Literature DB >> 21569779

Does a crouched leg posture enhance running stability and robustness?

Yvonne Blum1, Aleksandra Birn-Jeffery, Monica A Daley, Andre Seyfarth.   

Abstract

Humans and birds both walk and run bipedally on compliant legs. However, differences in leg architecture may result in species-specific leg control strategies as indicated by the observed gait patterns. In this work, control strategies for stable running are derived based on a conceptual model and compared with experimental data on running humans and pheasants (Phasianus colchicus). From a model perspective, running with compliant legs can be represented by the planar spring mass model and stabilized by applying swing leg control. Here, linear adaptations of the three leg parameters, leg angle, leg length and leg stiffness during late swing phase are assumed. Experimentally observed kinematic control parameters (leg rotation and leg length change) of human and avian running are compared, and interpreted within the context of this model, with specific focus on stability and robustness characteristics. The results suggest differences in stability characteristics and applied control strategies of human and avian running, which may relate to differences in leg posture (straight leg posture in humans, and crouched leg posture in birds). It has been suggested that crouched leg postures may improve stability. However, as the system of control strategies is overdetermined, our model findings suggest that a crouched leg posture does not necessarily enhance running stability. The model also predicts different leg stiffness adaptation rates for human and avian running, and suggests that a crouched avian leg posture, which is capable of both leg shortening and lengthening, allows for stable running without adjusting leg stiffness. In contrast, in straight-legged human running, the preparation of the ground contact seems to be more critical, requiring leg stiffness adjustment to remain stable. Finally, analysis of a simple robustness measure, the normalized maximum drop, suggests that the crouched leg posture may provide greater robustness to changes in terrain height.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21569779     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.04.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  11 in total

1.  Two explanations for the compliant running paradox: reduced work of bouncing viscera and increased stability in uneven terrain.

Authors:  Monica A Daley; James R Usherwood
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Human and avian running on uneven ground: a model-based comparison.

Authors:  R Müller; A V Birn-Jeffery; Y Blum
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Constraints on muscle performance provide a novel explanation for the scaling of posture in terrestrial animals.

Authors:  James R Usherwood
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  General and Specific Strategies Used to Facilitate Locomotor Maneuvers.

Authors:  Mengnan Wu; Jesse H Matsubara; Keith E Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Don't break a leg: running birds from quail to ostrich prioritise leg safety and economy on uneven terrain.

Authors:  Aleksandra V Birn-Jeffery; Christian M Hubicki; Yvonne Blum; Daniel Renjewski; Jonathan W Hurst; Monica A Daley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Stability in skipping gaits.

Authors:  Emanuel Andrada; Roy Müller; Reinhard Blickhan
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Posture alteration as a measure to accommodate uneven ground in able-bodied gait.

Authors:  Soran Aminiaghdam; Reinhard Blickhan; Roy Muller; Christian Rode
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Swing-leg trajectory of running guinea fowl suggests task-level priority of force regulation rather than disturbance rejection.

Authors:  Yvonne Blum; Hamid R Vejdani; Aleksandra V Birn-Jeffery; Christian M Hubicki; Jonathan W Hurst; Monica A Daley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Geckos decouple fore- and hind limb kinematics in response to changes in incline.

Authors:  Aleksandra V Birn-Jeffery; Timothy E Higham
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 10.  Understanding the Agility of Running Birds: Sensorimotor and Mechanical Factors in Avian Bipedal Locomotion.

Authors:  Monica A Daley
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.