Literature DB >> 21567847

Calibrated peer review for computer-assisted learning of biological research competencies.

Kari L Clase1, Ellen Gundlach, Nancy J Pelaez.   

Abstract

Recently, both science and technology faculty have been recognizing biological research competencies that are valued but rarely assessed. Some of these valued learning outcomes include scientific methods and thinking, critical assessment of primary papers, quantitative reasoning, communication, and putting biological research into a historical and broader social context. This article presents examples of Calibrated Peer Review (CPR) assignments that illustrate a computer-assisted method to help students achieve biological research competencies. A new release of CPR is appropriate for engaging students online in reading and writing about investigations. A participant perception inventory was designed for use as a repeated measure to discriminate among beginning, middle, and ending student perceptions. Examples are provided to demonstrate how to assess student perceptions of what they gain from instruction related to science research competencies. Results suggest that students in a large enrollment class consider CPR to be useful for helping them learn about quantitative and categorical research variables; the use of the experimental method to test ideas; the use of controls; analysis, interpretation, and presentation of data; and how to critically read primary papers.
Copyright © 2010 International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21567847     DOI: 10.1002/bmb.20415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Mol Biol Educ        ISSN: 1470-8175            Impact factor:   1.160


  8 in total

1.  Inter-Rater Reliability of Web-Based Calibrated Peer Review within a Pharmacy Curriculum.

Authors:  Alex N Isaacs; Monica L Miller; Tianyang Hu; Bailey Johnson; Zach A Weber
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Writing-to-learn in undergraduate science education: a community-based, conceptually driven approach.

Authors:  Julie A Reynolds; Christopher Thaiss; Wendy Katkin; Robert J Thompson
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Development and Validation of a Rubric for Diagnosing Students' Experimental Design Knowledge and Difficulties.

Authors:  Annwesa P Dasgupta; Trevor R Anderson; Nancy Pelaez
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Writing Assignments with a Metacognitive Component Enhance Learning in a Large Introductory Biology Course.

Authors:  Michelle Mynlieff; Anita L Manogaran; Martin St Maurice; Thomas J Eddinger
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Reflecting on Graphs: Attributes of Graph Choice and Construction Practices in Biology.

Authors:  Aakanksha Angra; Stephanie M Gardner
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Understanding the Complex Relationship between Critical Thinking and Science Reasoning among Undergraduate Thesis Writers.

Authors:  Jason E Dowd; Robert J Thompson; Leslie A Schiff; Julie A Reynolds
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Student Learning Dispositions: Multidimensional Profiles Highlight Important Differences among Undergraduate STEM Honors Thesis Writers.

Authors:  Jason E Dowd; Robert J Thompson; Leslie Schiff; Kelaine Haas; Christine Hohmann; Chris Roy; Warren Meck; John Bruno; Julie A Reynolds
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Exploring the MACH Model's Potential as a Metacognitive Tool to Help Undergraduate Students Monitor Their Explanations of Biological Mechanisms.

Authors:  Caleb M Trujillo; Trevor R Anderson; Nancy J Pelaez
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.325

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.