Literature DB >> 21567138

Diagnosis and neurosurgical treatment of glossopharyngeal neuralgia: clinical findings and 3-D visualization of neurovascular compression in 19 consecutive patients.

C Gaul1, P Hastreiter, A Duncker, R Naraghi.   

Abstract

Glossopharyngeal neuralgia is a rare condition with neuralgic sharp pain in the pharyngeal and auricular region. Classical glossopharyngeal neuralgia is caused by neurovascular compression at the root entry zone of the nerve. Regarding the rare occurrence of glossopharyngeal neuralgia, we report clinical data and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in a case series of 19 patients, of whom 18 underwent surgery. Two patients additionally suffered from trigeminal neuralgia and three from additional symptomatic vagal nerve compression. In all patients, ipsilateral neurovascular compression syndrome of the IX cranial nerve could be shown by high-resolution MRI and image processing, which was confirmed intraoperatively. Additional neurovascular compression of the V cranial nerve was shown in patients suffering from trigeminal neuralgia. Vagal nerve neurovascular compression could be seen in all patients during surgery. Sixteen patients were completely pain free after surgery without need of anticonvulsant treatment. As a consequence of the operation, two patients suffered from transient cerebrospinal fluid hypersecretion as a reaction to Teflon implants. One patient suffered postoperatively from deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Six patients showed transient cranial nerve dysfunctions (difficulties in swallowing, vocal cord paresis), but all recovered within 1 week. One patient complained of a gnawing and burning pain in the cervical area. Microvascular decompression is a second-line treatment after failure of standard medical treatment with high success in glossopharyngeal neuralgia. High-resolution MRI and 3D visualization of the brainstem and accompanying vessels as well as the cranial nerves is helpful in identifying neurovascular compression before microvascular decompression procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21567138      PMCID: PMC3173624          DOI: 10.1007/s10194-011-0349-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Headache Pain        ISSN: 1129-2369            Impact factor:   7.277


Introduction

Glossopharyngeal neuralgia is a rare entity with a reported incidence of 0.2–0.7/100,000/year. Epidemiological data are based on the extrapolation of few data from one center and recently from the analysis of a medical record database [1-4]. The frequency of glossopharyngeal neuralgia is underestimated. This is due to difficulties in clinical diagnosis, differentiation from trigeminal neuralgia and unawareness of the disease. Glossopharyngeal neuralgia shares several characteristics with trigeminal neuralgia: (a) paroxysmal attacks of brief electric shock-like stabbing pain, (b) trigger mechanisms, e.g., speaking, swallowing, eating, breathing, cold air and slight touch of the mouth and pharyngeal region, (c) initially good response to carbamazepine, and (d) association with neurovascular compression. Neurovascular compression as a source of irritation of cranial nerves was discussed first in 1929 by Dandy [5]. Jannetta’s operative work [12] [e.g., microvascular decompression (MVD)] provided evidence for this concept. The International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) distinguishes between classical (ICHD-II 13.2.1) and symptomatic glossopharyngeal neuralgia (ICHD-II 13.2.2) [6]. However, based only on clinical findings a discrimination of both variants is not possible. “Idiopathic” cranial nerve neuralgias are mostly attributed to a neurovascular nerve compression syndrome at the root entry zone of the respective cranial nerve. The primary goal of diagnostic procedures is to rule out symptomatic glossopharyngeal neuralgia. Pain attacks in glossopharyngeal neuralgia are short (just for seconds), severe and stabbing in the pharyngeal region, including the tonsilar fossa, base of the tongue and below the angle of the jaw. The pain can also be felt in the areas innervated by the auricular and pharyngeal branches of the vagus nerve. Some authors propose distinguishing between a pharyngeal, otalgic and a vagal subtype of neuralgia and therefore suggest the term “vagoglossopharyngeal” neuralgia [7, 8]. A coincidence of trigeminal neuralgia and glossopharyngeal neuralgia in the same patient complicates the clinical diagnosis. However, pain attacks do not occur simultaneously in both areas [7]. Due to the rare occurrence of glossopharyngeal neuralgia, we report a case series of 19 patients to describe the clinical presentation, imaging findings and response to medical and neurosurgical treatment in detail.

