| Literature DB >> 21565379 |
Lee D Bryant1, Paul A Gantzer, John C Little.
Abstract
Hypolimnetic oxygenation systems (HOx) are increasingly used in lakes and reservoirs to elevate dissolved oxygen (O(2)) while preserving stratification, thereby decreasing concentrations of reduced chemical species in the hypolimnion. By maintaining an oxic zone in the upper sediment, HOx suppress fluxes of reduced soluble species from the sediment into the overlying water. However, diminished HOx performance has been observed due to HOx-induced increases in sediment O(2) uptake. Based on a series of in situ O(2) microprofile and current velocity measurements, this study evaluates the vertical O(2) distribution at the sediment-water interface as a function of HOx operation. These data were used to determine how sediment O(2) uptake rate (JO2) and sediment oxic-zone depth (z(max)) were affected by applied oxygen-gas flow rate, changes in near-sediment mixing and O(2) concentration, and proximity to the HOx. The vertical sediment-water O(2) distribution was found to be strongly influenced by oxygenation on a reservoir-wide basis. Elevated JO2 and an oxic sediment zone were maintained during continuous HOx operation, with z(max) increasing linearly with HOx flow rate. In contrast, JO2 decreased to zero and the sediment became anoxic as the vertical O(2) distribution at the sediment-water interface collapsed during periods when the HOx was turned off and near-sediment mixing and O(2) concentrations decreased. JO2 and z(max) throughout the reservoir were found to be largely governed by HOx-induced mixing rather than O(2) levels in the water column. By quantifying how JO2 and z(max) vary in response to HOx operations, this work (1) characterizes how hypolimnetic oxygenation affects sediment O(2) dynamics, (2) contributes to the optimization of water quality and management of HOx-equipped lakes and reservoirs, and (3) enhances understanding of the effect of mixing and O(2) concentrations in other systems.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21565379 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.04.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Water Res ISSN: 0043-1354 Impact factor: 11.236