BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Vascular calcification is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. Human and animal studies indicate that sodium thiosulfate (STS) may prevent the progression of vascular calcifications. The pharmacokinetics of STS in hemodialysis patients has not been investigated yet. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: STS was given intravenously to 10 hemodialysis patients on- and off-hemodialysis. Additionally, STS was applied to 9 healthy volunteers once intravenously and once orally. Thiosulfate concentrations were measured by using a specific and sensitive HPLC method. RESULTS: In volunteers and patients, mean endogenous thiosulfate baseline concentrations were 5.5 ± 1.82 versus 7.1 ± 2.7 μmol/L. Renal clearance was high in volunteers (1.86 ± 0.45 ml/min per kg) and reflected GFR. Nonrenal clearance was slightly, but not significantly, higher in volunteers (2.25 ± 0.32 ml/min per kg) than in anuric patients (2.04 ± 0.72 ml/min per kg). Hemodialysis clearance of STS was 2.62 ± 1.01 ml/min per kg. On the basis of the nonrenal clearance and the thiosulfate steady-state serum concentrations, a mean endogenous thiosulfate generation rate of 14.6 nmol/min per kg was calculated in patients. After oral application, only 4% of STS was recovered in urine of volunteers, reflecting a low bioavailability of 7.6% (0.8% to 26%). CONCLUSIONS: Given the low and variable bioavailability of oral STS, only intravenous STS should be prescribed today. The biologic relevance of the high hemodialysis clearance for the optimal time point of STS dosing awaits clarification of the mechanisms of action of STS.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Vascular calcification is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. Human and animal studies indicate that sodium thiosulfate (STS) may prevent the progression of vascular calcifications. The pharmacokinetics of STS in hemodialysis patients has not been investigated yet. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: STS was given intravenously to 10 hemodialysis patients on- and off-hemodialysis. Additionally, STS was applied to 9 healthy volunteers once intravenously and once orally. Thiosulfate concentrations were measured by using a specific and sensitive HPLC method. RESULTS: In volunteers and patients, mean endogenous thiosulfate baseline concentrations were 5.5 ± 1.82 versus 7.1 ± 2.7 μmol/L. Renal clearance was high in volunteers (1.86 ± 0.45 ml/min per kg) and reflected GFR. Nonrenal clearance was slightly, but not significantly, higher in volunteers (2.25 ± 0.32 ml/min per kg) than in anuric patients (2.04 ± 0.72 ml/min per kg). Hemodialysis clearance of STS was 2.62 ± 1.01 ml/min per kg. On the basis of the nonrenal clearance and the thiosulfate steady-state serum concentrations, a mean endogenous thiosulfate generation rate of 14.6 nmol/min per kg was calculated in patients. After oral application, only 4% of STS was recovered in urine of volunteers, reflecting a low bioavailability of 7.6% (0.8% to 26%). CONCLUSIONS: Given the low and variable bioavailability of oral STS, only intravenous STS should be prescribed today. The biologic relevance of the high hemodialysis clearance for the optimal time point of STS dosing awaits clarification of the mechanisms of action of STS.
Authors: Pauline M Snijder; Madina Baratashvili; Nicola A Grzeschik; Henri G D Leuvenink; Lucas Kuijpers; Sippie Huitema; Onno Schaap; Ben N G Giepmans; Jeroen Kuipers; Jan Lj Miljkovic; Aleksandra Mitrovic; Eelke M Bos; Csaba Szabó; Harm H Kampinga; Pascale F Dijkers; Eelke M Bos; Csaba Szabó; Harm H Kampinga; Pascale F Dijkers; Wilfred F A den Dunnen; Milos R Filipovic; Harry van Goor; Ody C M Sibon Journal: Mol Med Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 6.354
Authors: P M Snijder; A R Frenay; R A de Boer; A Pasch; J L Hillebrands; H G D Leuvenink; H van Goor Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Else van den Berg; Andreas Pasch; Welmoet H Westendorp; Gerjan Navis; Elizabeth J Brink; Reinold O B Gans; Harry van Goor; Stephan J L Bakker Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-02-07 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Rakesh K Bijarnia; Matthias Bachtler; Prakash G Chandak; Harry van Goor; Andreas Pasch Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 3.240