Methods

We report a series of 19 consecutive patients suffering from glossopharyngeal neuralgia referred for surgery due to unsatisfying response to previous medical treatment. The clinical appearance, pain localization, medical treatment and course of the disease were analyzed. The clinical symptoms were classified into pharyngeal, otalgic and vagal manifestation type of glossopharyngeal neuralgia. Data collection was done by retrospective analysis of the patients’ medical records. All patients were treated between 1994 and 2009 in the Department of Neurosurgery of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany. Detailed prior history and clinical examination with special attention to cranial nerve function was done in all patients. All patients underwent high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 3D visualization of the brainstem and accompanying vessels and cranial nerves in this region as described by Naraghi and Hastreiter [9-11]. Clinical data were correlated with MRI findings. The outcome and complications of 18 neurosurgically treated (MVD) patients were analyzed. For operative procedures, patients were placed in a semi-sitting position on the operating table; monitoring including precordial transthoracic echocardiography and somatosensory potentials was done, and a retrosigmoidal craniotomy was performed with extension to the foramen magnum. After incision of the dura, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was gathered from the cerebellopontine cistern (cisterna magna) and the cerebellar hemisphere. The inferior and biventral lobe was smoothly retracted to approach the lateral cerebellopontine cistern. The IX and X nerve were accessed at their exit zone from the brainstem and the conflicting vessel was identified. Dissection of the vessel was done according to the trigeminal nerve decompression suggested by Jannetta [12]. A Teflon interpositum was chosen to keep the vessel off [12]. All statistical analyses were performed with PASW Statistics 18.0.0. The demographic data of men and women were compared using t test analysis.

Results

Clinical picture and course of disease

Eleven men and eight women were investigated (Table 1). Mean age at onset of disease was 48.5 years [range 26–83, women (mean) 48.4 years, men (mean) 48.6 years]. Age at the time of MVD in the 18 operated patients was 54.5 years (mean). No significant difference was found between men and woman concerning either age of onset or age at the time of MVD. Twelve patients were affected on the left side and seven on the right side (1.7:1). Mean duration of disease before MVD was performed in 18 of the 19 patients was 6.5 (range 1–20) years. All 19 patients showed a pharyngeal pain manifestation. In addition, 12 patients showed symptoms of the otalgic type and three showed vagal-type symptoms (cough and raucousness accompanying the pain attacks, laryngeal pain attack localization). In two patients, additional trigeminal neuralgia was diagnosed. One of these had undergone MVD for trigeminal neuralgia on both sides previously (no. 17). Following the ICHD-II-criteria, classical glossopharyngeal neuralgia was diagnosed in 18 patients, one patient (no. 11) showed diminished sensibility in the palatine and pharyngeal area, but no other pathology than a neurovascular compression syndrome was diagnosed. In this patient, there was no other evidence of a symptomatic manifestation. In one patient, hearing loss and diminished sensibility in the trigeminal area was found, but these could be explained by previous thermocoagulation and a first MVD procedure in the past (no. 10). Patients with symptomatic glossopharyngeal neuralgia due to intracranial mass (tumor) or inflammation were excluded from our series. Medical treatment with anticonvulsants was used in all patients (mostly carbamazepine). All patients were treated with an adequate dose regime for several years. Failure to medical treatment was shown by all patients except one. By the time of evaluation for neurosurgical treatment, one patient (no. 1) was nearly free of symptoms under medical treatment with carbamazepine. Therefore, he did not undergo operation.
Table 1

Overview of epidemiologic data, case history, MRI findings, treatment and outcome of the patients

No.Age/sexDuration of disease (years)Clinically affected cranial nervesMain pain manifestationClinical findings3D Visualzation: neurovascular contactCourse of the diseaseMedical treatment previous to MVDOperation performedCourse of the disease following MVD
168/m10Right IX, XPharyngeal, otalgicCNE unremarkable

