Literature DB >> 21567472

Use of pooled sodium acetate acetic acid formalin-preserved fecal specimens for the detection of intestinal parasites.

Maha R Gaafar1.   

Abstract

This study aimed at comparing detection of intestinal parasites from single unpreserved stool sample vs. sodium acetate acetic acid formalin (SAF)-preserved pooled samples, and stained with chlorazol black dye in routine practice. Unpreserved samples were collected from 120 patients and represented as Group I. Other three SAF-preserved samples were collected from the same patients over a 6-day period and represented as Groups IIa, IIb, and IIc. The latter groups were equally subdivided into two subgroups. The first subgroup of each of the three samples was examined individually, whereas the second subgroup of each were pooled and examined as a single specimen. All groups were examined by the routine diagnostic techniques; however, in group II when the diagnosis was uncertain, the chlorazol black dye staining procedure was carried out. Results demonstrated that out of 74 patients who continued the study, 12 cases (16%) were positive in group I, compared with 29 (39%) in the subgroups examined individually, and 27 (36%) in the pooled subgroups. Therefore, pooling of preserved fecal samples is an efficient and economical procedure for the detection of parasites. Furthermore, the chlorazol black dye was simple and effective in detecting the nuclear details of different parasites.
© 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21567472      PMCID: PMC6647609          DOI: 10.1002/jcla.20461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal        ISSN: 0887-8013            Impact factor:   2.352


  15 in total

1.  Improvement of routine diagnosis of intestinal parasites with multiple sampling and SAF-fixative in the triple-faeces-test.

Authors:  Olivier Vandenberg; Yves Van Laethem; Hichem Souayah; Waltaji Terfa Kutane; Tom van Gool; Anne Dediste
Journal:  Acta Gastroenterol Belg       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.316

2.  Use of pooled formalin-preserved fecal specimens to detect Giardia lamblia.

Authors:  S P Wahlquist; R M Williams; H Bishop; D G Addiss; J M Stewart; R J Finton; D D Juranek; J J Sullivan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Parasitology: diagnostic yield of stool examination.

Authors:  H Senay; D MacPherson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  A stool survey for enteric organisms in Aspen, Colorado.

Authors:  N N Gleason; M S Horwitz; L H Newton; G T Moore
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 2.345

5.  Comparison of pooled formalin-preserved fecal specimens with three individual samples for detection of intestinal parasites.

Authors:  W E Aldeen; J Shisenant; D Hale; J Matsen; K Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Giardiasis in childhood: an unnecessarily expensive diagnosis.

Authors:  H S Heymans; D C Aronson; M A van Hooft
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  The use of the Kohn chlorazol black fixative-stain in an intestinal parasite survey in rural Costa Rica.

Authors:  W L Bullock
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 1.276

8.  Staining of intestinal protozoa with Heidenhain's iron hematoxylin.

Authors:  Claudio Santos Ferreira
Journal:  Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 1.846

9.  Comparison of fresh versus sodium acetate acetic acid formalin preserved stool specimens for diagnosis of intestinal protozoal infections.

Authors:  T G Mank; J O Zaat; J Blotkamp; A M Polderman
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Evaluation of intestinal protozoan morphology in human fecal specimens preserved in EcoFix: comparison of Wheatley's trichrome stain and EcoStain.

Authors:  L S Garcia; R Y Shimizu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.