PURPOSE: The aim of this experimental study is to investigate cardiovascular tolerance of blockade of beta-adrenergic receptors in an endotoxin model. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled study. SETTING: Animal laboratory in a university medical center. METHODS: Ten anesthetized, mechanically ventilated pigs were challenged with intravenous lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to achieve a status of profound hypodynamic shock. Systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics and cardiac output were continuously monitored throughout the 5-h study period, and blood samples were taken at baseline (T - 30 min), 1 h from the beginning of LPS infusion (T + 60 min), and every 2 h (T + 180 min and T + 300 min). Animals were randomly assigned to continuous intravenous esmolol infusion titrated to decrease heart rate by 20% or isotonic saline. RESULTS: Esmolol decreased heart rate by 20%, while in the saline group, heart rate increased by 7% and 22% at T + 180 min and T + 300 min, respectively (p < 0.001). In esmolol-treated animals, cardiac index decreased by 9% at T + 180 min and by 2% at T + 300 min, and in controls by 14% at T + 180 min and by 27% at T + 300 min (p = 0.870). In esmolol-treated animals, median (interquartile range, IQR) stroke index was 31 (6) and 47 (11) ml/min/m(2) at T + 180 min and T + 300 min, respectively, and decreased steadily from 45 (20) to 18 (13) ml/min/m(2) in controls (p = 0.030). There were no significant differences between groups for any other hemodynamics variables, except for systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: In large animals with endotoxemic shock, continuous infusion of esmolol, a selective beta-1 adrenergic blocker, titrated to decrease heart rate by 20%, was well tolerated and may offset LPS-induced cardiac dysfunction by a preload positive effect.
PURPOSE: The aim of this experimental study is to investigate cardiovascular tolerance of blockade of beta-adrenergic receptors in an endotoxin model. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled study. SETTING: Animal laboratory in a university medical center. METHODS: Ten anesthetized, mechanically ventilated pigs were challenged with intravenous lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to achieve a status of profound hypodynamic shock. Systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics and cardiac output were continuously monitored throughout the 5-h study period, and blood samples were taken at baseline (T - 30 min), 1 h from the beginning of LPS infusion (T + 60 min), and every 2 h (T + 180 min and T + 300 min). Animals were randomly assigned to continuous intravenous esmolol infusion titrated to decrease heart rate by 20% or isotonic saline. RESULTS:Esmolol decreased heart rate by 20%, while in the saline group, heart rate increased by 7% and 22% at T + 180 min and T + 300 min, respectively (p < 0.001). In esmolol-treated animals, cardiac index decreased by 9% at T + 180 min and by 2% at T + 300 min, and in controls by 14% at T + 180 min and by 27% at T + 300 min (p = 0.870). In esmolol-treated animals, median (interquartile range, IQR) stroke index was 31 (6) and 47 (11) ml/min/m(2) at T + 180 min and T + 300 min, respectively, and decreased steadily from 45 (20) to 18 (13) ml/min/m(2) in controls (p = 0.030). There were no significant differences between groups for any other hemodynamics variables, except for systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: In large animals with endotoxemic shock, continuous infusion of esmolol, a selective beta-1 adrenergic blocker, titrated to decrease heart rate by 20%, was well tolerated and may offset LPS-induced cardiac dysfunction by a preload positive effect.
Authors: M Jourdain; O Carrette; A Tournoys; F Fourrier; C Mizon; J Mangalaboyi; J Goudemand; J Mizon; C Chopin Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1997-12 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: P J Devereaux; Homer Yang; Salim Yusuf; Gordon Guyatt; Kate Leslie; Juan Carlos Villar; Denis Xavier; Susan Chrolavicius; Launi Greenspan; Janice Pogue; Prem Pais; Lisheng Liu; Shouchun Xu; German Málaga; Alvaro Avezum; Matthew Chan; Victor M Montori; Mike Jacka; Peter Choi Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-05-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Martin Balik; Jan Rulisek; Pavel Leden; Michal Zakharchenko; Michal Otahal; Hana Bartakova; Josef Korinek Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; J Randall Curtis; Daniel De Backer; Goran Hedenstierna; Michael Joannidis; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jean-Charles Preiser; Patricia Rocco; Jean-François Timsit; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 17.440