Compression of CN IX, X

by PICA. VA ectasia and elongation on both sides

Under medical treatment, usually free of painCBZNot doneMVD not done
254/m1Left IXPharyngealCNE unremarkable, hypertension

Compression of CN IX, X

by the VA and PICA

Initial improvement by medical treatment; during the course of disease loss of effectiveness of medical treatmentCBZMVD 2003Transient hoarseness, normalization of hypertension, sustained pain-free status
345/f2Right IX, XPharyngeal, otalgic, additional constant pain in the left side of the face and the incisorsCNE unremarkableCompression of the CN IX, X by PICARefractory to medical treatmentNot knownMVD 2004Transient CSF hypersecretion, pulmonary embolism postoperatively, slight dropping of the palate to the right side, transient recurrent paresis. Pain free during the first week after surgery, afterward persistent dysesthesia of the cervical area on the right side
444/f2Left IX, XPharyngeal, later on additional vagal manifestation with cough and hoarseness during pain attacksCNE unremarkableCompression of the CN IX, X by PICADuring course of disease refractory to medical treatmentGabapentin, pregabalinMVD 2005Transient CSF hypersecretion, sustained pain reduction, but not pain free. Transient recurrent paresis on the left
558/f18Left IXPharyngeal, otalgicHypesthesia of the right face, decrease of the right corneal reflexCompression of the CN IX by PICADuring course of disease refractory to medical treatmentCBZ, gabapentin, pregabalinMVD 1999 and 2005Pain-free status for 2 years after the first MVD. Sustained pain-free status after the second MVD. Nonrecurring epileptic seizure after the second MVD
639/m5Left IXPharyngeal, otalgicCNE unremarkableCompression of the CN IX, X by PICAInitially complete pain control by CBZ, later on refractory to medical treatment and increase of attack frequencyCBZ, gabapentinMVD 2005Sustained pain free, no complications
752/f1Left IXPharyngeal, otalgicCNE unremarkableCompression of the CN IX, X by PICARefractory to medical treatment, weight loss due to inability of regular food intakeFlupirtine, pregabalinMVD 2005Sustained pain-free status, no complications
857/m3Left V, IXPharyngeal, trigeminalCNE unremarkable, hypertensionCompression of the CN IX, X by VA and compression of CN V by AICAInitially trigeminal neuralgia, later on additional glossopharyngeal neuralgia refractory to medical treatmentIntolerability of CBZ, then on combination of topiramate, pregabalin, gabapentin, and amitriptylineMVD 2007Sustained pain-free status, transient recurrent paresis on the left side, dropping of the palate on the left
955/m13Left IXPharyngealCNE unremarkableCompression of the CN IX, X by PICAInitially good improvement by medical treatment, later on refractory to medical treatmentCBZ, gabapentinMVD 2007Sustained pain-free status, no complications
1071/f1Left V, IXPharyngeal, otalgicHypesthesia in the face on the left side (caused by previous thermocoagulation of the ganglion Gasseri), vertigo, deafness on the left sideCompression of the CN IX, X by PICAInitially left-sided trigeminal neuralgia, pain-free status for 5 years after thermocoagulation, MVD 19 years after onset of disease, followed by glossopharyngeal neuralgia. Second to MVD 20 years after onset of diseaseCBZMVD 1992 and 1995Sustained pain-free status, no complications
1167/f14Right IXPharyngeal, otalgicPharyngeal and palatinal hypesthesia, hypertensionCompression of the CN IX, X by PICAInitially good response to CBZ, later on refractory to medical treatmentCBZMVD 1996Sustained pain-free status, no complications
1263/f7Left IXPharyngeal, otalgicCNE unremarkableCompression of the CN IX, X by PICAInitially good response to CBZ, later on refractory to medical treatmentCBZMVD 2000Sustained pain-free status, no complications
1358/m6Left IXPharyngealCNE unremarkableCompression of the CN IX, X by PICAInitially good response to medical treatment, pain-free status for 2 years, then refractory to medical treatmentCBZ, gabapentin, tramadolMVD 2000Sustained pain-free status, no complications
1446/m20Left IXPharyngealCNE unremarkableCompression of the CN IX, X by PICAInitially good response to medical treatment, later on refractory to treatmentCBZ, gabapentinMVD 2007Sustained pain-free status, transient dysphagia
1586/m3Right IXPharyngeal, otalgic, additional pain at the right throatCNE unremarkable, hypertensionCompression of the CN IX, X by PICARefractory to medical treatment during the course of diseaseCBZ, gabapentin, opioidsMVD 2009Sustained pain-free status, no complications
1655/m1Left IXPharyngeal, laryngealCNE unremarkableCompression of the CN IX, X by PICAInitially responsive to CBZ but with side effects, no satisfactory response to pregabalinCBZ, pregabalinMVD 2008Sustained pain-free status, no complications
1736/f3Right IXPharyngeal, laryngeal, otalgicCNE unremarkableCompression of the CN IX, X by PICA2001 trigeminal neuralgia left sided, 2005 trigeminal neuralgia right sided, initially responsive to CBZCBZMVD 2001 (left V), MVD 2005 (right V), MVD 2008 (right IX and X)Transient hoarseness, sustained pain-free status
1849/m5Right IXPharyngeal, otalgicCNE unremarkableCompression of the CN IX, X by PICAInitially responsive to CBZ, later on refractory to medical treatmentCBZ, gabapentin, pregabalin, amitriptyline, opioidsMVD 2007 not successful, MVD 2008Sustained pain-free status, no complications
1947/m12Right IXPharyngeal, otalgicCNE unremarkable, hypertensionCompression of the CN IX, X by PICA and VA ectasiaTonsillectomy was not successful as initial treatment, later on refractory to medical treatmentCBZ, gabapentinMVD 2008Sustained pain-free status, no complications

