Literature DB >> 21570523

Do heart failure disease management programs make financial sense under a bundled payment system?

Zubin J Eapen1, Shelby D Reed, Lesley H Curtis, Adrian F Hernandez, Eric D Peterson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Policy makers have proposed bundling payments for all heart failure (HF) care within 30 days of an HF hospitalization in an effort to reduce costs. Disease management (DM) programs can reduce costly HF readmissions but have not been economically attractive for caregivers under existing fee-for-service payment. Whether a bundled payment approach can address the negative financial impact of DM programs is unknown.
METHODS: Our study determined the cost-neutral point for the typical DM program and examined whether published HF DM programs can be cost saving under bundled payment programs. We used a decision analytic model using data from retrospective cohort studies, meta-analyses, 5 randomized trials evaluating DM programs, and inpatient claims for all Medicare beneficiaries discharged with an HF diagnosis from 2001 to 2004. We determined the costs of DM programs and inpatient care over 30 and 180 days.
RESULTS: With a baseline readmission rate of 22.9%, the average cost for readmissions over 30 days was $2,272 per patient. Under base-case assumptions, a DM program that reduced readmissions by 21% would need to cost $477 per patient to be cost neutral. Among evaluated published DM programs, 2 of the 5 would increase provider costs (+$15 to $283 per patient), whereas 3 programs would be cost saving (-$241 to $347 per patient). If bundled payments were broadened to include care over 180 days, then program saving estimates would increase, ranging from $419 to $1,706 per patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Proposed bundled payments for HF admissions provide hospitals with a potential financial incentive to implement DM programs that efficiently reduce readmissions.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21570523     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  4 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary strategies in the diagnosis and management of heart failure.

Authors:  Shannon M Dunlay; Naveen L Pereira; Sudhir S Kushwaha
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Surgical readmission and survival in women with ovarian cancer: Are short-term quality metrics incentivizing decreased long-term survival?

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Emma C Rossi; Paola A Gehrig
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Predicting costs among medicare beneficiaries with heart failure.

Authors:  Melissa A Greiner; Bradley G Hammill; Gregg C Fonarow; David J Whellan; Zubin J Eapen; Adrian F Hernandez; Lesley H Curtis
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Utility of Biomarkers to Improve Prediction of Readmission or Mortality After Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Jeremiah R Brown; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Shama S Alam; Heather Thiessen-Philbrook; Allen Everett; Donald S Likosky; Kevin Lobdell; Moritz C Wyler von Ballmoos; Devin M Parker; Amit X Garg; Todd Mackenzie; Marshall L Jacobs; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 4.330

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.