Literature DB >> 21568696

Preliminary analysis of the feasibility and safety of salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy after radiation failure: multi-institutional perioperative and short-term functional outcomes.

Sanket Chauhan1, Manoj B Patel, Rafael Coelho, Michael Liss, Bernardo Rocco, Ananth K Sivaraman, Kenneth J Palmer, Geoffrey D Coughlin, Robert G Ferrigni, Erik P Castle, Thomas E Ahlering, Eduard Parra-Davila, Vipul R Patel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Open radical prostatectomy after radiation treatment failure for prostate cancer is associated with significant morbidity. The purpose of the study is to report multi-institutional experiences while performing salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (sRARP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 15 patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer after definitive radiotherapy who underwent sRARP in three academic institutions over a 20-month period. Continence was defined as the use of 0 pads after surgery. Potency was defined as the ability to achieve erections adequate enough for penetration with or without the use of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. Biochemical recurrence after sRARP was defined as a prostate-specific antigen value of >0.2  ng/mL.
RESULTS: Radiation treatment consisted of external-beam radiation therapy (XRT) in five cases, interstitial radioactive 125-iodine brachytherapy (BT) in five cases, proton beam therapy in two cases, and XRT followed by interstitial radioactive 125-iodine BT in three cases. The median operative time, the median estimated blood loss, and the median length of hospital stay were 140.5  min (interquartile range [IQR] 97.5-157  min), 75  mL (IQR 50-100  mL), and 1 day (IQR 1-2 d), respectively. There were no rectal injuries. Two (13.3%) patients had a positive surgical margin. A total of three (20%) patients had postoperative complications. One patient had a deep vein thrombosis (Clavien grade II), one had wound infection (Clavien grade II), and one patient had an anastomotic leak (Clavien gradeId). An anastomotic stricture (Clavien grade IIIa) later developed in this same patient, which was managed by direct visual internal urethrotomy. Of the patients, 71.4% were continent. At a median follow-up of 4.6 months (IQR 3-9.75 mos), four (28.6%) patients presented with biochemical recurrence after sRARP.
CONCLUSIONS: The challenge during sRALP is the presence of extensive fibrosis and loss of dissection planes secondary to radiation therapy. It is a technically challenging but feasible procedure. The early complication rates were low, and early continence rates are encouraging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21568696     DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  13 in total

Review 1.  Current status of salvage robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for radiorecurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bernardo Rocco; Gabriele Cozzi; Matteo Giulio Spinelli; Angelica Grasso; Daniela Varisco; Rafael F Coelho; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Current role of salvage robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  D Wetherell; D Bolton; L Kavanagh; M Perera
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Salvage Therapy Options for Local Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Primary Radiotherapy: a Literature Review.

Authors:  Nicole M Golbari; Aaron E Katz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Is it worth to perform salvage radical prostatectomy for radio-recurrent prostate cancer? A literature review.

Authors:  Giorgio Calleris; Giancarlo Marra; Ettore Dalmasso; Marco Falcone; Robert Jeffrey Karnes; Alessandro Morlacco; Marco Oderda; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Francesco Soria; Paolo Gontero
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open salvage radical prostatectomy following radiotherapy.

Authors:  Patrick A Kenney; Cayce B Nawaf; Mahmoud Mustafa; Sijin Wen; Matthew F Wszolek; Curtis A Pettaway; John F Ward; John W Davis; Louis L Pisters
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.344

Review 6.  Salvage radical prostatectomy as management of locally recurrent prostate cancer: outcomes and complications.

Authors:  James S Rosoff; Stephen J Savage; Sandip M Prasad
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Salvage robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution, 5-year experience.

Authors:  Samuel D Kaffenberger; Kirk A Keegan; Neil K Bansal; Todd M Morgan; Dominic H Tang; Daniel A Barocas; David F Penson; Rodney Davis; Peter E Clark; Sam S Chang; Michael S Cookson; S Duke Herrell; Joseph A Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Management of recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy: long-term results from CALGB 9687 (Alliance), a prospective multi-institutional salvage prostatectomy series.

Authors:  James L Mohler; Susan Halabi; Stephen T Ryan; Ali Al-Daghmin; Mitchell H Sokoloff; Gary D Steinberg; Ben L Sanford; James A Eastham; Philip J Walther; Michael J Morris; Eric J Small
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.554

9.  Comparing open and robotic salvage radical prostatectomy after radiotherapy: predictors and outcomes.

Authors:  Pablo F Martinez; Agustin Romeo; Ignacio Tobia; Mariana Isola; Carlos R Giudice; Wenceslao A Villamil
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2020-08-02

Review 10.  Robotic radical prostatectomy in patients with previous prostate surgery and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Omer Acar; Tarık Esen
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2014-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.