CN cranial nerve, PICA posterior inferior cerebelli artery, VA vertebral artery, CBZ carbamazepine, MVD microvascular decompression

Overview of epidemiologic data, case history, MRI findings, treatment and outcome of the patients Compression of CN IX, X by PICA. VA ectasia and elongation on both sides Compression of CN IX, X by the VA and PICA CN cranial nerve, PICA posterior inferior cerebelli artery, VA vertebral artery, CBZ carbamazepine, MVD microvascular decompression

MRI findings

All patients underwent high-resolution MRI, and the data were subjected to image processing and 3D visualization (illustrated in patient no 16) (Figs. 1, 2). Data were analyzed with 3D visualization revealing a neurovascular compression syndrome of the glossopharyngeal nerve in all patients, ipsilateral to the pain manifestation. In addition, MRI showed ipsilateral neurovascular compression of the vagal nerve in all patients. In two patients, additional ipsilateral neurovascular compression of the trigeminal nerve could be shown. Vessels, which were assumed to cause nerve compression, are listed for every patient (Table 1). Nerve compression by the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) was found in 15 patients, by the vertebral artery and PICA in three patients, and the vertebral artery plus the anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) in another patient.
Fig. 1

3D visualization of the neurovascular relationships in a case with left-sided glossopharyngeal neuralgia. With the presented method, we obtain a global overview of the neurovascular relations. We can move the picture in any direction and detect the presence of relevant vessels and cranial nerves and demonstrate the neurovascular compression at the root entry zone of the cranial nerves IX and X. The position as seen during microsurgery (compared to Fig. 2). BA basilar artery, VA vertebral artery, PICA posterior inferior cerebellar artery, V rigeminal nerve, VII and VIII facial and vestibulocochlear nerve, IX glossopharyngeal nerve, X vagus nerve, NVC neurovascular compression

Fig. 2

Intraoperative finding of the visualized case in a–c. The vertebral artery runs from caudal to rostral, while the (a) PICA runs in an upward loop close to the surface of the medulla and the root entry zone of the cranial nerves IX and X (b) inducing a neurovascular compression at this site. Adequate decompression was (c) achieved by insertion of Teflon. The intraoperative findings correspond very clearly to the results of the 3D visualization

