| Literature DB >> 21569366 |
Elke A F Van Doren1, Pieter-Jan R H De Temmerman, Michel Abi Daoud Francisco, Jan Mast.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) remains an important technique to investigate the size, shape and surface characteristics of particles at the nanometer scale. Resulting micrographs are two dimensional projections of objects and their interpretation can be difficult. Recently, electron tomography (ET) is increasingly used to reveal the morphology of nanomaterials (NM) in 3D. In this study, we examined the feasibility to visualize and measure silica and gold NM in suspension using conventional bright field electron tomography.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21569366 PMCID: PMC3113930 DOI: 10.1186/1477-3155-9-17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nanobiotechnology ISSN: 1477-3155 Impact factor: 10.435
Figure 1Electron tomographic analysis of spherical gold nanoparticles. Figure 1A represents the micrograph gray value range that served for setting the threshold. The threshold was set at -15106.4, that is somewhere between the two peaks. Figure 1B shows a representative electron tomographic 3D-reconstruction of spherical gold NP. Bar: 50 nm. Figure 1C and Figure 1D show the correlation between the calculated and measured volumes and areas of ten electron tomograms.
Mean volume specific surface area of different nanomaterials based on electron tomographic reconstructions
| Type of nanomaterial | n | Volume-specific surface area (m2/cm3)a |
|---|---|---|
| Spherical Gold | 10 | 316 ± 7 |
| Branched Gold | 5 | 177 ± 29 |
| Precipitated Silica (NM-200) | 5 | 342 ± 36 |
| Pyrogenic Silica (NM-203) | 5 | 219 ± 23 |
a Values represent mean VSSA ± SEM
Figure 2Electron tomography of branched gold NP. Figure 2A represents the original micrograph of five branched gold NP taken at 0°. Figure 2B is a 0.38 nm section through the reconstructed volume shown in Figure 2C. Figure 2C shows a representative electron tomographic 3D reconstruction of branched gold NP. Arrows indicate surface extensions. Bars: 100 nm.
Figure 3Electron tomographic analyses of silica NM. The micrographs, taken at 0°, show one (Figure 3A) and two aggregates (Figure 3C) consisting of multiple primary subunits of NM-200 and NM-203, respectively. Figure 3B and Figure 3D show the corresponding ET reconstructions. Bars: 200 nm.