Literature DB >> 2156984

Acyclovir treatment of varicella in otherwise healthy children.

H H Balfour1, J M Kelly, C S Suarez, R C Heussner, J A Englund, D D Crane, P V McGuirt, A F Clemmer, D M Aeppli.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether acyclovir administered orally affects the duration and severity of varicella in otherwise normal children.
DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.
SETTING: Patients' residence and university hospital clinic. PATIENTS: One hundred five children between 5 and 16 years of age with laboratory-confirmed varicella entered the study. Of the 102 who were included in the final analysis, 50 received acyclovir and 52 received placebo. INTERVENTION: Placebo or acyclovir was given orally four times daily, for 5 to 7 days. The acyclovir dose was adjusted as follows: 5 to 7 years of age, 20 mg/kg; 7 to 12 years, 15 mg/kg; and 12 to 16 years, 10 mg/kg.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Acyclovir recipients, compared with the placebo group, defervesced sooner (median, 1 day vs 2 days; p = 0.001), experienced onset of cutaneous healing sooner, as reflected by a decrease in number of lesions (median, 3 days vs 2 days; p = 0.002), and had fewer skin lesions (median, 500 vs 336; p = 0.02). Acyclovir did not significantly change the rate of complications of varicella (10% in the acyclovir group vs 13.5% among placebo subjects). Adverse drug effects were not observed. Acyclovir recipients had lower geometric mean serum antibody titers to varicella-zoster virus than their placebo counterparts 4 weeks after the onset of illness, but antibody titers in both groups were similar 1 year later.
CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence that acyclovir is useful and well tolerated for treatment of varicella in otherwise healthy children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2156984     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81618-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  23 in total

1.  Managing childhood chickenpox: cost implications.

Authors:  P A Brunell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Aciclovir and varicella-zoster-immunoglobulin in solid-organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Martina Prelog; Jörn Schönlaub; Lothar Bernd Zimmerhackl
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 3.  Antiviral therapy: current concepts and practices.

Authors:  B Bean
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Modifying chickenpox.

Authors:  E Pennington; S Pennington
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991 Dec 21-28

5.  Use of a reformulated Oka strain varicella vaccine (SmithKline Beecham Biologicals/Oka) in healthy children.

Authors:  A Y Tan; C J Connett; G J Connett; S C Quek; H K Yap; F Meurice; B W Lee
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Towards universal childhood immunization against chickenpox?

Authors:  B J Law
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.253

7.  Varicella gangrenosum in adult: a fatal chickenpox complication.

Authors:  Ashish Sharma; Samarth Agarwal; Anamika Sharma; Manoj Kumar
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-04-04

Review 8.  Acyclovir for childhood chickenpox. Cost is unjustified.

Authors:  M W McKendrick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-14

9.  Acyclovir for childhood chickenpox. No reason not to treat.

Authors:  H H Balfour
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-14

10.  Three-year follow-up of protection rates in children given varicella vaccine.

Authors:  David W Scheifele; Scott A Halperin; Francisco Diaz-Mitoma
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2002-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.