3D visualization of the neurovascular relationships in a case with left-sided glossopharyngeal neuralgia. With the presented method, we obtain a global overview of the neurovascular relations. We can move the picture in any direction and detect the presence of relevant vessels and cranial nerves and demonstrate the neurovascular compression at the root entry zone of the cranial nerves IX and X. The position as seen during microsurgery (compared to Fig. 2). BA basilar artery, VA vertebral artery, PICA posterior inferior cerebellar artery, V rigeminal nerve, VII and VIII facial and vestibulocochlear nerve, IX glossopharyngeal nerve, X vagus nerve, NVC neurovascular compression Intraoperative finding of the visualized case in a–c. The vertebral artery runs from caudal to rostral, while the (a) PICA runs in an upward loop close to the surface of the medulla and the root entry zone of the cranial nerves IX and X (b) inducing a neurovascular compression at this site. Adequate decompression was (c) achieved by insertion of Teflon. The intraoperative findings correspond very clearly to the results of the 3D visualization

Outcome of MVD

Of the 18 patients, 16 who underwent microsurgical decompression of the glossopharyngeal nerve were completely pain free after the procedure. They no longer needed any anticonvulsant or other pain medication. One patient (no. 4) improved substantially and medication could be reduced (she currently only takes gabapentin). One patient (no. 5) was pain free for 2 years, and then neuralgia returned. After a second MVD she was sustained pain free.

Complications of MVD

Two patients (nos. 3 and 4) suffered from transient CSF hypersecretion as a reaction to the Teflon implant. CSF examination revealed lymphocytic pleocytosis. No causative bacteria could be found in CSF. Antibiotics were administered while CSF samples were taken repeatedly. Symptoms regressed within a few days. One patient (no. 3) suffered from postoperative deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, which prompted oral anticoagulation. Six patients showed transient cranial nerve dysfunctions with difficulties in swallowing or vocal cord paresis, but in all cases dysfunction resolved within 1 week. One patient (no. 3) complained of a gnawing and burning pain in the cervical area, but no signs of cranial nerve dysfunction were found on physical examination. Pre-existing disturbance in sensitivity in the trigeminal area of the face subsisted after surgical intervention. No patient suffered any hearing reduction as a result of surgery.

