Literature DB >> 21569165

Is coronary computed tomography angiography a resource sparing strategy in the risk stratification and evaluation of acute chest pain? Results of a randomized controlled trial.

Adam H Miller1, Paul E Pepe, Ron Peshock, Rafia Bhore, Clyde C Yancy, Lei Xuan, Margarita M Miller, Gisselle R Huet, Clayton Trimmer, Rene Davis, Rebecca Chason, Micheal T Kashner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Annually, almost 6 million U.S. citizens are evaluated for acute chest pain syndromes (ACPSs), and billions of dollars in resources are utilized. A large part of the resource utilization results from precautionary hospitalizations that occur because care providers are unable to exclude the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) as the underlying cause of ACPSs. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the addition of coronary computerized tomography angiography (CCTA) to the concurrent standard care (SC) during an index emergency department (ED) visit could lower resource utilization when evaluating for the presence of CAD.
METHODS: Sixty participants were assigned randomly to SC or SC + CCTA groups. Participants were interviewed at the index ED visit and at 90 days. Data collected included demographics, perceptions of the value of accessing health care, and clinical outcomes. Resource utilization included services received from both the primary in-network and the primary out-of-network providers. The prospectively defined primary endpoint was the total amount of resources utilized over a 90-day follow-up period when adding CCTA to the SC risk stratification in ACPSs.
RESULTS: The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) for total resources utilized at 90 days for in-network plus out-of-network services was less for the participants in the SC + CCTA group ($10,134; SD ±$14,239) versus the SC-only group ($16,579; SD ±$19,148; p = 0.144), as was the median for the SC + CCTA ($4,288) versus SC only ($12,148; p = 0.652; median difference = -$1,291; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -$12,219 to $1,100; p = 0.652). Among the 60 total study patients, only 19 had an established diagnosis of CAD at 90 days. However, 18 (95%) of these diagnosed participants were in the SC + CCTA group. In addition, there were fewer hospital readmissions in the SC + CCTA group (6 of 30 [20%] vs. 16 of 30 [53%]; difference in proportions = -33%; 95% CI = -56% to -10%; p = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: Adding CCTA to the current ED risk stratification of ACPSs resulted in no difference in the quantity of resources utilized, but an increased diagnosis of CAD, and significantly less recidivism and rehospitalization over a 90-day follow-up period.
© 2011 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21569165      PMCID: PMC3140536          DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01066.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  41 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain.

Authors:  T H Lee; L Goldman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). II. Multisite test-retest reliability.

Authors:  J B Williams; M Gibbon; M B First; R L Spitzer; M Davies; J Borus; M J Howes; J Kane; H G Pope; B Rounsaville
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1992-08

3.  A computer protocol to predict myocardial infarction in emergency department patients with chest pain.

Authors:  L Goldman; E F Cook; D A Brand; T H Lee; G W Rouan; M C Weisberg; D Acampora; C Stasiulewicz; J Walshon; G Terranova
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-03-31       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Selective dual nuclear scanning in low-risk patients with chest pain to reliably identify and exclude acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  F M Fesmire; A D Hughes; P K Stout; J F Wojcik; D R Wharton
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain.

Authors:  James A Goldstein; Michael J Gallagher; William W O'Neill; Michael A Ross; Brian J O'Neil; Gilbert L Raff
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Clinical Features of Emergency Department Patients Presenting with Symptoms Suggestive of Acute Cardiac Ischemia: A Multicenter Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Measuring costs of guideline-driven mental health care: the Texas Medication Algorithm Project.

Authors:  Michael T. Kashner; John A. Rush; Kenneth Z. Altshuler
Journal:  J Ment Health Policy Econ       Date:  1999-09-01

8.  The impact of nonclinical factors on care use for patients with depression: a STAR*D report.

Authors:  T Michael Kashner; Madhukar H Trivedi; Annie Wicker; Maurizio Fava; Stephen R Wisniewski; A John Rush
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 5.243

9.  Development of monoclonal antibodies for an assay of cardiac troponin-I and preliminary results in suspected cases of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  G S Bodor; S Porter; Y Landt; J H Ladenson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Integrated coronary computed tomographic angiography in an office-based cardiology practice.

Authors:  Ronald P Karlsberg; Matthew J Budoff; Louise E J Thomson; John D Friedman; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Rev Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.930

View more
  7 in total

1.  Is there coronary artery disease in the cancer patient who manifests with chest pain, shortness of breath and/or tachycardia? A retrospective observational cohort.

Authors:  Adam H Miller; Maria Teresa Cruz Carreras; Stephan A Miller; Hannah E Miller; Valda D Page
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography vs Functional Stress Testing for Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew J Foy; Sanket S Dhruva; Brandon Peterson; John M Mandrola; Daniel J Morgan; Rita F Redberg
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 3.  Coronary CT angiography in acute chest pain.

Authors:  Nikhil Goyal; Arthur Stillman
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-07-13

Review 4.  Outcomes of non-invasive diagnostic modalities for the detection of coronary artery disease: network meta-analysis of diagnostic randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  George Cm Siontis; Dimitris Mavridis; John P Greenwood; Bernadette Coles; Adriani Nikolakopoulou; Peter Jüni; Georgia Salanti; Stephan Windecker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-02-21

5.  Cardiac CT angiography in current practice: An American society for preventive cardiology clinical practice statement.

Authors:  Matthew J Budoff; Suvasini Lakshmanan; Peter P Toth; Harvey S Hecht; Leslee J Shaw; David J Maron; Erin D Michos; Kim A Williams; Khurram Nasir; Andrew D Choi; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; James Min; Michael Blaha
Journal:  Am J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2022-01-20

Review 6.  Coronary computed tomography angiography in the assessment of acute chest pain in the emergency room.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Elias dos Prazeres; Roberto Caldeira Cury; Adriano Camargo de Castro Carneiro; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Is Physiologic Stress Test with Imaging Comparable to Anatomic Examination of Coronary Arteries by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography to Investigate Coronary Artery Disease? - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Waqas J Siddiqui; Muhammad Shabbir Rawala; Waqas Abid; Muhammad Zain; Murrium I Sadaf; Danish Abbasi; Chikezie Alvarez; Farah Mansoor; Syed Farhan Hasni; Sandeep Aggarwal
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-02-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.