and May 2008 (second era), and 417 patients bridged with continuous-flow LVADs in the second era. Patients who required intravenous inotropes but not LVAD support (n = 2,728) and patients who did not require either LVAD or inotropes (n = 3,432) served as controls. RESULTS: Post-transplant survival of patients bridged with pulsatile LVADs improved significantly between the first and the second era (p = 0.03). In the second era, there was no significant difference in post-transplant survival of patients bridged with pulsatile- vs continuous-flow LVADs (p = 0.26), and survival rates in the 2 groups were not statistically different from that of the non-LVAD group. Graft rejection was similar in patients bridged with LVADs compared to those without LVADs. CONCLUSIONS: In the most recent era, the use of either pulsatile- or continuous-flow LVADs did not result in increased post-transplant mortality. This finding is important as the proportion of patients with LVADs at the time of transplant has been rising. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND:Patients bridged to heart transplantation with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been reported to have higher post-transplant mortality compared with those without LVADs. Our aim was to determine the impact of the type of LVAD and implant era on post-transplant survival. METHODS: In this study we included 8,557 patients from the registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. We examined post-transplant outcomes in 1,100 patients bridged to transplant with pulsatile-flow LVADs between January 2000 and June 2004 (first era), 880 patients bridged with pulsatile-flow LVADs between July 2004 and May 2008 (second era), and 417 patients bridged with continuous-flow LVADs in the second era. Patients who required intravenous inotropes but not LVAD support (n = 2,728) and patients who did not require either LVAD or inotropes (n = 3,432) served as controls. RESULTS: Post-transplant survival of patients bridged with pulsatile LVADs improved significantly between the first and the second era (p = 0.03). In the second era, there was no significant difference in post-transplant survival of patients bridged with pulsatile- vs continuous-flow LVADs (p = 0.26), and survival rates in the 2 groups were not statistically different from that of the non-LVAD group. Graft rejection was similar in patients bridged with LVADs compared to those without LVADs. CONCLUSIONS: In the most recent era, the use of either pulsatile- or continuous-flow LVADs did not result in increased post-transplant mortality. This finding is important as the proportion of patients with LVADs at the time of transplant has been rising. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: George J Arnaoutakis; Timothy J George; Arman Kilic; Claude A Beaty; Eric S Weiss; John V Conte; Ashish S Shah Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2012-03-17 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Lauren K Truby; Maryjane A Farr; A Reshad Garan; Raymond Givens; Susan W Restaino; Farhana Latif; Hiroo Takayama; Yoshifumi Naka; Koji Takeda; Veli K Topkara Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Omar Wever-Pinzon; Stavros G Drakos; Abdallah G Kfoury; Jose N Nativi; Edward M Gilbert; Melanie Everitt; Rami Alharethi; Kim Brunisholz; Feras M Bader; Dean Y Li; Craig H Selzman; Josef Stehlik Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-12-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Peter Chiu; Justin M Schaffer; Philip E Oyer; Michael Pham; Dipanjan Banerjee; Y Joseph Woo; Richard Ha Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Curtis J Wozniak; Josef Stehlik; Bradley C Baird; Stephen H McKellar; Howard K Song; Stavros G Drakos; Craig H Selzman Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2014-01-11 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Veli K Topkara; James K O'Neill; Adam Carlisle; Eric Novak; Scott C Silvestry; Gregory A Ewald Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2013-10-17 Impact factor: 4.330