Literature DB >> 21567447

Cross sectional geometry of the forelimb skeleton and flight mode in pelecaniform birds.

Erin L R Simons1, Tobin L Hieronymus, Patrick M O'Connor.   

Abstract

Avian wing elements have been shown to experience both dorsoventral bending and torsional loads during flapping flight. However, not all birds use continuous flapping as a primary flight strategy. The pelecaniforms exhibit extraordinary diversity in flight mode, utilizing flapping, flap-gliding, and soaring. Here we (1) characterize the cross-sectional geometry of the three main wing bone (humerus, ulna, carpometacarpus), (2) use elements of beam theory to estimate resistance to loading, and (3) examine patterns of variation in hypothesized loading resistance relative to flight and diving mode in 16 species of pelecaniform birds. Patterns emerge that are common to all species, as well as some characteristics that are flight- and diving-mode specific. In all birds examined, the distal most wing segment (carpometacarpus) is the most elliptical (relatively high I(max) /I(min) ) at mid-shaft, suggesting a shape optimized to resist bending loads in a dorsoventral direction. As primary flight feathers attach at an oblique angle relative to the long axis of the carpometacarpus, they are likely responsible for inducing bending of this element during flight. Moreover, among flight modes examined the flapping group (cormorants) exhibits more elliptical humeri and carpometacarpi than other flight modes, perhaps pertaining to the higher frequency of bending loads in these elements. The soaring birds (pelicans and gannets) exhibit wing elements with near-circular cross-sections and higher polar moments of area than in the flap and flap-gliding birds, suggesting shapes optimized to offer increased resistance to torsional loads. This analysis of cross-sectional geometry has enhanced our interpretation of how the wing elements are being loaded and ultimately how they are being used during normal activities.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21567447     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  12 in total

1.  The peregrine falcon's rapid dive: on the adaptedness of the arm skeleton and shoulder girdle.

Authors:  Anke Schmitz; Nele Ondreka; Julia Poleschinski; Dominik Fischer; Helmut Schmitz; Adrian Klein; Horst Bleckmann; Christoph Bruecker
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Predicting the bending properties of long bones: Insights from an experimental mouse model.

Authors:  Sarah J Peacock; Brittney R Coats; J Kyle Kirkland; Courtney A Tanner; Theodore Garland; Kevin M Middleton
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.868

3.  Functional morphometric analysis of the furcula in mesozoic birds.

Authors:  Roger A Close; Emily J Rayfield
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Qualitative skeletal correlates of wing shape in extant birds (Aves: Neoaves).

Authors:  Tobin L Hieronymus
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Wing bone laminarity is not an adaptation for torsional resistance in bats.

Authors:  Andrew H Lee; Erin L R Simons
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Wing bone geometry reveals active flight in Archaeopteryx.

Authors:  Dennis F A E Voeten; Jorge Cubo; Emmanuel de Margerie; Martin Röper; Vincent Beyrand; Stanislav Bureš; Paul Tafforeau; Sophie Sanchez
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Scaling of bird wings and feathers for efficient flight.

Authors:  T N Sullivan; M A Meyers; E Arzt
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Ecology and caudal skeletal morphology in birds: the convergent evolution of pygostyle shape in underwater foraging taxa.

Authors:  Ryan N Felice; Patrick M O'Connor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Microstructure and cross-sectional shape of limb bones in Great Horned Owls and Red-tailed Hawks: how do these features relate to differences in flight and hunting behavior?

Authors:  Crystal A Marelli; Erin L R Simons
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Morphological diversification of biomechanical traits: mustelid locomotor specializations and the macroevolution of long bone cross-sectional morphology.

Authors:  Brandon M Kilbourne; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.