Literature DB >> 21570756

Comparison of solid and liquid-phase bioassays using ecoscores to assess contaminated soils.

Christine Lors1, Jean-François Ponge, Maite Martínez Aldaya, Denis Damidot.   

Abstract

Bioassays on aqueous and solid phases of contaminated soils were compared, belonging to a wide array of trophic and response levels and using ecoscores for evaluating ecotoxicological and genotoxicological endpoints. The method was applied to four coke factory soils contaminated mainly with PAHs, but also to a lesser extent by heavy metals and cyanides. Aquatic bioassays do not differ from terrestrial bioassays when scaling soils according to toxicity but they are complementary from the viewpoint of ecological relevance. Both aquatic and terrestrial endpoints are strongly correlated with concentrations of 3-ring PAHs. This evaluation procedure allows us to propose a cost-effective battery which embraces a wide array of test organisms and response levels: it includes two rapid bioassays (Microtox(®) and springtail avoidance), a micronucleus test and three bioassays of a longer duration (algal growth, lettuce germination and springtail reproduction). This battery can be recommended for a cost-effective assessment of polluted/remediated soils.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21570756     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.04.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  6 in total

1.  Environmental hazard assessment by the Ecoscore system to discriminate PAH-polluted soils.

Authors:  Christine Lors; Jean-François Ponge; Denis Damidot
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Rapid in situ assessment for predicting soil quality using an algae-soaked disc seeding assay.

Authors:  Sun-Hwa Nam; Jongmin Moon; Shin Woong Kim; Hakyeong Kim; Seung-Woo Jeong; Youn-Joo An
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Microscopy in addition to chemical analyses and ecotoxicological assays for the environmental hazard assessment of coal tar-polluted soils.

Authors:  Christine Lors; Jean-François Ponge; Denis Damidot
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-11-12       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Sorption ability of the soil and its impact on environmental contamination.

Authors:  Šárka Hřibová; Helena Zlámalová Gargošová; Milada Vávrová
Journal:  Interdiscip Toxicol       Date:  2015-03-04

5.  Software for Matching Standard Activity Enzyme Biosensors for Soil Pollution Analysis.

Authors:  Valentina A Kratasyuk; Elizaveta M Kolosova; Oleg S Sutormin; Viktoriya I Lonshakova-Mukina; Matvey M Baygin; Nadezhda V Rimatskaya; Irina E Sukovataya; Alexander A Shpedt
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter-comparison of sample preparation techniques for the Vibrio fischeri assay.

Authors:  Nora Kováts; Katalin Hubai; Tsend-Ayush Sainnokhoi; András Hoffer; Gábor Teke
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 4.609

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.