Literature DB >> 21567445

Free body analysis, beam mechanics, and finite element modeling of the mandible of Alligator mississippiensis.

Laura B Porro1, Casey M Holliday, Fred Anapol, Lupita C Ontiveros, Lolita T Ontiveros, Callum F Ross.   

Abstract

The mechanical behavior of mammalian mandibles is well-studied, but a comprehensive biomechanical analysis (incorporating detailed muscle architecture, accurate material properties, and three-dimensional mechanical behavior) of an extant archosaur mandible has never been carried out. This makes it unclear how closely models of extant and extinct archosaur mandibles reflect reality and prevents comparisons of structure-function relationships in mammalian and archosaur mandibles. We tested hypotheses regarding the mechanical behavior of the mandible of Alligator mississippiensis by analyzing reaction forces and bending, shear, and torsional stress regimes in six models of varying complexity. Models included free body analysis using basic lever arm mechanics, 2D and 3D beam models, and three high-resolution finite element models of the Alligator mandible, incorporating, respectively, isotropic bone without sutures, anisotropic bone with sutures, and anisotropic bone with sutures and contact between the mandible and the pterygoid flange. Compared with the beam models, the Alligator finite element models exhibited less spatial variability in dorsoventral bending and sagittal shear stress, as well as lower peak values for these stresses, suggesting that Alligator mandibular morphology is in part designed to reduce these stresses during biting. However, the Alligator models exhibited greater variability in the distribution of mediolateral and torsional stresses than the beam models. Incorporating anisotropic bone material properties and sutures into the model reduced dorsoventral and torsional stresses within the mandible, but led to elevated mediolateral stresses. These mediolateral stresses were mitigated by the addition of a pterygoid-mandibular contact, suggesting important contributions from, and trade-offs between, material properties and external constraints in Alligator mandible design. Our results suggest that beam modeling does not accurately represent the mechanical behavior of the Alligator mandible, including important performance metrics such as magnitude and orientation of reaction forces, and mediolateral bending and torsional stress distributions. J.Morphol. 2011. © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21567445     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  22 in total

1.  Estimating maximum bite performance in Tyrannosaurus rex using multi-body dynamics.

Authors:  K T Bates; P L Falkingham
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Functional anatomy and feeding biomechanics of a giant Upper Jurassic pliosaur (Reptilia: Sauropterygia) from Weymouth Bay, Dorset, UK.

Authors:  Davide Foffa; Andrew R Cuff; Judyth Sassoon; Emily J Rayfield; Mark N Mavrogordato; Michael J Benton
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Biomechanics of the mandible of Macaca mulatta during the power stroke of mastication: Loading, deformation, and strain regimes and the impact of food type.

Authors:  Olga Panagiotopoulou; Jose Iriarte-Diaz; Hyab Mehari Abraha; Andrea B Taylor; Simon Wilshin; Paul C Dechow; Callum F Ross
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 3.895

4.  In vivo bone strain and finite element modeling of a rhesus macaque mandible during mastication.

Authors:  Olga Panagiotopoulou; José Iriarte-Diaz; Simon Wilshin; Paul C Dechow; Andrea B Taylor; Hyab Mehari Abraha; Sharifah F Aljunid; Callum F Ross
Journal:  Zoology (Jena)       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Anatomy and cranial functional morphology of the small-bodied dinosaur Fruitadens haagarorum from the Upper Jurassic of the USA.

Authors:  Richard J Butler; Laura B Porro; Peter M Galton; Luis M Chiappe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The role of the sutures in biomechanical dynamic simulation of a macaque cranial finite element model: implications for the evolution of craniofacial form.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Sarah A Wood; Ian R Grosse; Callum F Ross; Uriel Zapata; Craig D Byron; Barth W Wright; David S Strait
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 2.064

7.  In vivo bone strain and finite element modeling of the mandible of Alligator mississippiensis.

Authors:  Laura B Porro; Keith A Metzger; Jose Iriarte-Diaz; Callum F Ross
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Ontogeny of the alligator cartilago transiliens and its significance for sauropsid jaw muscle evolution.

Authors:  Henry P Tsai; Casey M Holliday
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Analyzing taphonomic deformation of ankylosaur skulls using retrodeformation and finite element analysis.

Authors:  Victoria M Arbour; Philip J Currie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Why the long face? The mechanics of mandibular symphysis proportions in crocodiles.

Authors:  Christopher W Walmsley; Peter D Smits; Michelle R Quayle; Matthew R McCurry; Heather S Richards; Christopher C Oldfield; Stephen Wroe; Phillip D Clausen; Colin R McHenry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.