K Herberger1, S J Rustenbach, L Grams, K C Münter, E Schäfer, M Augustin. 1. Center for Dermatological Research (CeDeF), Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing, University Clinics of Hamburg, Germany. k.herberger@uke.uni-hamburg.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and therapy of chronic wounds constitute an interdisciplinary challenge and should be oriented on the guideline standards. Although no data on the quality-of-care are available for Germany, it can be concluded from qualitative estimates and expert reports that the majority of patients are not receiving adequate treatment. OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the quality-of-care for leg ulcers in the metropolitan area of Hamburg by means of newly developed guideline-based indicators. METHODS: Leg ulcer patients of any aetiology were consecutively included. The spectrum of 220 health-care providers ranged from wound clinics, office-based practices, nursing homes to home-care services and doss houses. The survey included a clinical examination and the completion of questionnaires covering quality of life, experiences with treatment and quality of health care. RESULTS: A total of 520 patients with leg ulcers were included. Among these patients, 63% were of venous, 23% of mixed, 2% of vasculitic and 12% of other origin; 78.6% of the patients were treated with moist wound dressings. Pain therapy was performed in 54.1%, compression therapy in 53.5%. Shortcomings were noted in the diagnostic work-up and in concomitant wound care such as physiotherapy. Around 70% displayed marked to profound impairment in quality of life. The quality-of-care index showed that 64% of the indicators were met by the actual care; 61.8% of the patients exhibiting a sufficient quality-of-care, regardless of age, social status, place of abode or insurance status. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of patients received adequate therapy, many patients are not being treated properly in accordance with the guidelines.
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and therapy of chronic wounds constitute an interdisciplinary challenge and should be oriented on the guideline standards. Although no data on the quality-of-care are available for Germany, it can be concluded from qualitative estimates and expert reports that the majority of patients are not receiving adequate treatment. OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the quality-of-care for leg ulcers in the metropolitan area of Hamburg by means of newly developed guideline-based indicators. METHODS:Leg ulcerpatients of any aetiology were consecutively included. The spectrum of 220 health-care providers ranged from wound clinics, office-based practices, nursing homes to home-care services and doss houses. The survey included a clinical examination and the completion of questionnaires covering quality of life, experiences with treatment and quality of health care. RESULTS: A total of 520 patients with leg ulcers were included. Among these patients, 63% were of venous, 23% of mixed, 2% of vasculitic and 12% of other origin; 78.6% of the patients were treated with moist wound dressings. Pain therapy was performed in 54.1%, compression therapy in 53.5%. Shortcomings were noted in the diagnostic work-up and in concomitant wound care such as physiotherapy. Around 70% displayed marked to profound impairment in quality of life. The quality-of-care index showed that 64% of the indicators were met by the actual care; 61.8% of the patients exhibiting a sufficient quality-of-care, regardless of age, social status, place of abode or insurance status. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of patients received adequate therapy, many patients are not being treated properly in accordance with the guidelines.
Authors: K Herberger; K Heyer; K Protz; A Mayer; J Dissemond; S Debus; T Wild; J Schmitt; M Augustin Journal: Hautarzt Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 0.751
Authors: Finja Jockenhöfer; Harald Gollnick; Katharina Herberger; Georg Isbary; Regina Renner; Markus Stücker; Eva Valesky; Uwe Wollina; Michael Weichenthal; Sigrid Karrer; Bernhard Kuepper; Alexander Roesch; Joachim Dissemond Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 3.315