OBJECTIVE: To examine the current evidence regarding the reliability and validity of hand-held dynamometry for assessment of muscle strength in the clinical setting. DATA SOURCES: A search was conducted of the following databases: Cochrane, MEDLINE, PubMed, PEDro, OTseeker, Index to Chiropractic Literature (ICL), and MANTIS, from inception until January 29, 2010. STUDY SELECTION: The MeSH subject heading "muscle strength dynamometer" was searched, in isolation and in combination with the text word phrases "hand-held dynamometer" and "isokinetic." Four hundred fifty-four different studies met this search and were reviewed for possible inclusion. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers assessed the quality of the included manuscripts. The PEDro data collection system was used in conjunction with the Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Description. A third reviewer was used when there was disagreement between the primary reviewers. DATA SYNTHESIS: Seventeen manuscripts met the inclusion criteria for this review, with a total of 19 studies (2 of the manuscripts involved 2 separate studies) that compared hand-held dynamometry with an identified reference standard (isokinetic muscle strength testing). The results demonstrated minimal differences between hand-held dynamometry and isokinetic testing. CONCLUSIONS: Considering hand-held dynamometry's ease of use, portability, cost, and compact size, compared with isokinetic devices this instrument can be regarded as a reliable and valid instrument for muscle strength assessment in a clinical setting.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the current evidence regarding the reliability and validity of hand-held dynamometry for assessment of muscle strength in the clinical setting. DATA SOURCES: A search was conducted of the following databases: Cochrane, MEDLINE, PubMed, PEDro, OTseeker, Index to Chiropractic Literature (ICL), and MANTIS, from inception until January 29, 2010. STUDY SELECTION: The MeSH subject heading "muscle strength dynamometer" was searched, in isolation and in combination with the text word phrases "hand-held dynamometer" and "isokinetic." Four hundred fifty-four different studies met this search and were reviewed for possible inclusion. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers assessed the quality of the included manuscripts. The PEDro data collection system was used in conjunction with the Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Description. A third reviewer was used when there was disagreement between the primary reviewers. DATA SYNTHESIS: Seventeen manuscripts met the inclusion criteria for this review, with a total of 19 studies (2 of the manuscripts involved 2 separate studies) that compared hand-held dynamometry with an identified reference standard (isokinetic muscle strength testing). The results demonstrated minimal differences between hand-held dynamometry and isokinetic testing. CONCLUSIONS: Considering hand-held dynamometry's ease of use, portability, cost, and compact size, compared with isokinetic devices this instrument can be regarded as a reliable and valid instrument for muscle strength assessment in a clinical setting.
Authors: Sarah Schlaeger; Stephanie Inhuber; Alexander Rohrmeier; Michael Dieckmeyer; Friedemann Freitag; Elisabeth Klupp; Dominik Weidlich; Georg Feuerriegel; Florian Kreuzpointner; Ansgar Schwirtz; Ernst J Rummeny; Claus Zimmer; Jan S Kirschke; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Thomas Baum Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-07-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Fredrik R Johansson; Eva Skillgate; Mattis L Lapauw; Dorien Clijmans; Valentijn P Deneulin; Tanneke Palmans; Human Kinetic Engineer; Ann M Cools Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: E A Vola; M Albano; C Di Luise; V Servodidio; M Sansone; S Russo; B Corrado; C Servodio Iammarrone; M G Caprio; G Vallone Journal: J Ultrasound Date: 2018-07-20