Literature DB >> 21566532

Surgical approach to the cervicothoracic junction: can a standard Smith-Robinson approach be utilized?

Woojin Cho1, Jacob M Buchowski, Yung Park, Takeshi Maeda, Colin E Nabb, K Daniel Riew.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case series study.
OBJECTIVES: To determine when the standard Smith-Robinson approach can be used successfully to approach the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Most of techniques for exposing the anterior CTJ are associated with significant morbidity. To our knowledge, there is no reliable technique, which described to determine when the standard Smith-Robinson approach is adequate and when a more invasive approach, such as a sternal splitting approach, is necessary to approach the CTJ anteriorly.
METHODS: We evaluated the ability of the following technique to preoperatively determine whether a standard Smith-Robinson approach can be used to approach the CTJ: on the lateral plain radiograph, a line was drawn from the intended skin incision site to the top of the manubrium (at the suprasternal notch) to the level of the disc space. If it appeared that this trajectory would allow adequate exposure of the CTJ, then the operation was performed through the standard Smith-Robinson approach. The records and radiographs of all patients who had undergone anterior cervicothoracic arthrodesis to T1 or below were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 99 patients who underwent an anterior cervicothoracic fusion using the standard Smith-Robinson approach were identifed. Using the proposed technique, there were no cases in which the planned lowest instrumented vertebra could not be safely reached through the standard Smith-Robinson approach. No procedure was abandoned or converted to a sternotomy approach.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that if the lowest instrumented vertebra can be seen on a lateral radiograph and a line passing from the intended skin incision site to this level lies on top of the manubrium, a routine Smith-Robinson approach can be used to expose the level. To our knowledge, this is the largest series outlining a simple guideline for approaching the anterior CTJ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21566532     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31821c2d60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  6 in total

1.  Can standard anterior Smith-Robinson supramanubrial approach be utilized for approach down to T2 or T3?

Authors:  Weerasak Singhatanadgige; Lukas P Zebala; Panya Luksanapruksa; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of Patient-Reported Postoperative Dysphagia in Patients Undergoing One-Level Versus Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with the Zero-P Implant System.

Authors:  Chengyi Huang; Haimiti Abudouaini; Beiyu Wang; Chen Ding; Yang Meng; Yi Yang; Tingkui Wu; Hao Liu
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Sternotomy Approach to the Anterior Cervicothoracic Spine.

Authors:  Brian Fiani; Daniel Chacon; Claudia Covarrubias; Erika Sarno; Athanasios Kondilis
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-09

4.  Determining Accessibility of Anterior Cervicothoracic Spine Based on Age and Gender: Radiographic Analysis of Computed Tomography Scans.

Authors:  Rafael Lindi Sugino; Alexandre Sadao Iutaka; Samuel K Cho; Daniel R Cataldo; Luis Marchi; Carlos Fernando Pereira da Silva Herrero
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2022-01-21

5.  The Transmanubrial Approach for Cervicothoracic Junction Lesions : Feasibility, Limitations, and Advantages.

Authors:  Jong-Hyun Park; Soo Bin Im; Je Hoon Jeong; Sun Chul Hwang; Dong-Seung Shin; Bum-Tae Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-09-30

6.  The effect of the difference in C2-7 angle on the occurrence of dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with the zero-P implant system.

Authors:  Cheng-Yi Huang; Yang Meng; Bei-Yu Wang; Jie Yu; Chen Ding; Yi Yang; Ting-Kui Wu; Hao Liu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.