| Literature DB >> 21566769 |
Ali M Sabzghabaee1, Parisa Mirmoghtadaee, Mehdi Mohammadi.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Fruits and vegetables are important components of a healthy diet, and their consumption could help prevent a wide range of diseases. In this study, fruit and vegetable consumption in elderly people were assessed.Entities:
Keywords: Elderly; Fruit consumption; Vegetable
Year: 2010 PMID: 21566769 PMCID: PMC3075478
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Prev Med ISSN: 2008-7802
Characteristics of the study population
| Variables | % of participants |
|---|---|
| Male | 56.3 |
| Female | 43.7 |
| 65-74 | 69.4 |
| 75 and older | 30.6 |
| Yes | 11.9 |
| No | 88.1 |
| Lower than the poverty red line | 86.1 |
| Higher than the poverty red line | 13.9 |
| Less than 12 | 92.7 |
| More than 12 | 7.3 |
| Yes | 93.1 |
| No | 6.9 |
| 4 or less | 62.1 |
| 5 or more | 37.9 |
| 1 or less | 55.8 |
| 2 and more | 44.2 |
| 2 or less | 62.1 |
| 3 and more | 38.9 |
According to the unofficial report of provincial authorities, poverty red line was considered as monthly income of less than 435 US $ for an average family with4 members living in Isfahan city.
Fruit and vegetable consumption (isolated and combined) in different groups
| Fruit consumption (Serving/day) (Mean ± SD | P value | Vegetable consumption (Serving/day) (Mean ± SD) | P value | Fruit and vegetable consumption (Serving/day) (Mean ± SD) | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 65 -74 | 1.87±0.85 | 0.45 | 2.76±0.86 | 0.56 | 4.64±1.30 | 0.44 |
| 75 and more | 1.82±0.74 | 271±0.74 | 4.54±1.28 | ||||
| Sex | Men | 1.84±0.66 | 0.48 | 2.73±0.83 | 0.7 | 4.58±1.31 | 0.54 |
| Women | 1.88 ± 0.7 | 2.76±0.83 | 4.65 ± 1.28 | ||||
| Smoking | Yes | 1.89±0.59 | 0.72 | 2.71±0.59 | 0.76 | 4.60±0.92 | 0.98 |
| No | 1.85±.69 | 2.75±0.85 | 4.61±1.31 | ||||
| Educational evel | Lower than high school | 1.82 ± 0.82 | 0.02 | 2.70 ± 0.79 | 0.001 | 4.52 ± 1.27 | 0.000 |
| Higher than high school | 2.14 ± 0.54 | 3.06 ± 0.63 | 5.23 ± 1.33 | ||||
| Monthly income | Lower than poverty red line | 1.83 ± 0.66 | 0.01 | 2.72 ± 0.82 | 0.12 | 4.55 ± 1.29 | 0.01 |
| Higher than poverty red line | 2.04 ± 0.75 | 2.89 ± 0.86 | 4.94 ± 1.26 |
P value <0.05 was considered significant