Discussion

This case series focuses on symptomatology and response to medical and surgical treatment in patients suffering from glossopharyngeal neuralgia. Diagnosis should be considered if neuralgic pain occurs in the pharyngeal region or in the auditory canal. The coincidence of trigeminal and glossopharyngeal neuralgia that was found in two patients of our series (9:5%) is comparable to previous reports [3, 13, 14]. The coincidence of neuralgias of the V and the IX cranial nerves can be explained by the close anatomic relationship of the brainstem area, peripheral connections between both nerves and central convergence [7]. Neurovascular compression on the vagal nerve could be shown by MRI techniques in all of our 19 patients, but only three showed clinical symptoms corresponding to the vagal nerve. The infrequently clinically diagnosed coincidence of both neuralgias in contrast to the MRI findings may be explained by underreporting of vagal symptoms and subclinical involvement, such as asymptomatic bradycardia, which are not noticed by the patients themselves. Furthermore, it may be very difficult to decide whether syncopes in this population can be explained by vagal affection or the wide spectrum of alternative etiologies. The presented data support MVD on the basis of image processing as a safe and promising second-line treatment after failure of standard medical treatment or unacceptable side effects of drug therapy. ICHD-II criteria (13.2.1) for classical glossopharyngeal neuralgia require an inconspicuous neurological examination (criteria D) [6]. More detailed clinical examination revealed subtle sensory deficit in some patients (nos. 5, 10, 11). Nevertheless, we did not see patients with any other lesion than neurovascular compression. This may be explained by a selection bias. Patients who were referred to neurosurgery and who underwent previous routine MRI, identifying symptomatic disease, may have been treated elsewhere. In cases of glossopharyngeal neuralgia, MRI (including T2, T1, FLAIR) is suggested for the exclusion of symptomatic forms and for a first hint of neurovascular compression. MR-angiography (MRA) can show the anatomical relationship between cranial nerve and vessels (in particular arteries) [13]. In case of failure of medical therapy, or when unacceptable side effects occur, specialized MRI investigations including 3D constructive interference in steady state (CISS) are required. Using a specialized computer-based analysis, neurovascular compression in the root entry zone of the cranial nerve may be visualized as it was the case in all patients of our series (Fig. 1a, b) [9]. This finding is consistent with the findings of Akimoto [8] who showed that surgical findings in patients with trigeminal neuralgia correlate with MRI findings in 3D reconstruction from MRI imaging. Of the 18 patients, 16 who underwent MVD became permanently pain free and the two remaining patients showed pain reduction. In former studies, pain-free rates in 76% of the patients and improvement in an additional 16% of patients were reported [15]. Long-term results of the intervention are good; after 10 years most patients remained pain free [14, 15]. As reported in literature, the PICA is the most frequent causative vessel, which compressed the root entry zone of the glossopharyngeal nerve in our series. This situation could be reliably visualized in all of the reported patients by high-resolution MRI and MRA, followed by image processing and 3D visualization. Accurate visualization is necessary before attempting operative therapy. Risks of surgery consist of the common risk of anesthesiology, bleeding and infection. Special risks are hearing loss, hoarseness and difficulties in swallowing; these symptoms are temporary in the overwhelming majority of the patients. Teflon implant is a suspected cause of CSF hypersecretion, which results in postoperative headache. This was confirmed by a clinical study showing that lumbar puncture with drainage of 20–30 ml CSF results in sufficient headache relief [16]. To improve safety during the intervention, all patients underwent continuous intraoperative monitoring of the acoustic nerve and the lower cranial nerve EMG signals also in our series. We observed one life-threatening complication (pulmonary embolism in patient no. 3) and one patient with a non-recurring epileptic seizure (no. 5). All cranial nerve dysfunctions were transient (for details see Table 1). In a national registration of US hospitals 1,326 patients with trigeminal neuralgia, 237 with hemifacial spasm and 27 with glossopharyngeal neuralgia were reported. All patients were treated with MVD (Jannetta’s procedure) [17-19]. Mortality in this series was 0.3%; neurological deficit was reported in 1.7% of cases. The rate of adverse events depended on the frequency of the intervention in the hospital. Of the 19 patients, 6 (32%) in our study suffered from additional arterial hypertension. Autoptic studies and clinical observations show weak evidence of a relationship between hypertension and neurovascular compression of the vagal and glossopharyngeal nerves, especially if left sided with compression of the rostral ventrolateral medulla oblongata [20-22]. Microvascular decompression improved arterial hypertension in some of these patients [20-22]. However, it has to be considered that hypertension is frequent in a cohort with a mean age of 54.5 years. Therefore, systematic follow-up with long-term blood pressure measurement is recommended in future studies.

Conclusion

Patients suffering from uncommon facial pain syndromes including neuralgias of the cranial nerves should be treated in centers focusing on headaches and facial pain, if first-line medical treatment fails or diagnosis remains unclear. Interdisciplinary workup of cases opens the door to successful treatment even in difficult situations. Modern techniques of imaging such as high-resolution MRI and subsequent image processing with 3D visualization provide precise diagnosis of potential neurovascular compression of various cranial nerves (especially vagal, glossopharyngeal and trigeminal nerves). Microvascular decompression is a safe and successful treatment alternative in patients with failure or several side effects of medical treatment.
  18 in total

1.  Analysis and 3-dimensional visualization of neurovascular compression syndromes.

Authors:  Peter Hastreiter; Ramin Naraghi; Bernd Tomandl; Agatha Bonk; Rudolf Fahlbusch
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 2.  Microvascular decompression for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm, and glossopharyngeal neuralgia: three surgical approach variations: technical note.

