Literature DB >> 21570549

Immediate vs. delayed post-abortal copper T 380A IUD insertion in cases over 12 weeks of gestation.

Miriam Cremer1, Kimberley A Bullard, Raegan McDonald Mosley, Christine Weiselberg, Michael Molaei, Veronica Lerner, Todd A Alonzo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The intrauterine device (IUD) is a safe, effective, well-tolerated form of contraception. Immediate placement after second-trimester abortion could increase high-tier contraception use in women who are at high risk for unintended pregnancy. STUDY
DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial compared immediate vs. delayed placement of Copper T380A IUD insertion 2-4 weeks after second trimester abortion. The primary outcome analyzed was the percentage of women using a copper T380A IUD 6 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes were percentage of subjects using other high or middle tier contraception, expulsion, infection and repeat pregnancy rates as well as IUD satisfaction. In expectation of a high loss to follow-up at 6 months, 215 subjects were enrolled for a desired sample size of 158 subjects.
RESULTS: Contraceptive and pregnancy status at 6 months was known for 159 of 215 subjects. Women randomized to immediate insertion were significantly more likely to have an IUD at 6 months compared to delayed (81.7% vs. 28.4%, p=.003). Relative risk was 11.2 (95% CI 5-26). There were 8 (5.1%) of 159 repeat unintended pregnancies. No women had a repeat pregnancy that had an IUD placed in the operating room. In the as-treated analysis, 64 women in the immediate group received the IUD and 0% had a repeat pregnancy. Of the remaining 95 women, 8 (8.4%) had a repeat pregnancy. This is a statistically significant difference (p=.022).
CONCLUSION: Placing the IUD immediately after the procedure significantly increases the likelihood of use of effective contraception following a second-trimester procedure. Women who have an IUD placed immediately after their procedure may also be less likely to have a subsequent unplanned pregnancy.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21570549     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  10 in total

1.  Funding policies and postabortion long-acting reversible contraception: results from a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Corinne H Rocca; Kirsten M J Thompson; Suzan Goodman; Carolyn L Westhoff; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Rationale and enrollment results for a partially randomized patient preference trial to compare continuation rates of short-acting and long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  David Hubacher; Hannah Spector; Charles Monteith; Pai-Lien Chen; Catherine Hart
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 3.  New developments in long-acting reversible contraception: the promise of intrauterine devices and implants to improve family planning services.

Authors:  David K Turok; Lori M Gawron; Samantha Lawson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Multiple Unintended Pregnancies in U.S. Women: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  E Angel Aztlan-James; Monica McLemore; Diana Taylor
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2017-03-09

Review 5.  Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices.

Authors:  Babasola O Okusanya; Olabisi Oduwole; Emmanuel E Effa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-28

6.  Comparing long-acting reversible contraception insertion rates in women with Medicaid vs. private insurance in a clinic with a two-visit protocol.

Authors:  Tara M Higgins; Anne K Dougherty; Gary J Badger; Sarah H Heil
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Contraception after medication abortion in the United States: results from a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Corinne H Rocca; Suzan Goodman; Daniel Grossman; Kara Cadwallader; Kirsten M J Thompson; Elizabeth Talmont; J Joseph Speidel; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Contraceptive Practices, Preferences, and Barriers Among Abortion Clients in North Carolina.

Authors:  Amy G Bryant; Ilene S Speizer; Jennifer C Hodgkinson; Alison Swiatlo; Siân L Curtis; Krista Perreira
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.954

9.  Immediate vs. delayed insertion of intrauterine contraception after second trimester abortion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wendy V Norman; Janusz Kaczorowski; Judith A Soon; Rollin Brant; Stirling Bryan; Konia J Trouton; Lyda Dicus
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  Postabortion Care: 20 Years of Strong Evidence on Emergency Treatment, Family Planning, and Other Programming Components.

Authors:  Douglas Huber; Carolyn Curtis; Laili Irani; Sara Pappa; Lauren Arrington
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2016-09-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.