PURPOSE: In adult animals, ventilation with variable tidal volume and rate improves lung mechanics, arterial oxygenation and ventilation compared to a monotonously controlled ventilation pattern. We assessed the physiological consequences of variable ventilation in the immature lung. METHODS: Lambs delivered at 129 days (term = 150 days) were euthanised (n = 9) or anaesthetised, tracheostomised and suctioned prior to prophylactic intra-tracheal surfactant instillation (Curosurf(®), 100 mg/kg) and commencement of controlled ventilation (50 breaths/min, tidal volume 7.7 ± 0.8 mL/kg). Volume history was standardised at 20 min with two sustained (3 s) inflations to 30 cmH(2)O followed immediately by measurement of baseline dynamic lung mechanics (FlexiVent, Scireq, Canada). Ventilation was continued according to prior randomisation (variable or conventional ventilation). For variable ventilation (n = 9), breath-to-breath tidal volume and respiratory rate varied but intra-breath minute volume (MV) and average tidal volume were equivalent to the conventional ventilation group with fixed tidal volume and rate (n = 7). Lung mechanics and gas exchange were measured at intervals. Lambs were euthanised at 2 h. Inflammatory cell counts and protein from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and lung tissue cytokine mRNA were quantified. RESULTS: At study completion, PaCO(2) (p = 0.026) and mean airway pressure (p = 0.002) were lower and pH (p = 0.047), ventilation efficiency index (p = 0.021) and dynamic compliance were higher (p = 0.003) in lambs on variable rather than conventional ventilation. However, oxygenation indices and post-mortem static compliances were not different between groups. CONCLUSION: Variable ventilation improves ventilation efficiency and in vivo lung compliance in the preterm lung, but unlike adult models, had no effect on arterial oxygenation.
PURPOSE: In adult animals, ventilation with variable tidal volume and rate improves lung mechanics, arterial oxygenation and ventilation compared to a monotonously controlled ventilation pattern. We assessed the physiological consequences of variable ventilation in the immature lung. METHODS:Lambs delivered at 129 days (term = 150 days) were euthanised (n = 9) or anaesthetised, tracheostomised and suctioned prior to prophylactic intra-tracheal surfactant instillation (Curosurf(®), 100 mg/kg) and commencement of controlled ventilation (50 breaths/min, tidal volume 7.7 ± 0.8 mL/kg). Volume history was standardised at 20 min with two sustained (3 s) inflations to 30 cmH(2)O followed immediately by measurement of baseline dynamic lung mechanics (FlexiVent, Scireq, Canada). Ventilation was continued according to prior randomisation (variable or conventional ventilation). For variable ventilation (n = 9), breath-to-breath tidal volume and respiratory rate varied but intra-breath minute volume (MV) and average tidal volume were equivalent to the conventional ventilation group with fixed tidal volume and rate (n = 7). Lung mechanics and gas exchange were measured at intervals. Lambs were euthanised at 2 h. Inflammatory cell counts and protein from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and lung tissue cytokine mRNA were quantified. RESULTS: At study completion, PaCO(2) (p = 0.026) and mean airway pressure (p = 0.002) were lower and pH (p = 0.047), ventilation efficiency index (p = 0.021) and dynamic compliance were higher (p = 0.003) in lambs on variable rather than conventional ventilation. However, oxygenation indices and post-mortem static compliances were not different between groups. CONCLUSION: Variable ventilation improves ventilation efficiency and in vivo lung compliance in the preterm lung, but unlike adult models, had no effect on arterial oxygenation.
Authors: Stephen P Arold; Rene Mora; Kenneth R Lutchen; Edward P Ingenito; Béla Suki Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Peter M Spieth; Alysson R Carvalho; Andreas Güldner; Paolo Pelosi; Oleg Kirichuk; Thea Koch; Marcelo Gama de Abreu Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Peter M Spieth; Alysson R Carvalho; Paolo Pelosi; Catharina Hoehn; Christoph Meissner; Michael Kasper; Matthias Hübler; Matthias von Neindorff; Constanze Dassow; Martina Barrenschee; Stefan Uhlig; Thea Koch; Marcelo Gama de Abreu Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-01-16 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Alysson R Carvalho; Peter M Spieth; Andreas Güldner; Maximilano Cuevas; Nadja C Carvalho; Alessandro Beda; Stephanie Spieth; Christian Stroczynski; Bärbel Wiedemann; Thea Koch; Paolo Pelosi; Marcelo Gama de Abreu Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2011-01-26
Authors: W A Mutch; S Harms; M Ruth Graham; S E Kowalski; L G Girling; G R Lefevre Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Carissa L Bellardine; Andrew M Hoffman; Larry Tsai; Edward P Ingenito; Stephen P Arold; Kenneth R Lutchen; Béla Suki Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Abdulaziz Boker; M Ruth Graham; Keith R Walley; Bruce M McManus; Linda G Girling; Elizabeth Walker; Gerald R Lefevre; W Alan C Mutch Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2002-02-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; J Randall Curtis; Daniel De Backer; Goran Hedenstierna; Michael Joannidis; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jean-Charles Preiser; Patricia Rocco; Jean-François Timsit; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Andre Dos Santos Rocha; Roberta Südy; Davide Bizzotto; Miklos Kassai; Tania Carvalho; Raffaele L Dellacà; Ferenc Peták; Walid Habre Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-01-13 Impact factor: 4.566