Authors:  Tsutomu Hitotsumatsu; Toshio Matsushima; Tooru Inoue
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Preoperative evaluation of neurovascular compression in patients with trigeminal neuralgia by use of three-dimensional reconstruction from two types of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Hideaki Akimoto; Tsukasa Nagaoka; Tadashi Nariai; Yoshiaki Takada; Kikuo Ohno; Norio Yoshino
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Three-dimensional visualization of neurovascular relationships in the posterior fossa: technique and clinical application.

Authors:  Ramin Naraghi; Peter Hastreiter; Bernd Tomandl; Agatha Bonk; Walter Huk; Rudolf Fahlbusch
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 5.  Trigeminal neuralgia and glossopharyngeal neuralgia.

Authors:  Todd D Rozen
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 6.  Microvascular decompression in the treatment of hypertension: review and update.

Authors:  E I Levy; A M Scarrow; P J Jannetta
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2001-01

7.  Glossopharyngeal (vagoglossopharyngeal) neuralgia: a study of 217 cases.

Authors:  J G Rushton; J C Stevens; R H Miller
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1981-04

8.  Incidence of facial pain in the general population.

Authors:  Joseph S H A Koopman; Jeanne P Dieleman; Frank J Huygen; Marissa de Mos; Carola G M Martin; Miriam C J M Sturkenboom
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Microvascular decompression surgery in the United States, 1996 to 2000: mortality rates, morbidity rates, and the effects of hospital and surgeon volumes.

Authors:  Steven N Kalkanis; Emad N Eskandar; Bob S Carter; Fred G Barker
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Microvascular decompression for glossopharyngeal neuralgia: long-term effectiveness and complication avoidance.

Authors:  John H Sampson; Peter M Grossi; Katsuyuki Asaoka; Takanori Fukushima
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  [Facial and eye pain - Neurological differential diagnosis].

Authors:  O Kastrup; H-C Diener; C Gaul
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Neurotologic Complications Following Microvascular Decompression: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Matthew Bartindale; Ayah Mohamed; Jason Bell; Matthew Kircher; Jacqueline Hill; Douglas Anderson; John Leonetti
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-02-14

3.  3D Computer graphics simulation to obtain optimal surgical exposure during microvascular decompression of the glossopharyngeal nerve.

Authors:  Tetsuya Hiraishi; Toshio Matsushima; Masatou Kawashima; Yukiko Nakahara; Yuichi Takahashi; Hiroshi Ito; Makoto Oishi; Yukihiko Fujii
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 4.  Hearing Loss following Posterior Fossa Microvascular Decompression: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Matthew Bartindale; Matthew Kircher; William Adams; Neelam Balasubramanian; Jeffrey Liles; Jason Bell; John Leonetti
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Duration of remission phase of 36 Korean patients with glossopharyngeal neuralgia.

Authors:  Myong-Soo Kang; Do-Wan Kim; Sung-Min Kim; Chan Kim; Young-Ki Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-04-22

6.  Microvascular decompression for glossopharyngeal neuralgia using intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring: Technical case report.

Authors:  Yasushi Motoyama; Ichiro Nakagawa; Tsunenori Takatani; Hun-Soo Park; Yukiko Kotani; Yoshitaka Tanaka; Pritam Gurung; Young-Soo Park; Hiroyuki Nakase
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-01-07

Review 7.  Trigeminal Neuralgia, Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia, and Myofascial Pain Dysfunction Syndrome: An Update.

Authors:  Mohammad Khan; Shamima Easmin Nishi; Siti Nazihahasma Hassan; Md Asiful Islam; Siew Hua Gan
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2017-07-30       Impact factor: 3.037

8.  Recurrent syncope due to glossopharyngeal neuralgia.

Authors:  Alexander W den Hartog; Evelien Jansen; Jasper E Kal; Debby Duyndam; Jeldican Visser; Pepijn van den Munckhof; Jonas S S G de Jong; Krischan D Sjauw
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2016-09-28

9.  An uncommonly common: Glossopharyngeal neuralgia.

Authors:  P M Singh; Manpreet Kaur; Anjan Trikha
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.383

10.  Advances in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Cui; Zhipei Ling
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2015-07-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.