Literature DB >> 21565455

Airborne transmission of a highly pathogenic avian influenza virus strain H5N1 between groups of chickens quantified in an experimental setting.

D Spekreijse1, A Bouma, G Koch, J A Stegeman.   

Abstract

Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) is a devastating viral disease of poultry and quick control of outbreaks is vital. Airborne transmission has often been suggested as a route of transmission between flocks, but knowledge of the rate of transmission via this route is sparse. In the current study, we quantified the rate of airborne transmission of an HPAI H5N1 virus strain between chickens under experimental conditions. In addition, we quantified viral load in air and dust samples. Sixteen trials were done, comprising a total of 160 chickens housed in cages, with three treatment groups. The first group was inoculated with strain A/turkey/Turkey/1/2005 H5N1, the second and third group were not inoculated, but housed at 0.2 and 1.1m distance of the first group, respectively. Tracheal and cloacal swabs were collected daily of each chicken to monitor virus transmission. Air and dust samples were taken daily to quantify virus load in the immediate surroundings of the birds. Samples were tested by quantitative RRT-PCR and virus isolation. In 4 out of 16 trials virus was transmitted from the experimentally inoculated chickens to the non-inoculated chickens. The transmission rate was 0.13 and 0.10 new infections per infectious bird at 0.2m and 1.1m, respectively. The difference between these estimates was, however, not significant. Two air samples tested positive in virus isolation, but none of these samples originated from the trials with successful transmission. Five dust samples were confirmed positive in virus isolation. The results of this study demonstrate that the rate of airborne transmission between chickens over short distances is low, suggesting that airborne transmission over a long distance is an unlikely route of spread. Whether or not this also applies to the field situation needs to be examined.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21565455     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.04.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  14 in total

1.  Implications of within-farm transmission for network dynamics: consequences for the spread of avian influenza.

Authors:  Sema Nickbakhsh; Louise Matthews; Jennifer E Dent; Giles T Innocent; Mark E Arnold; Stuart W J Reid; Rowland R Kao
Journal:  Epidemics       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 4.396

2.  Epidemiological analysis of spatially misaligned data: a case of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus outbreak in Nigeria.

Authors:  O A Adegboye; D Kotze
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 4.434

3.  Influenza A(H7N9) virus transmission between finches and poultry.

Authors:  Jeremy C Jones; Stephanie Sonnberg; Richard J Webby; Robert G Webster
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.883

4.  Quantification of dust-borne transmission of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus between chickens.

Authors:  Dieuwertje Spekreijse; Annemarie Bouma; Guus Koch; Arjan Stegeman
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 5.  The evolution of transmission mode.

Authors:  Janis Antonovics; Anthony J Wilson; Mark R Forbes; Heidi C Hauffe; Eva R Kallio; Helen C Leggett; Ben Longdon; Beth Okamura; Steven M Sait; Joanne P Webster
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Estimating the introduction time of highly pathogenic avian influenza into poultry flocks.

Authors:  Peter H F Hobbelen; Armin R W Elbers; Marleen Werkman; Guus Koch; Francisca C Velkers; Arjan Stegeman; Thomas J Hagenaars
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Using quantitative disease dynamics as a tool for guiding response to avian influenza in poultry in the United States of America.

Authors:  K M Pepin; E Spackman; J D Brown; K L Pabilonia; L P Garber; J T Weaver; D A Kennedy; K A Patyk; K P Huyvaert; R S Miller; A B Franklin; K Pedersen; T L Bogich; P Rohani; S A Shriner; C T Webb; S Riley
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.670

8.  Minimizing the threat of pandemic emergence from avian influenza in poultry systems.

Authors:  Kim M Pepin; James O Lloyd-Smith; Colleen T Webb; Karen Holcomb; Huachen Zhu; Yi Guan; Steven Riley
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 9.  Who acquires infection from whom and how? Disentangling multi-host and multi-mode transmission dynamics in the 'elimination' era.

Authors:  Joanne P Webster; Anna Borlase; James W Rudge
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Airborne Detection of H5N8 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus Genome in Poultry Farms, France.

Authors:  Axelle Scoizec; Eric Niqueux; Rodolphe Thomas; Patrick Daniel; Audrey Schmitz; Sophie Le Bouquin
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-02-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.